Published for surgical technology educators by the Association of Surgical Technologists
I N S T R U C
T
O R S
VOLUME 19, NUMBER 2APRIL/M AY 2016
Evaluation Techniques in the Lab
Aid Student Readiness for the OR
continued on page 10
Angie Wachter, CST, and Robert Lion, PhD
New graduate success in the operating room depends on many
elements including maturity, work history and previous educa-
tion. Along with individual factors that recent graduates bring to
the operating room (OR), the preceptors and clinical sites play
an important role. Our goal as educators was to take the didac-
tic coursework and establish systems and approaches to make
its consumption more palatable, ultimately resulting in students
graduating from a program as equipped as possible to be suc-
cessful in the OR.
with the student). Previously, a student
would typically only be evaluated by
the instructor…a very one dimensional
weekly assessment approach. By moving
to the multi-rater approach, the faculty
utilize a number of different evaluation
approaches as sources of feedback to
better and more accurately address indi-
vidual successes and shortcomings. The
strength of this approach is that it allows
not just faculty evaluation, but also peer
and self-evaluations on a weekly basis.
With the goal being competence, these
other sources help provide a more ac-
curate assessment of how the student is
meeting the goal. In addition the faculty
strengthened the focus on learning and
development by added video recordings
and purposeful student pairings (spe-
cifically pairing stronger students with
weaker students) to help develop addi-
tional skills in mentoring and leadership.
Mock surgical experiences and simu-
lated environments have improved the
preparation of students for the OR.
ISTORICALLY, EDUCATORS HAVE
wrestled with how to best deliver
and evaluate educational content
to ensure students have the ability to
apply, not just recall, the lessons learned.
The College of Western Idaho is work-
ing to do just this in its surgical technol-
ogy program.
In response to industry concerns relat-
ing to student readiness for the increas-
ingly competitive surgical technologist
positions, and in light of the high-paced
and high-pressure work environments,
the faculty recognized the need to
revisit how surgical technologists are
trained. Borrowing a corporate model,
the faculty moved their program from
being a teach-test-repeat approach to a
more dynamic and rich learning experi-
ence based on multi-rater feedback.
Simply put, multi-rater feedback looks
at evaluation processes that are more
360 degrees in nature (soliciting feed-
back/evaluation/input from a variety of
people that have a working relationship
H
inside
p3
San Diego in Review
See who was at the 2016
Instructors Workshop in May
and find out who received
AST Educator of the Year
scholarships.
p8
National Surgical
Technologists Week
Get some ideas of how to
celebrate National Surgical
Technologists Week and read
about the educator who cre-
ated this year’s theme.
p9
Mini
Poster
Print this
mini poster
to use
during your
National
Surgical
Technologists Week celebra-
tions.
p12
National Honor Society
Inductees
See which schools’ students
were recognized in the Nation-
al Honor Society this spring.
p4–7
Galaxy of Stars
Congratulations to the 438
schools recognized this year in
AST’s Galaxy of Stars!
p2
Get Hooked with AST’s Face-
book Photo Contest
Say Cheese! Promote the pro-
fession and your institution
during National Surgical Tech-
nologists Week. Just work
with your student cohorts to
plan interesting celebrations,
take photos and enter AST’s
Facebook Photo Contest for a
chance to win prizes.
Nationa Surgica Technologist Wee
September 18-24, 2016
Sponsored by the Association
of Surgical Technologists
Hundreds of products are available at
WWW.SURGTECHWEEK.COM to help you
celebrate. Call 1-800-822-1923 and let us help you
find the right one at the best price.
SHOW YOUR
PRIDE DURING
TECH WEEK
www.surgtechweek.com
2
National Surg Tech Week Photo Contest
Photos should be engaging enough
to garner votes from working surgi-
cal technologists as well as from other
students. Only one photo may be
entered per cohort. First, second and
third prizes will be awarded to every
member of the three winning cohorts.
First prize: Computer Messenger Bags
Second prize: Hot and Cold Geometric
Tumblers
Third prize: Junior Padfolios
Winning schools will also be recog-
nized on AST’s website and in the
journal. To ensure fairness for smaller
schools, AST’s prizes will be drawn
from a pool of all eligible entries. But
we encourage educators to support
friendly competition among your
school’s cohorts or between other
schools in your state, by recognizing
the cohort with the most votes.
Any school can enter but your school
must be accredited by CAAHEP to be
eligible to win AST prizes.
Read the rules outlined below.
In September, visit AST’s Facebook
page, www.facebook.com/
AssociationofSurgical
Technologists/, click on the Contest
tab and follow the directions to get
started.
Complete the entry form, write a
short description and upload your
photos (limit one per cohort, please)
between Sept. 15-27, 2016. Please
include the number of students in
the cohort in the description.
Encourage your students and col-
leagues to vote. Voting begins Sept.
21 and runs through Oct. 5, 2016.
Individuals can vote for one entry,
once per day during the voting
period.
Photos must contain at least one
person and must depict some way
of celebrating National Surgical
Technologists Week or recognizing
your profession. You must include a
description of your celebration with
the entry.
Photos cannot show name badges,
boards or screens containing patient
names, or any other view that would
violate HIPPA regulations. It is also
your responsibility to know your
employer’s policy about photogra-
phy and the use of cell phones in
your facility. AST is not liable for any
disciplinary action taken
against you for failing to
know and follow policy.
Get permission from the
students in your photo
before entering it into this
contest. The image will
appear online and, pos-
sibly, in print. By entering,
you are verifying that
everyone in the photo
gave you (and subse-
quently AST) approval to
use their likeness.
Photos must be submitted Sept.15-
27, 2016, through AST’s Facebook
page. See How to Enter above.
Although voting continues online
until Oct. 5, new submissions will not
be accepted after Sept. 27. Mailed
entries will not be accepted. If you
are having trouble uploading photos
from your phone or computer, con-
tact AST through Facebook.
Educators must enter on behalf of
their student cohorts. Only one entry
per photo (no duplicate photos) and
only one photo entry per school
cohort is allowed. Educators can
enter for multiple cohorts from their
institution.
Photos may be disqualified and
removed from Facebook at AST’s
discretion at any time, without
notification. Causes for disqualifica-
tion include a HIPPA violation, lack
of permission from subjects in the
photo, profanity/obscenities, blatant
sales or product pitches, etc.
To be eligible for student prizes,
your school must be accredited by
CAAHEP.
AST’s board will draw the winner of
the school prizes from the eligible
entries. You must submit a valid
email address to win. Winners will be
notified and announced on Facebook
and AST’s website sometime before
Oct. 31, 2016.
T-shirts, sweatshirts, badge holders
and other products with the theme
Get Hooked” are available at www.
surgtechweek.com and, for a setup
fee, can be customized with your
school name.
Get hooked and enjoy the week!
How to
Enter
Prizes
Rules
Enter for a Chance to
Win Prizes for Your Cohort
Involve your s t u d ents in planning for Nat ional Surgica l Tec hnologists
Week a n d bo os t t he ir pr ide in t heir pr ofe ssion. Then, as e ach c oh ort
figures out h ow to ce leb r ate , ca pt ur e their fun “on film” (digit a lly) and
enter the photos in AS T ’s Facebook Phot o Contes t.
Just ask e ac h co hort to pose for a n e ng a ging pict ur e showing how
they ’re celebrating Nationa l Surgical Tec hnologists Week (S e pt. 18 -24,
2016) a nd “ge tt ing hooked” on the pr ofe ssion. Ent e r t he p hotos in AST’s
Facebo ok Ph oto Conte s t for a c h a nc e to win pr izes. Th en e nc oura ge your
stu de nts t o vote for t heir co hort ’s entry.
3
Tuesday evening before ASTs
National Conference in San Diego,
surgical technology educators from
around the country gathered for
Instructors Workshop. After a greet-
ing by AST President Roy Zacharias,
CST, FAST, keynote speaker Diane
Jordan put everyone at ease by
talking about the healing power of
laughter.
Wednesday, educators learned
more about instructional strategies
for developing professional students,
dealing with difficult situations,
recruiting preceptors and other rel-
evant topics. A big thank you to all
of our speakers: Dodi Brown,
CST,
program director, Mt. Diablo Adult
Education; Joseph Charleman,
CST,
CSFA, chair for surgical technology
and surgical processing programs,
Berkeley College; Cindy Mask,
CST, FAST, program director, Tar-
rant County College; Debra Mays,
CST, clinical coordinator, Glendale
Career College; Christopher Mc-
Griff,
CST, Mayo Clinic-Rochester;
TC Parker,
CST, BS, program director,
Gwinnett Technical College; and
Wanda Walter,
CST, department
chair, Brown Mackie College.
President Zacharias announced two
AST Educator of the Year scholar-
ship recipients during Instructors
Workshop:
Clinical Educator of the Year –
Erin Baggett, CST, MS, instructor,
Gwinnett Technical College
Didactic Educator of the Year –
Cindy Mast,
CST, AA, program
director, Tarrant County College
Watch for more information about
these two dynamic women in the
next issue of Instructors News.
SAN DIEGO IN REVIEW
4
ALABAMA
Bevill State Community College, Sumiton
Calhoun Community College, Decatur
Faulkner State Community College, Bay Minette
Flowers Hospital, Dothan
Huntsville Hospital
Lurleen B. Wallace Community College, Opp
Southern Union State Community College, Opelika
Virginia College – Birmingham
Virginia College – Mobile
ARKANSAS
Arkansas State University – Newport
Baptist School of Surgical Technology, Little Rock
North Arkansas College, Harrison
Northwest Technical Institute, Springdale
South Arkansas Community College, El Dorado
Southeast Arkansas College, Pine Bluff
University of Arkansas – Fort Smith
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences,
North Little Rock
ARIZONA
East Valley Institute of Technology, Mesa
GateWay Community College, Phoenix
Mohave Community College, Lake Havasu City
Pima Community College, Tucson
CALIFORNIA
Career Networks Institute, Orange
Carrington College California – Citrus Heights
Carrington College California – San Jose
Concorde Career College – North Hollywood
Concorde Career College – San Bernardino
Concorde Career College – San Diego
Glendale Career College – Glendale
Miracosta Community College, Oceanside
Mount Diablo Adult Education Center, Concord
North-West College – Riverside
North-West College – West Covina
Premiere Career College, Irwindale
San Joaquin Valley College – Bakersfield
San Joaquin Valley College – Fresno
Simi Valley Career Institute
Skyline College, San Bruno
Southwestern Community College, Chula Vista
COLORADO
Aims Community College, Greeley
Concorde Career College – Aurora
Everest College – Thornton
CONNECTICUT
Albert I. Prince CTHSS, Hartford
Bridgeport Hospital School of Nursing
Eli Whitney Vocational Technical School, Hamden
Manchester Community Technical College
DELAWARE
Delaware Technical Community College, Dover
FLORIDA
Cape Coral Institute of Technology
College of Central Florida – Ocala
Concorde Career College – Miramar
Concorde Career Institute – Jacksonville
Concorde Career Institute – Orlando
Concorde Career Institute – Tampa
Daytona State College, Daytona Beach
Eastern Florida State College, Cocoa
Florida State College at Jacksonville
Fortis College – Orange Park
Fortis Institute Lauderdale Lakes
Gulf Coast State College, Panama City
Indian River State College, Port Saint Lucie
Keiser University – Clearwater
Lindsey Hopkins Education Center, Miami
Lorenzo Walker Institute of Technology, Naples
Manatee Technical Institute, Bradenton
Orlando Technical Educational Center
Palm Beach State College, Lake Worth
Pensacola State College
Pinellas Technical Education Center,
Saint Petersburg
Riveroak Technical College, Live Oak
Santa Fe Community College, Gainesville
Sheridan Technical College, Hollywood
Southeastern College – Palm Beach
Southeastern College – Miami Lakes, Hialeah
Southeastern College – Tampa
Suncoast Technical College, Sarasota
Tallahassee Community College
Traviss Career Center, Lakeland
Virginia College – Pensacola
GEORGIA
Albany Technical College
Athens Technical College
Atlanta Technical College
Augusta Technical College
Central Georgia Technical College, Macon
Chattahoochee Technical College, Marietta
Coastal Pines Technical College, Waycross
Columbus Technical College
Everest Institute – Marietta
Georgia Northwestern Technical College Walker
County Campus, Rock Spring
Gwinnett Technical College, Lawrenceville
Lanier Technical College, Oakwood
2016
Galaxy StarsGalaxy Stars
Congr atul a t i o ns t o all o f o ur G al a xy Stars and t o t h e g r an d prize w i nn e rs:
Dorothy Connolly, Bridgeport Hospital School of Nursing, and Yvette Johnson,
Columb us St a te Commu ni ty Colle g e. M o re inf o rm a t io n a b o u t t h e G al a xy Pro-
gram is available at www.ast.or g/Educators/Galaxy_ Pro gr am.
5
Ogeechee Technical College, Statesboro
Savannah Technical College
Southern Crescent Technical College- Griffin
Southern Regional Technical College, Tifton
Virginia College – Augusta
Virginia College – Columbus
Virginia College – Savannah
West Georgia Technical College, Waco
Wiregrass Georgia Technical College, Valdosta
HAWAII
Kapiolani Community College, Honolulu
IOWA
Des Moines Area Community College, Ankeny
Iowa Lakes Community College, Spencer
Iowa Western Community College, Council Bluffs
Kirkwood Community College, Cedar Rapids
Mercy College of Health Sciences, Des Moines
Scott Community College, Bettendorf
Western Iowa Tech Community College, Sioux City
IDAHO
College of Southern Idaho, Twin Falls
College of Western Idaho at Boise State University
Eastern Idaho Technical College, Idaho Falls
ILLINOIS
College of DuPage, Glen Ellyn
College of Lake County, Grayslake
Elgin Community College
Illinois Central College, Peoria
John Wood Community College, Quincy
Lincoln Land Community College, Springfield
Malcolm X College, Chicago
Parkland College, Champaign
Prairie State College, Chicago Heights
Richland Community College, Decatur
Robert Morris College, Chicago
Rock Valley College, Rockford
Southern Illinois Collegiate Common Market, Herrin
Triton College, River Grove
Waubonsee Community College, Sugar Grove
INDIANA
Harrison College – Ft. Wayne Campus
Harrison College – Indianapolis East Campus
Indiana University Health, Indianapolis
Ivy Tech Community College - Columbus
Ivy Tech Community College - Evansville
Ivy Tech Community College - Indianapolis
Ivy Tech Community College – Kokomo
Ivy Tech Community College – Lafayette
Ivy Tech Community College – Muncie
Ivy Tech Community College – Terre Haute
Ivy Tech Community College – Valparaiso
National College – Indianapolis
University of Saint Francis, Fort Wayne
Vincennes University
KANSAS
Hutchinson Community College
Neosho County Community College, Ottawa
Seward County Community College, Liberal
Washburn Institute of Technology, Topeka
Wichita Area Technical College
KENTUCKY
Ashland Community & Technical College
Bluegrass Community & Technical College,
Lexington
Hazard Community & Technical College
Jefferson Community & Technical College, Louisville
Madisonville Community College
National College – Florence
National College – Lexington
National College – Louisville
Owensboro Community & Technical College
Saint Catharine College
Somerset Community College
Southcentral Kentucky Community & Technical
College, Bowling Green
Southeast Kentucky Community
& Technical College, Pineville
Spencerian College, Louisville
West Kentucky Community & Technical College,
Paducah
LOUISIANA
Baton Rouge Community College
Bossier Parish Community College
Career Technical College – Monroe
Delgado Community College, New Orleans
Fortis College - Baton Rouge
South Central Louisiana Technical College-
LaFourche, Thibodaux
South Louisiana Community College – Lafayette
Southern University at Shreveport
Virginia College – Baton Rouge
MASSACHUSETTS
Bunker Hill Community College, Chelsea
Massachusetts Bay Community College,
Framingham
McCann Technical School, North Adams
North Shore Community College, Danvers
Quincy College, Division of Natural
& Health Sciences
Quinsigamond Community College, Worcester
Springfield Technical Community College
MARYLAND
Anne Arundel Community College, Arnold
Baltimore City Community College
Chesapeake College, Wye Mills
Community College of Baltimore County
Fortis Institute – Woodlawn, Baltimore
Frederick Community College
Montgomery College, Rockville
MAINE
Eastern Maine Community College, Bangor
Maine Medical Center, South Portland
MICHIGAN
Baker College – Allen Park
Baker College – Cadillac
Baker College – Clinton Township
Baker College – Flint
Baker College – Jackson
Baker College – Muskegon
Delta College, University Center
Henry Ford College, Dearborn
Lansing Community College
Macomb Community College, Clinton Township
Northern Michigan University, Marquette
Oakland Community College – Southfield Campus
Wayne County Community College, Detroit
MINNESOTA
Anoka Technical College
Lake Superior College, Duluth
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester
Minnesota West Community & Technical College,
Luverne
Northland Community & Technical College,
East Grand Forks
Rasmussen College – Brooklyn Park, Minneapolis
Rasmussen College – Moorhead
Rasmussen College – Saint Cloud
Rochester Community & Technical College
Saint Cloud Technical College
MISSOURI
Columbia Public Schools –
Program of Surgical Technology
Hillyard Technical Center, Saint Joseph
Lincoln University of Missouri, Jefferson City
6
Metropolitan Community College – Penn Valley,
Kansas City
Ozarks Technical Community College, Springfield
Rolla Technical Center
Saint Louis Community College
South Central Career Center, West Plains
Southeast Missouri Hospital – College of Nursing
& Health Sciences, Cape Girardeau
MISSISSIPPI
East Central Community College, Decatur
Hinds Community College, Jackson
Holmes Community College, Grenada
Itawamba Community College, Tupelo
Meridian Community College
Mississippi Gulf Coast Community College, Gulfport
Pearl River Community College, Hattiesburg
Virginia College – Biloxi
Virginia College – Jackson
MONTANA
Flathead Valley Community College, Kalispell
Great Falls College Montana State University
University of Montana, Missoula
NORTH CAROLINA
Asheville-Buncombe Technical Community College
Blue Ridge Community College, Flat Rock
Cabarrus College of Health Sciences, Concord
Cape Fear Community College, Wilmington
Carolinas College of Health Sciences, Charlotte
Catawba Valley Community College, Hickory
Central Piedmont Community College, Charlotte
Coastal Carolina Community College, Jacksonville
College of the Albemarle, Elizabeth City
Durham Technical Community College
Edgecombe Community College, Tarboro
Fayetteville Technical Community College
Foothills Surgical Technical Consortium – Cleveland
Community College, Shelby
Guilford Technical Community College, Jamestown
Lenoir Community College, Kinston
Miller-Motte College – Cary
Miller-Motte College – Wilmington
Robeson Community College, Lumberton
Rockingham Community College, Wentworth
Sandhills Community College, Pinehurst
South College, Asheville
Wake Technical Community College, Raleigh
Wilson Technical Community College
NORTH DAKOTA
Bismarck State College
NEBRASKA
Nebraska Methodist College, Omaha
Southeast Community College, Lincoln
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Concord Hospital, Concord
Great Bay Community College, Portsmouth
NEW JERSEY
Atlantic Cape Community College, Atlantic City
Bergen Community College, Paramus
Berkeley College, Clifton
Eastwick College, Ramsey
Sussex County Community College, Newton
NEW MEXICO
Brown Mackie College – Albuquerque
Central New Mexico Community College,
Albuquerque
San Juan College, Farmington
NEVADA
College of Southern Nevada, Las Vegas
Nevada Career Institute, Las Vegas
NEW YORK
Bronx Lebanon Hospital Center, New York
Finger Lakes Health College of Nursing, Geneva
Kingsborough Community College, Brooklyn
Long Island University, Brooklyn
Nassau Community College, Garden City
Niagara County Community College, Sanborn
NYU Langone Hospitals Center, New York
Onondaga Community College, Syracuse
Swedish Institute, New York
Trocaire College, Buffalo
Ulster County BOCES, Port Ewen
Western Suffolk BOCES – Dix Hills, Northport
OHIO
Buckeye Hills Career Center, Rio Grande
Central Ohio Technical College, Newark
Choffin Career & Technical Center, Youngstown
Cincinnati State Technical & Community College
Collins Career Center, Chesapeake
Columbus State Community College
Cuyahoga Community College, Cleveland
EHOVE School of Surgical Technology, Milan
Fortis College – Columbus, Westerville
Lakeland Community College, Kirtland
Lorain County Community College, Elyria
Miami-Jacobs Career College, Dayton
National College – Cincinnati
National College – Kettering
National College – Stow
National College – Youngstown
Owens State Community College, Toledo
Scioto County Joint Vocational School, Lucasville
Sinclair Community College, Dayton
University of Akron
University of Cincinnati – Clermont College, Batavia
Washington County Career Center, Marietta
OKLAHOMA
Autry Technology Center, Enid
Brown Mackie College – Tulsa
Canadian Valley Technology Center, Chickasha
Central Technology Center, Drumright
Cherokee Nation WW Hastings Hospital, Tahlequah
Community Care College, Tulsa
Great Plains Technology Center, Lawton
Indian Capital Technology Center -
Muskogee Campus, Stilwell
Metro Technology Centers, Oklahoma City
Moore Norman Technology Center
Platt College – Oklahoma City
Tulsa Technology Center
Wes Watkins Technology Center, Wetumka
OREGON
Concorde Career Institute – Portland
Mount Hood Community College, Gresham
PENNSYLVANIA
Community College of Allegheny County –
Boyce Campus, Monroeville
Conemaugh Valley Memorial Hospital, Johnstown
Delaware County Community College, Media
Great Lakes Institute of Technology, Erie
Harrisburg Area Community College
Lackawanna College, Towanda
Luzerne County Community College, Nanticoke
McCann School of Business & Technology –
Allentown
McCann School of Business & Technology – Carlisle
McCann School of Business & Technology – Hazelton
McCann School of Business & Technology – Sunbury
Montgomery County Community College, Pottstown
Mount Aloysius College, Cresson
Pennsylvania College of Health Sciences, Lancaster
7
Pennsylvania College of Technology, Williamsport
Pittsburgh Technical Institute, Oakdale
Reading Hospital School of Health Sciences
Saint Luke’s Hospital, Bethlehem
RHODE ISLAND
New England Institute of Technology,
East Greenwich
SOUTH CAROLINA
Aiken Technical College
Central Carolina Technical College, Sumter
Florence-Darlington Technical College
Greenville Technical College
Horry-Georgetown Technical College
Midlands Technical College, West Columbia
Miller-Motte Technical College - Charleston
Piedmont Technical College, Greenwood
Spartanburg Community College
Technical College of the Lowcountry, Beaufort
Tri-County Technical College, Pendleton
Virginia College – Charleston
Virginia College – Columbia
Virginia College – Greenville
York Technical College, Rock Hill
SOUTH DAKOTA
Presentation College, Aberdeen
Southeast Technical Institute, Sioux Falls
Western Dakota Technical Institute, Rapid City
TENNESSEE
Chattanooga State Technical Community College
Concorde Career College - Memphis
Fortis College – Cookeville
Fortis Institute – Nashville
Meridian Institute of Surgical Assisting, Joelton
Miller-Motte Technical College – Chattanooga
Miller-Motte Technical College – Clarksville
Nashville State Community College
Northeast State Technical Community College,
Blountville
Tennessee College of Applied Technology –
Crossville
Tennessee College of Applied Technology –
Hohenwald
Tennessee College of Applied Technology –
Jackson
Tennessee College of Applied Technology –
Knoxville
Tennessee College of Applied Technology –
Murfreesboro
TEXAS
Amarillo College
Angelina College, Lufkin
Austin Community College
Baptist Health System, San Antonio
Cisco College, Abilene
College of Health Care Professions –
Houston Northwest
Collin County Community College, McKinney
Concorde Career College – Dallas
Concorde Career College – Grand Prairie
Concorde Career College – San Antonio
Covenant Health System – Lubbock
Del Mar College, Corpus Christi
El Centro College, Dallas
El Paso Community College
Fortis Institute – Grand Prairie
Fortis Institute Houston North
Houston Community College
Howard College – San Angelo
Kilgore College
Lamar State College – Port Arthur
Lone Star College – Tomball
McLennan Community College, Waco
Medical Education & Training Campus,
Fort Sam Houston
North Central Texas College, Corinth
Paris Junior College
Saint Philip’s College, San Antonio
San Jacinto College, Pasadena
South Plains College, Lubbock
Tarrant County College – Trinity River East Campus,
Fort Worth
Temple College
Texas State Technical College, Harlingen
Trinity Valley Community College, Kaufman
Tyler Junior College
Vernon College, Wichita Falls
Virginia College - Austin
Wharton County Junior College
UTAH
Davis Applied Technology College, Kaysville
Dixie State College, Saint George
Salt Lake Community College, West Jordan
Stevens-Henager College, Ogden
VIRGINIA
American National University – Danville
American National University – Harrisonburg
Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk
Fortis College – Richmond
Jefferson College of Health Sciences, Roanoke
Lord Fairfax Community College, Middletown
Miller-Motte Technical College – Lynchburg
Piedmont Virginia Community College,
Charlottesville
Riverside School of Health Careers,
Newport News
Sentara College of Health Sciences, Chesapeake
WASHINGTON
Bellingham Technical College
Clover Park Technical College, Lakewood
Columbia Basin Community College, Pasco
Renton Technical College
Seattle Central Community College
Spokane Community College
Yakima Valley Community College, Tieton
WISCONSIN
Chippewa Valley Technical College, Eau Claire
Gateway Technical College, Kenosha
Madison Area Technical College
Mid-State Technical College, Marshfield
Milwaukee Area Technical College
Moraine Park Technical College, Fond Du Lac
Northcentral Technical College, Wausau
Northeast Wisconsin Technical College, Green Bay
Waukesha County Technical College, Pewaukee
Western Technical College, La Crosse
WEST VIRGINIA
Carver Career & Technical Education Center,
Charleston
James Rumsey Technical Institute, Martinsburg
Monongalia County Technical Education Center,
Morgantown
Southern West Virginia Community
& Technical College, Mount Gay
West Virginia Northern Community College,
Wheeling
West Virginia University at Parkersburg
WYOMING
Laramie County Community College, Cheyenne
8
Enter AST’s 2016 Facebook Photo
Contest between Sept. 15-27, 2016.
(Tip: Get some extra recognition on
campus by submitting the photo to
your marketing or communications
department to use on their social
media feed as well. Include a link
to your entry and ask the campus
community to vote.)
Print copies of the National Surgical
Technologists Week mini poster on
page 9 and post them on bulletin
boards around campus. Or decorate
a single bulletin board during the
week to help other students under-
stand surgical technologists. Post
pictures of surgical techs along with
AST’s professional code of ethics, the
definition of a certified surgical tech-
nologist, a job description, clinical
ladder brochure or any of the other
resources available on AST’s website.
Plan a Surgical-Themed Potluck.
Challenge your fellow techs to bring
a dish named after a surgery, supply
or instrument. Fluffs Salad = Fruit
salad with whipped cream. Dark
Chocolate Cupcakes become D&Cs.
Be creative!
Create a “Chalkwalk.” Buy colorful
chalk and decorate sidewalks around
campus with information about Na-
tional Surgical Technologists Week.
Plan ways for students to recognize
their surgical technologist precep-
tors during National Surgical Tech-
nologists Week. Decorate and sign a
poster for them. Take them surgical
gloves filled with wrapped candy or
other treats.
Set up a bake sale that educates the
campus community while raising
funds for ST students. Attach infor-
mation about surgical technologists
to the baggies or gloves filled with
treats.
Call your local TV station. If you’re
planning a celebration, invite your
local news crew. Local news shows
are often looking for ways to fill time
on slow news days. Just don’t be
disappointed if you’re bumped for a
breaking news story.
Check with your AST State Assem-
bly. Your local State Assembly may
be planning something for National
Surgical Technologists Week. Check
their website for ideas or activities.
Sea rch Twit ter p ost s for addit ional
idea s by t y ping # Su rgTe chWeek
into any we b browser a nd hit-
ting re turn . Don’t forget t o ta g
your socia l photos a nd post s wit h
# S urgTec hWe ek so th ey’ll show up
in the Twit ter f eed t oo.
Eight Great Ways to Celebrate
Awhile back, AST asked for submissions for this year’s National Surgical Technologists Week theme. Although many
responded, only one could be
chosen. Susan McNeely,
CST, an
instructor with the Milwaukee Area
Technical College, came up with
Get Hooked,” the winning theme.
My students huddle at the end
of each clinical day to discuss the
surgical cases they scrub,” says
McNeely. “Orthopedics is the
area I spent most of my operating
room days, so it remains a favorite
of mine to talk about. Reviewing
anatomy and the ortho retractors
became the inspiration for ‘get-
ting hooked,’ which I know these
students are.
McNeely started in the oper-
ating room in 1974. She began
teaching surgical technology in
1991 as a favor for a friend to cov-
er a 10-week maternity leave and
has been on faculty at Milwaukee
Area Technical College ever since.
“It’s so rewarding to watch
students grow and to mentor new
students,” she says. “I feel blessed
to have a career that keeps on
giving.
Educator Creates 2016 Theme
Eric Drankiewicz, Molly Flynn, Susan McNeely, CST, Jennifer Jones and Tifany Wolover are hooked on
celebrating National Surgical Technologists Week.
NATIONAL SURGICAL TECHNOLOGISTS WEEK
Nationa Surgica Technologist Wee
September 18-24, 2016
Sponsored by the Association
of Surgical Technologists
Hundreds of products are available at
WWW.SURGTECHWEEK.COM to help you
celebrate. Call 1-800-822-1923 and let us help you
find the right one at the best price.
SHOW YOUR
PRIDE DURING
TECH WEEK
www.surgtechweek.com
1
0
New technologies aside, the combination of intelligence
and a refined clinical skill set best prepares students for the
clinical setting. Self confidence, thick skin and drive, which
are hard to instill, contribute as well.
Identifying a Need for Improvement
Based on our program’s experience in the lab and our
feedback from our clinical sites, we know that the occa-
sional student comes to the OR without the confidence
and skills needed to competently complete OR tasks. Our
prior approach was rather traditional in natureteach-
ing the content and then testing for understanding, recall
and application. In the skillset areas we used a similar
approach, hoping the student would grasp the bridge
between the skills and the theory (i.e. do the students
demonstrate sterile technique and comprehend the infor-
mation surrounding its practice). In too many instances,
this wasn’t happening. While many students excel at both,
far too many students initially excel in only one of the two
areas. This prompted our decision to explore a way to help
improve our students’ abilities in both, while providing us
with a better way to identify problems and begin interven-
tion as soon as possible.
To improve the overall competency and proficiency of our
students, as well as help them understand their own weak-
nesses or limitations, a multi-feedback system was institut-
ed. Figure 1 demonstrates the former approach to teaching
and evaluation as well as our new multi-feedback model.
In our prior model, students would only receive weekly
clinical evaluations from the instructors. With our new
model, students receive:
• an enhanced weekly graded clinical evaluation
• weekly non-graded peer feedback
• weekly non-graded self-evaluations
student mentor and leader development opportunities
(from pairing weaker students with stronger students), and
regular use of video recordings in the clinical setups and
mock surgeries.
The increase of these formal and informal feedback loops
has resulted in earlier detection of problems and more ac-
curate remediation, and they have served as confidence
boosters among higher achievers because of the added
mentoring experiences.
Weekly Graded Clinical Evaluations
Previously we used the weekly graded evaluations to assess
where our students’ clinical skills were. Weekly evalua-
tions still are given once per week for 10 weeks; however,
they are now much more robust and include more detailed
feedback about skills and execution, as well as an overall
comparison to the peer group. The nature of the evaluation
changes each week as we add new clinical skills as well as
the peer and self-evaluations. The evaluations are meant to
be timely and specific to the student group’s progress with
the material. They are completed entirely online using either
an in-house learning management platform like Moodle,
or an online survey vendor, such as Survey Monkey. The
system allows all instructors to share in the management of
the information. This also allows instructors instant student
performance data, even if the student was previously work-
ing with a different instructor.
At the time of evaluation, data is entered directly into the
web-based system, eliminating data hardcopies. This also
reduces the total amount of time per student dedicated to
completing the online grading process. Paper copies are
only shared with the student. Student feedback about this
approach has been overwhelmingly positive. The students
like knowing exactly where they are clinically and what skills
they need to continue to work on. They like knowing how
they rate in their peer group, which motivates students to
work on skills that will help prepare them for the OR and
ultimately for employment in the hospital.
Weekly Non-Graded Peer Feedback
Previously, peer feedback had been used only periodically as
it was marginally helpful. This was primarily due to the fact
OLD
MODEL
Instructor
Evaluation
Teach
Perform
NEW
MODEL
Repeat
Perform
Teach
Are weekly
performance
goals met?
Yes:
Continue
positive
progress
No:
Intervene,
continue
monitoring
Instructor
Evaluation
Teach
Perform
Peer
feedback
Self
evaluation
Instructor
evaluation
Multi-
Rater
Feedback
• Positive
Practices
• Mentor others
• Volunteer
coaching
• Videos
• Shadowing
• Practice time
• Instructor
modeling
Evaluation Techniques in the Lab continued from page 1
Figure 1 compares a traditional approach to teaching and evaluation with the new multi-rater feedback model.
that when students were providing their feedback directly
to the other students, the peer pressure out weighed the
honesty and accuracy of the feedback. We have reinstated
the peer feedback; but feedback is submitted directly to
the instructor to provide additional information and insight
concerning performance.
Prior to beginning the peer feedback process, instructors
provide some initial training on the value and importance of
the feedback, as well as how to provide feedback profes-
sionally and appropriately. Additionally, this peer feedback
process begins to instill a level of quality assurance and even
peer-support and comradery, two skills that are invaluable
in the OR. These peer feedback opportunities have become
tremendously valuable to our classroom and our student
success.
Weekly Self-Evaluations
The addition of the weekly self-evaluation has enhanced
learning as well as served as a path to early detection of
performance problems. For the strong student, it serves as a
tool to help them continue to build their confidence in their
work. For the student who is struggling, the self-evaluation
has (unexpectedly) illuminated the difference between how
a student views/evaluates themselves versus the evaluation
and feedback from peers and the instructors. For example,
this approach has been extremely helpful in identifying
the students who believe they are doing everything right,
when they are not. The self-evaluation has been a valuable
tool, along with the use of the video recordings, to help the
instructor provide much earlier intervention to address these
performance problems. In fact, we believe that this ap-
proach has minimized the hard feelings that some students
have held previously towards their instructors when they
felt the instructors were, in their opinion, unjustifiably pick-
ing on them.
Pairing Weaker Students with Stronger Students
Purposely pairing weaker students with our stronger stu-
dents can happen somewhat naturally, because we always
seem to have some strong students with natural leadership
skills who just jump right into the role. Once we identify a
student who is struggling, (scoring less than 75% on their
clinical evaluations), we have them work on improving
those skills during free time in the lab with a student who
has mastered that particular skill. This is a real win-win op-
portunity as it helps the struggling student get extra prac-
tice and feedback and helps the stronger student continue
to improve their mentoring and leadership skills. In some
instances, students listen to their peers more than they
listen to their instructors.
Videos
After re-evaluating our prior video use and exploring how
other academic programs have used videos, we concluded
that regular video recordings and analysis could be valu-
able in assisting students who understand the classroom
work, but have problems executing the clinical skills. The
video recordings quickly proved helpful. In one situa-
tion we had a student who possessed all the classroom
knowledge, but struggled with the clinical skill part; her
body was not doing what her mind wanted it to. This was
extremely difficult for her as she quickly became frustrated
and discouraged. She wasn’t able to accurately reflect on
where she was making the mistakes. Instead, in her mind,
she was a failure.
The videos provided her with a different point of view.
She was able to watch her own performance and critique
the areas where she was making the mistakes. She was
learning how to recognize her errors as well as identify the
areas for improvement without any assistance from her
instructors. The videos helped her begin to visualize herself
doing the correct motions and activities in her mind before
it was her turn to be evaluated. By using this technique, her
performance continued to improve throughout the semes-
ter. This was a student who would not have been prepared
to go to the OR under our previous model. She would have
likely failed out of the program. However, under our current
model, she became our most improved student of the year
and is successfully working in the OR.
TheOther” Things
Sometimes the course content and the clinical skills are
solid, but the student possesses other behavior that sabo-
tages their own success, such as unmanaged nerves and
anxiety, poor stress management, a lack of attention to de-
tail, etc. To help students account for and address these is-
sues we have also included this aspect as part of the clinical
grade. Additionally, we role-play as surgeons in our mock
surgeries and let them know how their behavior would be
perceived as well as how their anxiety would affect the OR.
We have worked with them on visualization and any other
techniques that help people calm their nerves in stressful
situations.
As any educator or manager can attest, fear of litigation
is making it extremely difficult to fail students in a clinical
setting or fire employees without the proper documenta-
tion. While student success is our goal and priority, we also
know that surgical technology is not a profession for just
anyone. There are criteria that one must meet to perform
the job, and for very good reason. Implementing this pro-
gram has not only enhanced our student’s success, but it
has increased our ability to more accurately document our
students’ performance progress.
As surgical technology educators, we want all of our stu-
dents to be entering the workplace with an increasing level
of competence. We have to make sure that we would feel
comfortable having our students work on our loved ones.
That is the standard we keep in our mind when preparing
our students for the OR.
About the Authors:
Angie Wachter, CST, is an instructor and the clinical coor-
dinator of surgical technology at College of Western Idaho.
She was also a presenter at AST’s 2016 Instructors Forum
in Houston. Robert Lion is an assistant professor of human
resource development at Idaho State University.
This article was adapted from “Multi-Rater Feedback: Improving
Students’ Readiness for the OR,” first published in the March
2016 issue of Techniques magazine. Reprinted with permission.
11
2016 National Honor Society Inductees
Congratulations to these outstanding students!
JANUARY 2016
Jan-16 Ashley Flowers .......New England Institute of Technology, East Greenwich, RI
FEBRUARY 2016
Kyle Charles Jervis ..............Maine Medical Center, South Portland, ME
MARCH 2016
Melissa S. Bruso .................Delta College, University Center, MI
Melanie L. McKee
..............Harrisburg Area Community College, Harrisburg, PA
Isaac Wilson
.......................Jefferson College of Health Sciences, Roanoke, VA
Nancy F. Turner
..................Madison Area Technical College, Madison, WI
Danielle M. Jaszarowsk
.....University of Saint Francis, Fort Wayne, IN
APRIL 2016
Marjorie Griffith .................Columbus State Community College, Columbus, OH
Keara Hofheins
................... Dixie State University, Saint George, UT
Cristine Bailey.....................Nassau Community College, Garden City, NY
Jennifer Sturm
....................Nassau Community College, Garden City, NY
Russell Gaas
......................Temple College, Temple, TX
Nicholas Lane
..................... Temple College, Temple, TX
Stacie Monrial
...................Temple College, Temple, TX
James Stephen....................Temple College, Temple, TX
MAY 2016
Monica Monk ....................Concorde Career College, Dallas, TX
Rebekah Fraley
................... James Rumsey Technical Institute, Martinsburg, WV
Tarrah McCusker
................James Rumsey Technical Institute, Martinsburg, WV
Amber Mathewson
............Miller-Motte Technical College, Charleston, SC
Kelly Hoelz
.........................Miller-Motte Technical College, North Charleston, SC
Therese Napoli
...................Ozarks Technical Community College, Springfield, MO
Amanda Tainter
.................. Ozarks Technical Community College, Springfield, MO
Donna E. Calli
....................Ulster Boces Adult Education, Port Ewen, NY
Phoenix Yee
.......................Ulster Boces Adult Education, Port Ewen, NY
Marsha Ledbetter
............... Ulster Boces Adult Education, Port Ewen, NY
Tanaya Daniels
...................Ulster Boces Adult Education, Port Ewen, NY
Ericka Benitex
.....................Ulster Boces Adult Education, Port Ewen, NY
Brian Keng
.......................... Ulster Boces Adult Education, Port Ewen, NY
Stephanie Cordner
..............Ulster Boces Adult Education, Port Ewen, NY
Martin Weathers
................Western Dakota Technical Institute, Rapid City, SD
Taylor Brooke Pollreisz
........ Western Dakota Technical Institute, Rapid City, SD
Cassandra Lee Brinker
........Western Dakota Technical Institute, Rapid City, SD
April Slayton
....................... Western Dakota Technical Institute, Rapid City, SD
Amanda Jane Keller
............Western Dakota Technical Institute, Rapid City, SD
Eric A. Snoozy
....................Western Dakota Technical Institute, Rapid City, SD
12