Human Resources
ETH Zürich
8092 Zürich
ETH Human Resources Beispiel Letter of Reference, 04.09.2013 Seite 1 von 2
Introduction
A Letter of Reference / Letter of Recommendation testifies to an individual’s skills, personal characteristics and work. Like an
employer’s reference, it is a formal document. Unlike a reference, a Letter of Recommendation has an addressee, like a letter. If the
addressee is known, they are addressed by name. If the letter is addressed to a committee, it begins “Dear hiring committee”, but if
the addressee is not known, then it begins “To whom it may concern” or “Dear Sir or Madam”.
In the first sentence of the Letter of
Recommendation, express your
basic opinion about the skills, work
and personal characteristics of the
person you are describing. Mention
in the first section the reason
for/purpose of the letter, for example
if it is a recommendation for an
academic course of study or a
recommendation for a job.
This letter is in reference to (very low)
This serves as a letter of reference for (fairly low)
I am pleased to write this letter of recomendation for (Average)
I am pleased to recommend (Fairly high)
It is a genuine pleasure and honor for me to recommend (very high)
State your relationship with the
person for whom you are writing the
Letter of Recommendation: what
is/was your position in relation to
them, how long have you known
them/did you know them for.
I have known John Doe since … in my role as his PhD thesis advisor at..
I first met Janet Smith when she came to interview for the position of PhD Student working on a
joint project between myself and the QM Lab. Both the QM Lab colleagues and I had an instantly
positive impression of her and both, strangely, had to keep reminding ourselves that she was
interviewing for a PhD position and not a postdoc.
This section consists of 2 to 6
paragraphs. The length depends on
how long and how closely you
worked with the employee. First give
a general overview of the skills,
potential, personal characteristics
and behaviour of the person you are
describing.
During his studies, John Doe demonstrated a high level of scientific curiosity and a strong
aptitude to practical problem solving.
Janet was an excellent PhD student, able to work very well both independently and in a team.
James was hard-working, diligent, and capable of running many activities at the same time.
What I have particularly valued in Amy, in addition to the general qualities listed above, is her
knack for disassembling a problem into its component parts, and tackling these parts in a
rigorous, quantitative manner.