7
Major challenges: (a) expanding and enhancing generation and dissemination of disaster risk
information (b) integrating disaster risk reduction in formal and informal education, (c) enhancing
research and innovation in disaster management.
2.2.4 Reducing development risk factors
Status: Rain-dependent agrarian and primary-commodity based economies and poverty contribute
to the high vulnerability to natural hazards in the sub-region. Countries have pursued pro-poor
growth policies but some policies have not enhanced the resilience status of the sub-region while
food insecurity persists. The ECOWAS Agriculture Policy (ECOWAP) is aimed at sustainable
food security and poverty reduction partly by reducing famine and other disasters triggered by
natural hazards through interventions in early warning, hazard management, post-conflict food
crises and other areas. National disaster management frameworks also emphasize food security as a
requirement for disaster risk reduction through several interventions
vii
. To further manage natural
hazards and environmental degradation, countries have implemented interventions to protect and
better safeguard the natural capital base but many factors, including lack of effective legislation,
hamper compliance.
National authorities have developed policies to regulate and ensure integrated land resource use but
physical planning and economic planning are not integrated. Consequently, the regulatory
framework for land use planning and physical development is weak while compliance with
settlement planning and development policies, controls, and standards is low. This is partly because
national disaster management policies do not clearly aim to integrate disaster risk reduction in
national development policies, planning and implementation processes. Also, many national poverty
reduction strategies do not directly link with disaster risk reduction.
Major challenges: These include: (a) improving the design and enforcement of public regulations
on physical development; (b) meeting food security challenges with existing drought and
desertification management programmes; (c) addressing regional, trans-boundary and emerging
risks, such as crop pest infestation, migratory livestock herding, and, invasive alien species; (d)
coordinating and ensuring complementarities between disaster risk reduction and conflict
management; (e) expand public-private partnerships; (f) enhance and expand measures for social
protection.
2.2.5 Strengthening preparedness and response
Status: Preparedness planning involves contingency planning, early warning and evacuation.
Countries have developed national contingency and evacuation plans but the quality varies
viii
. Also,
countries are unable to rehearse contingency plans
ix
. Several countries, including Benin, Burkina
Faso, Cote d’Ivoire, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Mali, Mauritania, Niger and Togo have
completed Inter Agency Contingency Plans (IACPs) with OCHA, UNHCR, UNICEF and other
agencies of the United Nations system to coordinate the assistance of development agencies to
national response efforts but the institutional and physical infrastructure for emergency management
remains limited. For example, most countries lack central facilities for coordination, command and
control of response interventions in emergencies. The recent development of a mission control
centre for emergency management by Nigeria offers an example of good practice. Early warning
systems contribute positively to emergency preparation and response in the sub-region but the