6
Where any of the above listed conditions is present on a project site, the project team should
notify and discuss with NZGBC to determine whether this affects the project’s eligibility. If the
development does not require a Resource Consent for activities in relation to potential impacts
to significant ecological/natural areas (e.g., vegetation removal, reclamation or matters under
the National Environmental Standard for Freshwater), then it is deemed eligible under this
Conditional Requirement subject to further assessment.
24.1.1 Conditional Requirement: Ecological Value
The evidence confirming that the site prior to development meets the requirements may be in
the form of:
• Correspondence from the relevant local Council OR a qualified Ecologist confirming that
the site prior to development meets the criteria; OR
• Local planning maps with relevant overlays applied; OR
• A letter from the local Territorial Authority; OR
• A qualified Environmental Specialist’s report; OR
• An Assessment of Environmental Effects for Resource Consent approved by Local
Council, and clearly demonstrating that the site is not ecologically significant; OR
• If any ecologically significant sites are potentially affected, the project must
provide evidence which sets out how any impacts will be mitigated through avoidance or
minimisation, at least to a degree that adverse ecological effects are less than minor
(prior to any restoration, offsetting or compensation measures) having regard to Section
6c of the Resource Management Act and the provisions of the relevant territorial
authority Plan. If any less than minor effects are predicted then restoration, offsetting or
compensation measures resulting in a net gain must be demonstrated for the
biodiversity values for which the area is designated as ecologically significant. If no
adverse effects are predicted then no mitigation is required.
Regardless of the evidence type supplied, if it is clear that either no sites of ecological
significance are present or that adverse effects can be avoided altogether then the project will
be deemed eligible. If further justification of ecologically significant status or potential effects
mitigation is required, expert evidence may be requested during the assessment phase to
demonstrate the requirement can be met.
24.1.2 Conditional Requirement: Highly Productive Land
Evidence of the LUC class can be provided by referring to the NZ Land Resource Inventory
which maps the LUC distributions across New Zealand at a scale of 1:50,000
https://lris.scinfo.org.nz/layer/48076-nzlri-land-use-capability-2021/
Note that Highly Productive Land (HPL) is defined as land which is classed as either Land Use
Capability (LUC) class 1, 2, or 3. This covers land of the highest capability and versatility to
support primary production. HPL excludes all urban zoned areas and all future urban zoned
areas in District Plans.