1
Revised October 31
st
, 2023 www.nature.com/lsa
Guide for Authors
ARTICLE TYPES 1
PREPARATION OF ARTICLES 2
HOW TO SUBMIT 7
POST-ACCEPTANCE 7
PUBLICATION CHARGES 7
EDITORIAL POLICIES 8
FURTHER INFORMATION 12
ARTICLE TYPES
Article Description
Abstract
Word Limit
References
Article
The article denotes a relatively complete, comprehensive report
of original research. An article usually has a fairly complex
narrative that is based on multiple techniques and/or
approaches. Article must contain the following components in
the order stated as body section.
Introduction
Results
Discussion
Materials and methods
Please see section of “PREPARATION OF ARTICLES for
further details.
Unstructured
abstract;
max word limit:
250
6 000 words
excluding
abstract,
references,
figures and
tables
Max of 50.
Please use as
current as
possible.
Editorial
The editors invite editorials to discuss a topical issue or a paper
published in the journal and set the problems addressed by the
paper in the wider context of the field. These are usually
commissioned, but unsolicited editorial submissions are
considered for publication.
No abstract
required
1 000 words
excluding
references
Max of 15
News & Views
News and Views are by prior arrangement only, although
prospective authors are welcome to make proposals. They may
be linked to articles in LSA or they may focus on papers of
exceptional significance that are published elsewhere. News
and Views are not peer-reviewed.
Unstructured
abstract;
max word limit:
50
500-1500 words
Max of 12
Perspective
Perspective paper denotes a scholarly discussion of one recent
major breakthrough or summary of a few new progresses to
cohesively point out the emerging opportunities in light
sciences, technologies and applications.
Perspective papers may be opinionated but should remain
balanced; therefore the editor may recommend an influential
researcher in the field to co-author a perspective article and to
stimulate discussion and consideration of new approaches to
investigation and understanding of a commonly interested
Unstructured
abstract;
max word limit:
250
2 000 words
excluding
abstract,
references,
figures and
tables
Max of 20,
not
including
reference to
the original
article.
2
Revised October 31
st
, 2023 www.nature.com/lsa
research topic.
Research Highlight
Research-highlight denotes an article to convey a summary of
achievements of selected new research papers. It explains a
complex, important piece of research in a way that makes it
enticingly comprehensible to all readers. Research highlight is
not peer-reviewed.
Several stringent guidelines should be followed as below:
The headline must consist of a brief generic subject
identifier followed by a short description. No more than 5
words in total.
Considering non-expert readers, some concepts and
technical terms should be simplified.
No more than three authors are allowed for author
information.
Neither abstract, references, figures nor tables are required.
No abstract
required
180 words
No reference
required
Review Article
Review Articles cover a focused area on the advancing edge of
optics and photonics and provide a balanced view of current
research that can be understood by researchers outside that
specialty.
Review Articles do not require 'Materials and methods' or
'Results and discussion' sections but can be structured using
short topical headings.
Review Articles will be subject to the established review
process.
Unstructured
abstract;
max word limit:
250
6 000 words
excluding
abstract,
references,
figures and
tables
Max of 100
Word limit
Word limits are provided for guidance only. The Editors will consider submissions that exceed the recommended limit,
subject to feedback received during peer review.
PREPARATION OF ARTICLES
Cover letter
Each manuscript must be accompanied by a cover letter,
including statements that:
All authors agree with the submission;
The work has not been published or submitted for
publication elsewhere, either completely or in part,
or in another form or language;
No materials are reproduced from another source
(if there is material in your manuscript which has
been reproduced from another source, please
change this item to 'there are some materials which
are reproduced from other sources. We have gotten
authorizations from the copyright holders to use
them, and have included these authorizations with
this submission');
Conflict of Interest Statement
Organization of manuscript
We do not request manuscripts to be formatted in LSA’s
style for submissions, as long as the study is described in
a fashion that is suitable for editorial assessment and
peer review.
Please use a common word-processing package (such as
Microsoft Word) for the manuscript text. Supplementary
Information should be supplied as a separate file in
word or PDF format, preferably in Word format, while
not combined in the manuscript file.
Authors should follow the guidelines outlined below,
which also must be followed when submitting files for
revisions.
Manuscript should be provided in a single file, figures
3
Revised October 31
st
, 2023 www.nature.com/lsa
and tables should be embedded into the file at proper
position. If the manuscript is accepted in principle,
Microsoft Word file is required. The manuscript text file
should include the following parts, in order: a title page
with author affiliations and contact information (the
corresponding author should be identified with an
asterisk); the sections required for each content type (see
information for different article types) then References,
Acknowledgements (optional), Author Contributions,
Conflict of Interest statement. Footnotes to the text are
not allowed and any such material should be
incorporated into the text as parenthetical matter.
Manuscript should include continuous line number.
(i) Title page
The title page should include a succinct title (less than
200 characters); the full names of all authors including
their given names; the affiliations (including city, state,
country and zip code) of all authors; the official email
addresses of all authors, and the full contact details of
the corresponding author (including telephone number).
(ii) Abstract
A brief abstract (maximum 250 words) should state the
purpose, basic procedures, main findings and principal
conclusions of the study. The abstract should not contain
abbreviations or references and should not be structured.
(iii) Introduction
The Introduction should summarize the rationale for the
study and outline pertinent background material. The
Introduction should not contain either results or
conclusions.
(iv) Results
The Results should be presented in a logical sequence in
the text, tables and figures; repetitive presentation of the
same data in different forms should be avoided. The
Results should not include material appropriate to the
Discussion.
(v) Discussion
The Discussion should not reiterate Results, but rather
should consider them in relation to any hypotheses
advanced in the Introduction. This may include an
evaluation of methodology and the relationship of new
information to the existing body of knowledge in that
field.
(vi) Materials and methods
Materials and Methods should be described in sufficient
detail to allow the experimental work to be reproduced
in another laboratory, and to leave the reader in no
doubt as to how the results were derived.
Availability of data, materials and methods: An
inherent principle of publication is that others should be
able to replicate and build upon the authors' published
claims. A condition of publication is that authors are
required to make materials, data, code, and associated
protocols promptly available to readers without undue
qualifications.
Submission of a manuscript to Light: Science &
Applications implies that materials described in the
manuscript, including all relevant raw data, will be
freely available to any scientist wishing to use them for
non-commercial purposes, without breaching participant
confidentiality.
Data availability statements: Data availability
statements provide a statement about where data
supporting the results reported in a published article can
be found - including, where applicable, hyperlinks to
publicly archived datasets analysed or generated during
the study. For all original research articles, we require
the provision of data availability statements, examples
and details can be seen on our data policy web page. The
statement should be placed at the end of the Methods
section (titled, ‘Data availability’), after the code
availability statement if one is present. For further
guidance, please refer to the Data availability and data
citations policy information and Frequently Asked
Questions (FAQs).
Light: Science & Applications strongly encourages that all
datasets on which the conclusions of the paper rely
should be available to readers. We encourage authors to
ensure that their datasets are either deposited in publicly
available repositories (where available and appropriate)
or presented in the main manuscript or additional
supporting files whenever possible. Please see Springer
Nature’s information on recommended repositories.
Data should be submitted to discipline-specific,
community-recognised repositories where possible. In
cases where a suitable discipline-specific resource does
not exist, data may be submitted to a generalist data
repository, including any generalist data repositories
provided by universities, funders or institutions for their
affiliated researchers.
Where a widely established research community
expectation for data archiving in public repositories
exists, submission to a community-endorsed, public
repository is mandatory. Persistent identifiers (such as
4
Revised October 31
st
, 2023 www.nature.com/lsa
DOIs and accession numbers) for relevant datasets must
be provided in the paper.
(vii ) Acknowledgements
Authors should acknowledge the source of financial
grants and other funding, and declare any industrial
links or affiliations. The contribution of colleagues or
institutions should also be acknowledged. Personal
thanks and thanks to anonymous reviewers should not
be included.
(viii)Conflict of interest
A conflict of interest statement must be included for each
contributing author. Please see the Conflict of Interest
guidelines in the Editorial Policies section for more
information and for guidelines on what constitutes a
conflict of interest.
(ix) References
References: All necessary references should be included
in order to credit previous work directly relevant to the
article. References should follow the Nature style
available in most reference management software. In the
text they should appear as superscript numbers starting
at 1 and at the end of the paper they should be listed
(double-spaced) in numerical order corresponding to the
order of citation in the text. Where a reference is to
appear next to a number in the text, for example,
following an equation, chemical formula or biological
acronym, citations should be written as (ref. X) and not
as superscript. Example: “detectable levels of
endogenous Bcl-2 (ref. 3), as confirmed by western blot.”
All authors should be listed for papers with up to five
authors; for papers with more than five authors, the first
only should be listed, followed by et al. Abbreviations
for titles of medical periodicals should conform to those
used in the latest edition of Index Medicus. The first and
last page numbers for each reference should be
provided. Abstracts must be identified as such. Papers in
press and preprints hosted on a recognized server may
be included in the list of references.
Examples:
Journal article, up to five authors:
Belkaid, Y. & Rouse, B. T. Natural regulatory T cells in
infectious disease. Nat. Immunol. 6, 353360 (2005).
Journal article, e-pub ahead of print:
Bonin, M. et al. F-ara-A pharmacokinetics during
reduced-intensity conditioning therapy with fludarabine
and busulfan. Bone Marrow Transplant.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1705565 (2007).
Journal article, in press:
Gallardo, R. L., Juneja, H. S. & Gardner, F. H. Normal
human marrow stromal cells induce clonal growth of
human malignant T-lymphoblasts. Int. J. Cell Cloning (in
the press).
Complete book:
Atkinson, K. et al. (eds) Clinical Bone Marrow and Blood
Stem Cell Transplantation (Cambridge Univ. Press,
2004).
Chapter in book:
Harley, N. H. & Vivian, L. in Mechanisms of Disease 4th
edn, Vol. 2 (eds Sodeman, W. A. & Smith, A.) Ch. 3
(Saunders, 1974).
Published conference proceedings:
Smith, Y. (ed.) Proc. 1st National Conference on Porous
Sieves (Butterworth-Heinemann, London, 1997).
Paper in published conference proceedings:
Jones, X. Zeolites and synthetic mechanisms. In Proc. 1st
National Conference on Porous Sieves (ed. Smith, Y.) 16
27 (ButterworthHeinemann, London, 1997).
Abstract:
Feig, S. A. et al. Bone marrow transplantation for
neuroblastoma. Exp. Hematol. 13, abstr. 102 (1985).
Preprint:
Starrfelt, J. & Liow, L.H. How many dinosaur species
were there? Fossil bias and true richness estimated using
a Poisson sampling model (TRiPS). Preprint at
http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2015/12/04/025940
(2015).
Research dataset:
Hao, Z., AghaKouchak, A., Nakhjiri, N. & Farahmand,
A. Global Integrated Drought Monitoring and Prediction
System (GIDMaPS) Data sets. figshare.
http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.853801 (2014).
Dissertation/Thesis
Young, W. R. Effects of Different Tree Species on Soil
Properties in Central New York. MSc thesis, Cornell
Univ. (1981).
Scientific report
Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre. Internal
Displacement: Global Overview of Trends and
Developments in 2006. 6-8 (IDMC, 2007)
Patent
Pagedas, A. C. Reusable laparoscopic retrieval
mechanism. US patent 6,387,102 (2002).
5
Revised October 31
st
, 2023 www.nature.com/lsa
Materials online
Manaster, J. Sloth squeak. Scientific American Blog
Network http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/psi-
vid/2014/04/09/sloth-squeak (2014).
Artwork Guidance
General Figure Guidelines
Use distinct colours with comparable visibility and
consider colour-blind individuals by avoiding the use of
red and green for contrast. Recoloring primary data,
such as fluorescence images, to colour-safe combinations
such as green and magenta, turquoise and red, yellow
and blue or other accessible colour palettes is strongly
encouraged. Use of the rainbow colour scale should be
avoided. Use solid colour for filling objects and avoid
hatch patterns. Avoid background shading. Figures
divided into parts should be labelled with a lower-case,
boldface 'a', 'b', etc. in the top left-hand corner. Labelling
of axes, keys and so on should be in 'sentence case' (first
word capitalized only) with no full stop. Units must
have a space between the number and the unit, and
follow the nomenclature common to your field. Spaces,
not commas should be used to separate thousands.
Unusual units or abbreviations should be spelled out in
full, or defined in the legend.
Final Figure Submission Guidelines
Should your manuscript be accepted, for manuscript
production, figures should be prepared and submitted
following guidelines below.
Each figure should be saved in a separate file.
Figures including multiple parts (e.g. Fig.1a, 1b, 1c)
should be saved in a single file (e.g. Figure1a-c). The
figure number should be placed above each figure.
Figure legends should be inserted in the article’s
text file.
Figures should be supplied in their original vector
format to ensure they are completely independent
of resolution and all elements in the figures are
editable. All figures need to be drawn and
generated directly from a vector drawing software
(Adobe Illustrator, Corel Draw, CAD, etc).
Following figure formats are acceptable:
AI
EPS
PS
PDF
For vector graphics with imported photos or images
produced by optical instrument or camera, please
make sure that each individual photo/image
imported into vector tools and the final vector
graphic meet the following requirements:
Resolution: 300+ dpi
Width: 2000+ pixels
Raster graphics (JPG, JPEG, PNG, etc) should be
completely redrawn using vector tools rather than
opening them with a vector software and saving
them as a vector format.
The size of each figure file need to be within 100 MB
Use the same typeface (Arial, Helvetica or Times
New Roman) for all figures. Use symbol font for
Greek letters.
Display items that contain chemical structures
should be produced using ChemDraw or a similar
program. All chemical compounds must be
assigned a bold, Arabic numeral in the order in
which the compounds are presented in the
manuscript text.
Images may be rotated or scaled, but this must be
the same in the x and y dimensions
Contrast and brightness can be adjusted, but this
must be uniform across the entire image, and must
not result in the loss of any feature, band or spot.
The background should still be visible
If lanes are removed, and once separate parts of an
image are joined together, a black, white or grey line
should indicate clearly where the image was cut
If black borders are drawn around the image, the
lines should correspond to all edges where the
image was cut
Protein molecular weights or DNA fragment sizes
should be indicated for all figure panels showing
gel electrophoresis
Graphs, Histograms and Statistics
Error bars must be described in the figure
legend
Axes on graphs should extend to zero, except
for log axes
Statistical analyses (including error bars and p
values) should only be shown for
independently repeated experiments, and must
not be shown for replicates of a single
experiment
The number of times an experiment was
repeated (N) must be stated in the legend
(x) Tables
Tables should be labelled sequentially as Table 1, Table
2, etc. Each table should be numbered, titled and cited in
6
Revised October 31
st
, 2023 www.nature.com/lsa
the text. Reference to table footnotes should be made by
using Arabic numerals. Tables should not duplicate the
content of the text. They should consist of at least two
columns, and each column should have a heading.
Authors should ensure that the data in the tables are
consistent with those cited in the relevant places in the
text, totals add up correctly, and percentages have been
calculated correctly.
If a table or figure has been published before, the authors
must obtain written permission to reproduce the
material in both print and electronic formats from the
copyright owner and submit it with the manuscript. This
also applies to quotes, illustrations and other materials
taken from previously published works not in the public
domain. The original source should be cited in the figure
caption or table footnote. Please note the citations in the
article should be in the below order: Text > Tables >
Figure legends > boxes. e.g. the text end with citation 36,
then citation in Tables should start with 37, likewise for
figures.
House Style
As the electronic submission will provide the basic
material for typesetting, it is important that papers are
prepared in the general editorial style of the journal
1. Do not make rules thinner than 1 pt (0.36 mm)
2. Use a coarse hatching pattern rather than
shading for tints in graphs
3. Color should be distinct when being used as an
identifying tool
4. Use SI units throughout
5. Spaces, not commas should be used to separate
thousands
6. Abbreviations should be preceded by the words
for which they stand in the first instance of use
and should not be used for terms used fewer
than 4 times
7. Text should be double spacing with a wide
margin
8. Use a common word-processing package (such
as Microsoft Word) for the text
9. If you submit raw data, this can be done in Excel,
or tab/comma delimited format
10. At first mention of a manufacturer the town,
(state if USA) and country should be provided
Supplementary information
Supplementary information is peer-reviewed material
directly relevant to the conclusions of an article that
cannot be included in the printed version owing to space
or format constraints. It is posted on the journal's
website and linked to the article when the article is
published and may consist of data files, graphics, movies
or extensive tables.
The article must be complete and self-explanatory
without the supplementary information. Supplementary
information enhances a reader’s understanding of the
manuscript but is not essential to that understanding.
Supplementary information must be supplied via eJP,
the electronic manuscript submission and tracking
system for peer review. On acceptance the final version
of the peer reviewed supplementary information should
be submitted in its FINAL form with the accepted
manuscript. It can neither be altered, nor added to, after
the paper has been accepted for publication. It is not
subedited and will appear online exactly as originally
submitted.
If supplementary files are movies, animators, or other
separate non-text files, author should submit a text file to
explain them (alternatively include a legend list as a
separate supplementary file or combined them into text
supplementary file).
Authors should include the text 'Supplementary
information accompanies the manuscript on the Light:
Science & Applications website
(http://www.nature.com/lsa)' at the end of the article
and before the references.
Accepted supplementary file format is as follows,
Quick Time files (.mov)
Graphical image files (.gif)
HTML files (.html)
MPEG movie files (.mpg)
JPEG image files (.jpg)
Sound files (.wav)
Acrobat files (.pdf)
MS Word documents (.doc)
Postscript files (.ps)
MS Excel spreadsheet documents (.xls)
Plain ASCII text (.txt)
TeX or LaTeX (.tex) files
File sizes must be as small as possible, so that they can
be downloaded quickly. Images should not exceed 640 x
480 pixels (approximately 23 x 17 cm at 72 dpi), and we
would recommend 480 x 360 pixels as the maximum
frame size for movies. We also recommend a frame rate
of 15 frames per second. If applicable to the presentation
of the supplementary information, use a 256-color
7
Revised October 31
st
, 2023 www.nature.com/lsa
palette. Please consider the use of lower specification for
all of these points if the supplementary information can
still be represented clearly. Our recommended
maximum data rate is 150 KB/s.
HOW TO SUBMIT
Online Submission
We only accept manuscript submission via our online
manuscript submission system. Before submitting a
manuscript, authors are encouraged to consult both our
Editorial Policies and the Submission Instructions for our
online manuscript submission system. If you have not
already done so, please register for an account with our
online manuscript system. You will be able to monitor
the status of your manuscript online throughout the
editorial process.
Submission of Revisions
Authors submitting a revised manuscript after review
are asked to include the following:
(1) A rebuttal letter, indicating point-by-point how
you have addressed the comments raised by the
reviewers. If you disagree with any of the points raised,
please provide adequate justification in your letter.
(2) A marked-up version of the manuscript that
highlights changes made in response to the reviewers'
comments in order to aid the Editors and reviewers.
POST-ACCEPTANCE
Publication
Publishing Open Access will mean the paper is freely
accessible online immediately upon publication. By
paying this charge authors are permitted to post the
final, published PDF of their article on a website,
institutional repository or other free public server,
immediately on publication.
Open access articles are published under a CC BY license
(Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License). The CC BY license is preferred by many
research funding bodies. It allows for maximum
dissemination and re-use of open access materials: users
are free to share (copy, distribute and transmit) and
remix (adapt) the contribution including for commercial
purposes, providing they attribute the contribution in
the manner specified by the author or licensor (read the
full legal code).
Under Creative Commons licenses, authors retain
copyright in their work. Authors should note that some
funders require papers to be published under a specific
license and so should check the funder mandate to
ensure compliance.
Proofs
The corresponding author will receive an e-mail
containing a URL linking to the proofing site. Proof
corrections must be returned within 48 hours of receipt.
Failure to do so may result in delayed publication.
Extensive changes cannot be made at this stage.
Self-Archiving
Authors are encouraged to submit the final version of
the accepted, peer-reviewed manuscript to their funding
body's archive for public release immediately upon
publication and to deposit the final version on their
institution’s repository. Authors should cite the
publication reference and DOI number on any deposited
version, and provide a link from it to the published
article on the nature.com website.
This policy complements the policies of the US National
Institutes of Health, the Wellcome Trust and other
research funding bodies around the world. Springer
Nature recognises the efforts of funding bodies to
increase access of the research they fund, and strongly
encourages authors to participate in such efforts.
PUBLICATION CHARGES
In order to publish in Light: Science & Applications,
authors of accepted articles are required to pay an article
processing charge (APC). The APC is determined at the
date of acceptance. Check the APCs and Springer
Nature’s related services and policies at:
https://www.nature.com/lsa/open-access#apc.
8
Revised October 31
st
, 2023 www.nature.com/lsa
EDITORIAL POLICIES
Submission to the Light: Science & Applications implies
that all authors have seen and approved the full
manuscript.
To avoid unnecessary delays in the review process,
please consider the following policies carefully before
you submit your manuscript.
Authorship
Requirements for all categories of articles largely
conform to the standard practices of life sciences
journals. A manuscript will be considered for
publication with the understanding that:
1. all named authors have agreed to its submission
2. it is not currently being considered for
publication by another journal
3. if the paper is accepted, it will not subsequently
be published in the same or similar form in any
language without the consent of publisher
Each author must have contributed sufficiently to the
intellectual content of the submission. The
corresponding author should list all authors and their
contributions to the work. Any changes to the author list
after submission, such as a change in the order of the
authors, or the deletion or addition of authors, must be
approved by a signed letter from every author. The
corresponding author must confirm that he or she has
had full access to the data in the study and final
responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
To qualify as a contributing author, one must meet all of
the following criteria:
1. Conceived and/or designed the work that led
to the submission, acquired data, and/or
played an important role in interpreting the
results
2. Drafted or revised the manuscript
3. Approved the final version
Other individuals who made direct contributions to the
work but do not meet all of the above criteria may be
recognized in the Acknowledgements section of the
manuscript.
Professional writers and industry employees can be
contributors. Their roles, affiliations, and potential
conflicts of interest should be included in the author list
or noted in the Acknowledgments and/or Contributors
section concurrent with their contribution to the work
submitted. Signed statements from any medical writers
or editors declaring that they have given permission to
be named as an author, as a contributor, or in the
Acknowledgments section is also required. Failure to
acknowledge these contributors can be considered
inappropriate, which conflicts with the editorial policy of
the Light: Science & Applications.
Plagiarism and fabrication
Plagiarism is when an author attempts to pass off
someone else's work as his or her own. Duplicate
publication, sometimes called self-plagiarism, occurs
when an author reuses substantial parts of his or her
own published work without providing the appropriate
references. Plagiarism without dishonest intent is
relatively frequent, for example, when an author reuses
parts of an introduction from an earlier paper. Because
of some confusion as to the appropriate use of other
authors' writing, we offer the following guideline in
addition to the normal principles regarding plagiarism:
if more than 5 consecutive words are taken verbatim
from the text of another publication (including the
authors’ own work), this fact should be indicated by the
use of inverted commas, as well as citation of the
original source. It is not appropriate to make trivial
changes to the wording instead. This rule can be relaxed
slightly for descriptions of methodology from the
authors’ own papers, or for common phrases. If
plagiarism is found, the journal will contact the author
and, in some cases, the author's institute and funding
agencies. The paper containing the plagiarism will be
marked on each page of the PDF, and depending on the
extent of the plagiarism, the paper may be formally
retracted. CrossCheck is a multi-publisher initiative to
screen published and submitted content for originality.
Light: Science & Applications uses CrossCheck to detect
instances of overlapping and similar text in submitted
manuscripts. To find out more about CrossCheck visit
http://www.crossref.org/crosscheck.html
Duplicate publication
Material submitted to the journal must be original and
not published or submitted for publication elsewhere in
any language. This policy applies to material submitted
elsewhere while the contribution to Light: Science &
9
Revised October 31
st
, 2023 www.nature.com/lsa
Applications is under consideration.
Authors submitting a manuscript should notify the
editor(s) if part of their contribution has appeared or will
appear elsewhere, or if any related material is under
consideration or in press elsewhere.
If a submission contains a figure that is published
elsewhere or that is copyrighted, the author must
provide documentation that the previous publisher or
copyright holder has given permission for the figure to
be re-published. The editors consider all material in
good faith, and assume that the journal has full
permission to publish every part of the submitted
material, including illustrations.
Permissions
If a table or figure has been published before, the authors
must obtain written permission to reproduce the
material in electronic format from the copyright owner
and submit it with the manuscript. This follows for
illustrations and other materials taken from previously
published works not in the public domain. The original
source should be cited in the figure caption or table
footnote. Permission to reproduce material can usually
be obtained through the Copyright Clearance Center.
Clinical Trials
As defined by the International Committee of Medical
Journal Editors (ICMJE), a clinical trial is any research
project that prospectively assigns human subjects to
intervention and comparison groups to study the cause-
and effect relationship between a medical intervention
and a health outcome. A medical intervention is any
intervention used to modify a health outcome and
includes but is not limited to drugs, surgical procedures,
devices, behavioural treatments, and process-of-care
changes. A trial must have at least one prospectively
assigned concurrent control or comparison group in
order to trigger the requirement for registration.
Nonrandomised trials are not exempt from the
registration requirement if they meet the above criteria.
When reporting experiments on human subjects, please
indicate whether the procedures were in accordance
with the ethical standards of the responsible committee
on human experimentation (institutional or regional) or
with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 (as revised in
1983). Include Institutional Review Board or Animal
Care and Use Committee approvals.
All clinical trials must be registered in a public registry
prior to submission. The journal follows the trials
registration policy of the ICMJE (www.icmje.org) and
considers only trials that have been appropriately
registered before submission, regardless of when the
trial closed to enrolment. Acceptable registries must
meet the following ICMJE requirements:
be publicly available, searchable, and open to all
prospective registrants
have a validation mechanism for registration data
be managed by a not-for-profit organization
The trial registry number for eligible papers will be
collected during the submission process.
Toolkits
Springer Nature endorses the toolkits and guidelines
produced by the following bodies:
Committee on Publication Ethics
Good Publication Practice
Medical Publishing Insights and Practices Initiative
Competing Interests
In the interests of transparency and to help readers form
their own judgments of potential bias, authors must
declare whether or not there are any competing interests
in relation to the work described. This information must
be included in their cover letter and after the
acknowledgements of their manuscript. In cases where
the authors declare a competing interest, a statement to
that effect is published as part of the article. If no such
conflict exists, the statement will simply read that the
authors have nothing to disclose.
For the purposes of this statement, competing interests
are defined as those of a financial nature that, through
their potential influence on behaviour or content, or
from perception of such potential influences, could
undermine the objectivity, integrity or perceived value
of a publication. They can include any of the following:
Funding: Research support (including salaries,
equipment, supplies, reimbursement for attending
symposia, and other expenses) by organizations
that may gain or lose financially through this
publication. The role of the funding body in the
design of the study, collection and analysis of data
and decision to publish should be stated.
Employment: Recent (while engaged in the
research project), present or anticipated
employment by any organization that may gain or
lose financially through this publication.
10
Revised October 31
st
, 2023 www.nature.com/lsa
Personal financial interests: Stocks or shares in
companies that may gain or lose financially
through publication; consultation fees or other
forms of remuneration from organizations that
may gain or lose financially; patents or patent
applications whose value may be affected by
publication.
It is difficult to specify a threshold at which a financial
interest becomes significant, but note that many US
universities require faculty members to disclose interests
exceeding $10,000 or 5% equity in a company. Any such
figure is arbitrary, so we offer as one possible practical
alternative guideline: "Declare all interests that could
embarrass you were they to become publicly known
after your work was published." We do not consider
diversified mutual funds or investment trusts to
constitute a competing financial interest.
The statement must contain an explicit and
unambiguous statement describing any potential conflict
of interest, or lack thereof, for any of the authors as it
relates to the subject of the report. Examples include “Dr.
Smith receives compensation as a consultant for XYZ
Company,” “Dr. Jones and Dr. Smith have financial
holdings in ABC Company,” or “Dr. Jones owns a patent
on the diagnostic device described in this report.” These
statements acknowledging or denying conflicts of
interest must be included in the manuscript under the
heading Conflict of Interest. The Conflict of Interest
disclosure appears in the cover letter, in the manuscript
submission process and before the References section in
the manuscript.
Following the Competing Interests heading, there must
be a listing for each author, detailing the professional
services relevant to the submission. Neither the precise
amount received from each entity nor the aggregate
income from these sources needs to be provided.
Professional services include any activities for which the
individual is, has been, or will be compensated with
cash, royalties, fees, stock or stock options in exchange
for work performed, advice or counsel provided, or for
other services related to the author’s professional
knowledge and skills. This would include, but not
necessarily be limited to, the identification of
organizations from which the author received contracts
or in which he or she holds an equity stake if
professional services were provided in conjunction with
the transaction.
Examples of declarations are:
Conflict of Interest.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Conflict of Interest.
Dr Caron's work has been funded by the NIH. He
has received compensation as a member of the
scientific advisory board of Acadia
Pharmaceutical and owns stock in the company.
He also has consulted for Lundbeck and received
compensation. Dr Rothman and Dr Jensen declare
no potential conflict of interest.
Pre- and Post-Submissions
Authors are welcome to post pre-submission versions or
the original submitted version of the manuscript on a
personal blog, a collaborative wiki or a recognized
preprint server (such as arXiv and bioRxiv) at any time.
For content published under a Creative Commons
license, authors can replace the submitted version with
the final published version at publication as long as a
publication reference and URL to the published version
on the journal website are provided.
Post Acceptance
Once a manuscript is accepted, the paper will be sent for
typesetting. In approximately 7-10 business days, the
corresponding author will receive a link to our online
portal to complete the Article Processing Charge (APC)
payment form. Then the corresponding author will
receive an email with a link to complete the necessary
open access Licence to Publish agreement on behalf of all
authors. Government employees from the United States
and UK are required to complete relevant government
open access license to publish forms which are available
via the portal.
Please note that the proofs will not be sent until these
forms be completed. In order to avoid any delay in the
publication of your work, we suggest that the
corresponding author “whitelist” emails from the
@springernature.com exchange to ensure that these
messages are received and that we be notified at
acceptance if the corresponding author will be traveling
or otherwise unavailable to take action in a timely
manner.
Policy about conference submissions
If a submission is only presented in the conference
abstracts and talks, Light: Science & Applications (LSA) is
11
Revised October 31
st
, 2023 www.nature.com/lsa
happy to consider it. But if a submission contains major
results and materials that have been published in a
conference proceedings, then in principle, LSA would
not consider it for review. However, if the published
results only constitute very small part of the paper,
please send a pre-inquiry letter (including the drafted
manuscript, details of the conference proceeding paper,
permission to re-use previously published material and
proper citation) to [email protected]c.cn. The LSA
Editorial Office will decide whether the submission is
qualified.
Electronic manipulation of images
Digital image enhancement is acceptable practice,
although it can result in the presentation of
unrepresentative data as well as in the loss of
meaningful signals. During manipulation of images a
positive relationship between the original data and the
resulting electronic image must be maintained. If a
figure has been subjected to significant electronic
manipulation, the specific nature of the enhancements
must be noted in the figure legend or in the 'Materials
and methods' section. The editors reserve the right to
request original versions of figures from the authors of a
paper under consideration.
Supplementary information for editors
and reviewers
Any manuscripts under review or accepted for
publication elsewhere should accompany the submission
if they are relevant to its scientific assessment.
Authors should also provide upon submission any kind
of supplementary material that will aid the review
process.
Peer Review
The journal operates single blind peer review.
Manuscripts sent out for peer review are evaluated by at
least one independent reviewer (often two or more).
Authors are welcome to suggest independent reviewers
to evaluate their manuscript, as well as request
individuals or laboratories. All recommendations are
considered, but the choice of reviewers is at the editors’
discretion. To expedite the review process, only papers
that seem most likely to meet editorial criteria are sent
for external review. Papers judged by the editors to be of
insufficient general interest or otherwise inappropriate
are rejected promptly without external review. The
editors then make a decision based on the reviewers'
evaluations:
Accept, with or without editorial revisions.
Revise, with the author addressing concerns
raised by the reviewers before a final decision is
reached.
Reject outright, typically on grounds of specialist
interest, lack of novelty, insufficient conceptual advance
or major technical and/or interpretational problems.
Appeals
Please note that all Light: Science & Applications (LSA)
manuscripts must go through rigorous peer-review and
balanced comments by editor and editor-in-chief. In
most cases, general appeal will not be accepted.
However, there might be rare cases where reviewers
may overlook or misunderstand the key point in the
manuscript, makes substantial errors of fact or there is
significant evidence of conflict, in which case further
consideration may be merited, but only if a reversal of
that reviewer's opinion would have changed the original
decision. In this case, an appeal may be raised.
Please note following points when presenting an appeal:
Only one appeal is permitted for each manuscript;
Appeal should be sent to light_lsa@ciomp.ac.cn
within a month after the final decision;
Manuscripts cannot be submitted elsewhere while
an appeal is being considered;
Appeals are granted only to rectify errors and
should not be considered a second submission
chance.
Please provide the following information with the
appeal letter:
Reason for appeal;
A statement of the innovation and impact of the
manuscript;
A point-by-point response to the referees’
comments (please be sure that all the referees’
technical comments have been satisfactorily
addressed (not just some of them)).
Appeal results:
Appeal accepted: The revised manuscript is
treated as a new manuscript;
Appeal rejected: No further consideration for this
manuscript.
Correction and retraction policy
We recognize our responsibility to correct errors.
Content published online is final and cannot be
amended. The online version is part of the published
12
Revised October 31
st
, 2023 www.nature.com/lsa
record; therefore the original version must be preserved
and changes to the paper should be made as a formal
correction. If an error is noticed after online publication
an HTML (or full-text) version of the correction will be
created and linked to the original article. Please note the
following policy for making corrections to online peer-
reviewed content:
Publisher Correction. Notification of an important
error made by the journal that affects the
publication record or the scientific integrity of the
paper, or the reputation of the authors, or of the
journal.
Author Correction. Notification of an important
error made by the author(s) that affects the
publication record or the scientific integrity of the
paper, or the reputation of the authors or the
journal.
Retraction. Notification of invalid results. All co-
authors must sign a retraction specifying the error
and stating briefly how the conclusions are
affected.
Decisions about corrections are made by the Editor
(sometimes with advice of peer reviewers) and this
sometimes involves author consultation. Requests to
make corrections that do not affect the paper in a
significant way or impair the reader's understanding of
the contribution (a spelling mistake or grammatical
error, for example) are not considered. In cases where co-
authors disagree about a correction, the Editor will take
advice from independent peer reviewers and impose the
appropriate correction, noting the dissenting author(s) in
the text of the published version.
FURTHER INFORMATION
For inquiries related to submission requirements, please contact the Editorial Office. For inquiries related to advertising,
subscriptions, permissions, papers in production or publishing a supplement, please contact the Publisher’s Office.