POLICY: 5030
Page 6
ASSESSMENT AND GRADING
and remediation may be required prior to reassessment. The teacher should provide
the opportunity for reassessment within two weeks’ time, whenever possible, and give
clear communication on when those opportunities are reasonably available (i.e., time,
dates, and location). The student should make the effort to coordinate with the teacher
to schedule any reassessment. The student will be given the higher grade between the
original assessment and the reassessment up to an 80%. Teachers, in consultation with
the student support teams and parents, will provide students who demonstrate a pattern
of repeated reassessments with an appropriate intervention, including limiting future
opportunities for reassessment.
2. Late Work. It is important that teachers accept late work to document
learning. Reasonable and consistent guidelines for accepting late work must be set and
communicated to students. Deadlines may be required for submitting late work.
a. If a student has made a reasonable effort to complete an
assessment, a grade of no lower than 50% will be assigned in order
to provide the student an opportunity to recover from the grade. It
is important that students feel there is an opportunity for success if
they work hard.
b. Teachers, in consultation with student support teams and parents,
will provide students who demonstrate a pattern of repeated late or
missing work with an appropriate intervention, including assigning a
grade less than 50%.
F. Assessment/Grading and Quarter Grades. An assessment and grading system
must be designed to motivate students and promote a growth mindset. Students who
receive a grade below 50% often feel they have no chance of recovery and give up on
achieving success in a course. For this reason, LCPS supports a floor of 50% when
assessing student achievement in quarter and final grades. In high school courses, the
floor of 50% does not apply to the final quarter of a course.
1. Teachers, in consultation with student support teams and parents, will
provide students who demonstrate a pattern of disengagement or a lack of participation
in the learning process with an appropriate intervention, including assigning a quarter or
final grade less than 50%.
2. Summative assessments may be administered in courses to evaluate
student learning, skill attainment, and achievement at the conclusion of a defined
instructional period; typically, at the end of a unit, course, semester, program, or school
year.
a. Standardized Summative Assessments. To enhance fair grading
practices for students, standardization of major summative
assessments is critical within a school. Grade level and subject