UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
RALEIGH DIVISION
IN RE: CASE NO. 14-00073-5-SWH
OLLIE WILLIAM FAISON
CHAPTER 11
DEBTOR
ORDER REGARDING REPORT OF PUBLIC SALE
This matter comes before the court upon the Report of Public Sale and Request for Hearing
[Wake County Property] (“Report”) filed by Ollie William Faison (“Debtor”) on August 21, 2018.
The court conducted a hearing on September 4, 2018 in Raleigh, North Carolina. John A. Northen,
Esq. appeared for the Debtor, William P. Janvier, Esq. appeared for Marlowe & Moye, LLC
(“Marlowe & Moye”), and the United States Bankruptcy Administrator Marjorie K. Lynch, Esq.
(“BA”) appeared on her own behalf. Based upon the evidence presented and arguments of counsel,
the court finds as follows:
SIGNED this 21 day of September, 2018.
______________________________________________________________________
SO ORDERED.
____________________________________
David M. Warren
United States Bankruptcy Judge
Case 14-00073-5-SWH Doc 593 Filed 09/21/18 Entered 09/21/18 15:21:47 Page 1 of 7
2
BACKGROUND
The Debtor filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code
1
on January 3, 2014 and is operating pursuant to his Fifth Amended Plan of
Reorganization (“Plan”), confirmed by the court on November 15, 2016.
At the time of his petition, the Debtor and his two siblings owned as tenants-in-common
approximately 120.63 acres of unencumbered real property located in Wake County, North
Carolina. Pursuant to an Order Authorizing Partition of Real Property entered on February 5,
2016, the Debtor and his siblings partitioned their ownership of this property, resulting in the
Debtor obtaining in fee simple approximately 40.35 acres known as the Woodfield tract and
defined in the Plan as the “Wake County Property.”
The Plan provides for designated payments to the Class 5 Allowed Unsecured Claims to
be secured by a first lien deed of trust upon the Wake County Property and requires the Debtor to
list with a broker and sell the Wake County Property as soon as reasonably possible. The Debtor
was unsuccessful in procuring a contract for the private sale of the Wake County Property and
decided instead to offer the Wake County Property for sale at public auction, a process which is
neither contemplated nor prohibited in the Plan.
On June 25, 2018, upon motion of the Debtor, the court entered an Order Authorizing
Debtor to Employ Iron Horse Auction Co., Inc. which allowed the Debtor to employ Iron Horse
Auction Company, Inc. (“Iron Horse”) pursuant to § 327(a) to market and sell the Wake County
Property at public sale, with Iron Horse being allowed a six percent (6%) commission plus an
advanced payment of $3,800.00 for the costs of advertising the sale. Upon additional motion of
the Debtor, on July 12, 2018, the court entered an Order Granting Motion to Authorize Public Sale
1
Except for formal citations, references to the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 101 et seq., will be by section
number only.
Case 14-00073-5-SWH Doc 593 Filed 09/21/18 Entered 09/21/18 15:21:47 Page 2 of 7
3
(“Sale Order”) which authorized Iron Horse to auction the Wake County Property pursuant to
§ 363. The Sale Order states that Wake County Property would be offered as a single parcel and
alternatively in three or four separate tracts, with Iron Horse selling in the configuration that would
generate the highest gross sale price.
Iron Horse conducted a public auction on August 15, 2018, and Marlowe & Moye was the
highest bidder for the Wake County Property as a single parcel for $577,000.00. This amount is
significantly higher than the aggregate amount of $139,000.00 for the highest bids for the Wake
County Property as separate parcels. Timothy A. Griffin was the second highest bidder for the
Wake County Property as a single parcel for $571,000.00. In the Report, the Debtor discloses that
his counsel was informed by Iron Horse that Marlowe & Moye may have colluded with or
attempted to collude with Mr. Griffin and may have paid or attempted to pay money to Mr. Griffin
to cease competitive bidding.
The Debtor testified that he first began marketing the Wake County Property in 2014 prior
to his bankruptcy filing and continued the marketing as part of his Chapter 11 reorganization. In
2016, he received a conditional offer from Marlowe & Moye to purchase the Wake County
Property for $1,110,000.00, a price which was comparable with appraisals of the property around
that time; however, the Town of Knightdale impeded development prospects by putting a limited
access road through the Wake County Property. Marlowe & Moye was unable to procure a change
of this access with the Town of Knightdale and properly withdrew its offer. Two other developers
expressed similar interest in the Wake County Property but declined to make offers due to the
limited access road. Based upon the inability to sell the Wake County Property privately after
marketing it for approximately four years, the Debtor resorted to public auction and believes that
anything higher than $570,000.00 is a fair price for the Wake County Property.
Case 14-00073-5-SWH Doc 593 Filed 09/21/18 Entered 09/21/18 15:21:47 Page 3 of 7
4
Iron Horse representatives Thomas McInnis, Chris Crawford, and Hobart Frye were
present and worked at the auction of the Wake County Property. At the hearing each testified
about the auction process and their observations surrounding the perceived collusion between the
principals of Marlowe & Moye and Mr. Griffin. Stewart Marlowe was present for the entire
auction and bid on behalf of Marlowe & Moye. Howard Moye appeared for some period and may
have also bid on behalf of Marlowe & Moye. The testimony was inconclusive on Mr. Moye’s
participation in the auction.
Iron Horse accepted bids through the Internet and at the auction site. The auction required
a lapse of ten minutes after each bid to allow for subsequent bidding, and if no bid was received
within this “quiet period,” then the Wake County Property would be sold to the highest bidder. If
a bidder placed a bid during the “quiet period,” then the ten-minute “quiet period” would start over
until no further bids were made during the final ten-minute “quiet period.”
During one of these “quiet periods,” Mr. Marlowe inquired of Mr. McInnis about the
identity of Mr. Griffin. Mr. McInnis cautioned Mr. Marlowe about communicating with other
bidders while the auction was pending. Both Mr. Marlowe and Mr. Griffin left the auction room
together. It is not clear when Mr. Griffin and Mr. Marlowe returned, but at some point, Mr. Griffin
left the premises for a personal errand but continued bidding by telephone. Later, after Mr. Griffin
returned, Mr. Crawford observed Mr. Marlowe and Mr. Griffin exchanging documents and
perhaps a check. Thereafter, Mr. Griffin ceased bidding, and Marlowe & Moye was designated
the highest bidder. Mr. Frye testified that although it was Iron Horse’s custom to audio-record or
video-record its auctions, sometimes the equipment will not work at a particular site but failed to
elaborate on the inoperability of the recording equipment. Mr. Frye was unaware of any recording
Case 14-00073-5-SWH Doc 593 Filed 09/21/18 Entered 09/21/18 15:21:47 Page 4 of 7
5
of the auction of the Wake County Property. Mr. McInnis and Mr. Crawford never addressed
whether a recording exists.
DISCUSSION
The Debtor disclosed the actions of the bidders to the court as a measure of caution and
good faith, relying on Iron Horse’s perceptions. This court demands and expects integrity in its
auctions. The allegations made by Iron Horse are alarming, but without more substantiation, the
court cannot and will not pursue assumptions.
Surprisingly, neither the Debtor nor the BA issued subpoenas for Mr. Griffin, Mr.
Marlowe, and Mr. Moye to appear and testify. Having them examined by the parties would have
been the best method to determine if any bid collusion had occurred. Even an investigation through
a non-judicial inquiry would have been helpful. Instead, Iron Horse’s assumptions of collusion
and impropriety were pure conjecture and speculation. The BA urged the court to deny
confirmation of the public sale pursuant to § 363(n) which allows avoidance of a sale under § 363
if the sale price was controlled by an agreement among potential bidders at such sale. If that is the
BA’s position, then she should have provided evidence.
At the conclusion of the hearing, the court announced that it could not find bid collusion
based upon the speculative evidence presented, especially given the amount of the purchase price.
The court opined further that the way Iron Horse conducted the auction contributed to an
environment for bid collusion. The court stated that it would consequently reduce Iron Horse’s
commission to three percent (3%). Since the hearing, the court has decided not to reduce the
compensation to Iron Horse, because even though it conducted a flawed auction, it acted
responsibly in reporting the matter to the court. The court will use this Order to instruct those
auctioneers, who should know better, on a proper auction to be conducted under the authority of
Case 14-00073-5-SWH Doc 593 Filed 09/21/18 Entered 09/21/18 15:21:47 Page 5 of 7
6
this court. The court specifically condemns the following: using “quiet periods” which welcome
and entice bid collusion; allowing bidders to leave not only the auction room but the auction
premises; accepting telephone bids; and failing to record the auction proceedings.
An auction should move quickly and be a series of competing bids. If bids cease, then the
hammer should fall after a final notice. Taking a break or allowing for a “quiet period” interrupts
the flow of the process and allows those present, unless properly monitored, to engage in
unacceptable public auction behavior.
Bidders should never be allowed to leave the immediate auction area. In this day of cell
phones, live streaming, email, and text communication, no one should ever have to leave an auction
room to get instructions from a client or from a superior. The revolving door in this auction venue
was a petri dish for bidders wishing to engage in questionable auction behavior.
Telephone bids should be used sparingly. The communication between the auctioneer who
is on the telephone with a bidder, to the exclusion of those attending the auction in person, creates
an appearance of impropriety. Using the Internet is acceptable if the auction is solely an Internet
auction, or as in this case, an Internet auction followed by a live auction. Still, auctioneers must
be careful with using an Internet auction. All bidders must be visible to each other with ultimate
transparency.
Finally, always record the sale. Even the most amateur auctioneer, including a foreclosure
trustee under a power of sale, generally records a sale with active bidders. Of all the mistakes Iron
Horse made, this fundamental error is the most incredulous. The court can find no excuse for
failing to record the sale. If Iron Horse wants to be employed as a professional in this court, it
needs to repair the existing recording equipment or purchase a new system. Even if the equipment
failed the day of the sale, Iron Horse surely had a contingency plan. Most cell phones have audio-
Case 14-00073-5-SWH Doc 593 Filed 09/21/18 Entered 09/21/18 15:21:47 Page 6 of 7
7
recording and video-recording capability, and between Messrs. McInnis, Crawford and Frye, odds
are very high that one of them had that cell phone technology, or at least they should have.
The parties, including Iron Horse and the Debtor, in particular, believe that Marlowe &
Moye’s high bid of $577,000.00 is a fair price for the Wake County Property. The Debtor would
be the most vocal critic if he believed collusion existed to depress the sale price. Not only does
the Debtor not object, he supports the sale and wants it to close as soon as possible. He is relying
on the proceeds to fund a payment of $300,000.00 due under the Plan to the Class 5 unsecured
creditors on December 1, 2018. Marlowe & Moye is ready, willing and able to close its purchase
of the Wake County Property, and that closing should occur; now therefore,
It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:
1. The BA’s request to avoid the public auction sale of the Wake County Property be,
and hereby is, denied;
2. The Debtor and Marlowe & Moye may proceed with closing the sale of the Wake
County Property pursuant to the Sale Order; and
3. Iron Horse may receive its commission in the amount of six percent (6%) of the
sale price.
END OF DOCUMENT
Case 14-00073-5-SWH Doc 593 Filed 09/21/18 Entered 09/21/18 15:21:47 Page 7 of 7
