APPOINTMENT AND PROMOTION
Librarian Series
d. All members of the librarian series will be informed in writing, on a yearly basis, of their
eligibility for review. A member of the librarian series who is not typically eligible for a review
during a particular review cycle may request an off-cycle review during that cycle.
e. Formal consideration of appointments, merit increases, promotions, and career status actions are
typically initiated by the department or unit head herein called the review initiator. Early in the
course of an academic review, the review initiator shall notify the candidate of the impending
review and in one or more conferences with the candidate make certain that the candidate is
adequately informed about the entire review process, including the criteria mentioned in APM -
360-10 and described in APM - 210-4.
The candidate shall be given the opportunity to ask
questions and to supply pertinent information and evidence to be used in the review. In
accordance with established campus policy applicable to the personnel action under
consideration, the review initiator shall solicit letters evaluating the candidate from qualified
persons, including a reasonable number of persons whose names have been provided by the
candidate. All such letters used in the review, even if unsolicited, shall be included in the file.
When soliciting letters of evaluation or following the receipt of an unsolicited letter, the review
initiator should include, attach, or send a statement regarding confidentiality of such letters.
f. The candidate may provide in writing to the review initiator or other appropriate person, as
provided in campus procedures, names of persons who in the view of the candidate, for reasons
set forth, might not objectively evaluate in a letter or on a committee, the candidate’s
qualifications or performance. Any such statement provided by the candidate shall be included in
the academic review record.
g. An academic review record shall be prepared for each candidate who is being considered for a
merit increase, promotion, or career status action. The review initiator is responsible for preparing
the candidate’s review record, which consists of the review initiator’s letter of recommendation
together with necessary additional letters and documents, including those letters solicited from
individuals selected from a list provided by the candidate. The review initiator’s letter, without
disclosing the identities of sources of confidential documents shall discuss the proposed personnel
action in light of the criteria cited in APM - 360-10 and described in APM - 210-4
and shall be
substantiated by supporting evidence.
Before forwarding the academic review record to the University Librarian or other administrative
officer with comparable responsibility, the review initiator shall provide the candidate the
opportunity to inspect all documents to be included in the review record other than confidential
academic review records. (Only those documents specified in APM - 160-20-b(1)(a) and (c)
are
defined as confidential academic review records for members of the librarian series.) The review
initiator shall provide a copy of the letter of recommendation to the candidate. In addition,
campus procedures may provide that any statements added to the review file by those acting in a
supervisory capacity above this initiating level shall be made available to the candidate upon
request.
The candidate shall be allowed a reasonable period of time, no less than seven consecutive
calendar days, to review and respond to the file. This period of time may be extended by mutual