Texas Education Today 8
Processes
National group to review Texas charter schools
As numerous charter school-related bills swirl about
in the closing days of the 83rd Texas Legislature,
a national expert discussed the positive aspects of
the current process for awarding open-enrollment
charter schools with the State Board of Education.
William Haft, vice president for Authorizer
Development of the National Association of Charter
School Authorizers (NACSA), spoke to the members
of the board’s Committee on School Initiatives.
The committee oversees the process for and
recommends applicants to the SBOE for awarding of
the charter.
Haft will also be conducting a review for the Texas
Education Agency of the current charter processes
for authorization, monitoring, renewing and closure
of under-performing charter schools.
That review is scheduled to get under way in early
summer.
Heather Mauzé, director of the division of charter
school administration at the Texas Education
Agency, said Haft and the NACSA offered to provide
the review to help the agency and the board
improve on an already strong process.
“He was very positive about our current practices,”
Mauzé said. “Mr. Haft complimented the state’s
strong four-part process for granting charters.
However, there is always room for improvement and
it’s always a good practice to review your system
and strive for excellence.”
Overall Haft had praise for the current authorization
system. He pointed out that the strengths include:
• the completeness check to be sure that the
charter applications contain all necessary
documents and background information.
• the selection of external reviewers through
a Request for Qualications (RFQ) process;
• a substantive internal review process by
Texas Education Agency staff;
• comprehensive individual reviews of the
applications; and,
• interviews by the committee of the nalists.
He pointed out that the application process requires
specic evidence in key areas such as community
support and evidence of strong leadership for
applicants.
Applicants are also required to show nancial
capacity and a strong innovative educational plan
for the students of the proposed school.
Haft said the board could improve in some areas
such as focusing more on the substantive part of
the application versus the technical compliance.
He also suggested aligning those substantive
requirements with the training for the external
reviewers, the rating system and the interview
process.
Under the current system, the board authorizes
the creation of charters, while the commissioner of
education oversees charter amendments, renewals
and revocations.
When asked how the Texas system of authorizing
charters compares with other states, Haft said the
only two states that were comparable in size and
scope were California and Arizona.
In California though, Haft explained, school districts
are counted as charter authorizers as well as the
state education board. In all, California has over
100 different charter school authorizers.
Arizona, he said, was structured very similar to
Texas with one authorizing board.
Haft told the board that he would start his
evaluation of the Texas charter school system
in June or July beginning with a desk audit and
request for information and data. From there, he
would go on to interview staff, stakeholders and
board members.
The review will also include a focus group survey of
the personnel at the charter schools.
Haft’s nal report will provide the agency and the
board with a overview of the best practices and
strengths of the Texas charter school system, along
with recommendations for improvement.