CONTEXT FOR
ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN
COLOMBIA
World Development Indicators database 2014, World Bank.
Workforce data is from the Economic Census of 2005, and export data for
2003, the latest available in Colombia.
“Comportamiento del Mercado Laboral por Sexo, Trimestre Abril-Junio de
2014, Boletin de prensa, Departamento Administrativo Nacional de
Estadística/DANE.
Informal MSMEs are constrained by lack of management capacity and access
to formal sources of financing and other governmental support mechanisms.
Colombia is an upper-middle income country of
48.3 million inhabitants with gross domestic
product (GDP) per capita of USD 11,890. It is
classified by the World Economic Forum as an
efficiency-driven economy. MSMEs are an
important segment of the economy, accounting
for 40% of GDP, over 80% of the workforce, and
13% of exports (OECD, 2014 ).
However, by OECD standards, Colombia has an
extremely high level of income inequality and
relative poverty (Joumard and Londoño Vélez,
2013). The unemployment rate in July 2014 was
9%, but higher for women than men (11.6% versus
7%). In fact, women accounted for 55% of the
unemployed, although they make up 43.2% of the
active labour force. A very large share of the
economy is informal, comprising 50-70% of
employment (Joumard and Londoño Vélez, 2013).
3
The MSME sector in Colombia exhibits a low level
of productivity and competitiveness. According to
the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Tourism
(MinCIT, 2009), there are several contributing
factors:business informality ; the high costs and
time required to deal with the red tape for doing
business; difficult access to financing; limitations
on market access; little access to new technology;
lower protection of property rights; low levels of
innovation; underdevelopment of entrepreneurial
skills; reluctance to share ownership of the
company; and limited interagency coordination.
The National Development Plan 2011-2014
recognises the importance of MSMEs and
entrepreneurship to the country’s
socio-economic development and stipulates
policies and actions to create “a competitive
environment that transforms ideas into
businesses, the businesses into jobs, jobs into
higher income, and, thus, less poverty and greater
wellness and social progress” and to support the
development of high value-added and innovative
products and services that can compete in
international markets (DNP, 2011).
The mandate for entrepreneurship and MSME
development rests with the Ministry of Trade,
Industry and Tourism (MinCIT) and is governed by
Law 590/2000 on promoting development of
MSMEs, amended by Law 905/2004, and Law
1014/2006 on promoting a culture of
entrepreneurship. The existence of these laws
indicates the level of importance placed by the
government on creating the conditions conducive
to MSME and entrepreneurship development and
addressing obstacles to enterprise creation and
growth. The National System for the Support and
Promotion of MSMEs, created in 2004, is
responsible for articulating public policy toward
MSMEs. It is comprised of a range of public and
private actors, financial and non-financial entities,
and various programmes, laws and procedures,
and is assisted in the design and formulation of
MSME promotion policies through the Council of
Microfirms and the Council of Small and Medium
Firms. These laws and policies have been
complemented by a number of other laws and
regulations to develop seed capital funds, the
National System of Creation and Business
Incubation, INNpulsa and other regional and
national entities.
The MinCIT also implements the National
Entrepreneurship Policy (see MinCIT, 2009). This
policy framework focuses on three pillars: (1)
facilitating the formal initiation of businesses, (2)
promoting access to funding for entrepreneurs
and start-ups, and (3) promoting interagency
coordination for the promotion of
entrepreneurship. The policy also seeks to
COLOMBIAN ENTREPRENEURIAL POLICY BRIEF