© 2013 | Emerging Professional’s Companion
3A
Bidding & Contract
Negotiation
activities - core*
introduction
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
338
339
340
341
338
324
Learning from AIA Bidding Documents
Completion of Bid Forms for a Project
Attendance at a Pre-Bid Meeting
Attendance at a Public Bid Opening
*A maximum of 40 hours of core credit may be earned in this experience area.
narrative 325
activities - elective 342
Project Delivery Approaches
Design Without Compromise & the Bid Package
Rebar Construction Revokes its Bid
Bids for an Elementary School
Alternates & the Over-Budget Project
Bidding Procedures – Public vs. Private
Pulling the Plug on the Electrical Sub
Bidding Error on the Up and Up?
The Late Bid
exhibits 351
351
352
Exhibit 3A-1
Exhibit 3A-2
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
324
resources
3A
Emerging Professional’s Companion | www.epcompanion.org
Download the current Intern
Development Program (IDP)
guidelines at www.ncarb.
org/Experience-Through-
Internships.aspx.
The American Institute of
Architects. Demkin, Joseph A.,
ed. The Architect’s Handbook of
Professional Practice. 14th ed.
Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons,
2008.
• Part 4 - Contracts and
Agreements
The American Institute of
Architects. Demkin, Joseph A.,
ed. The Architect’s Handbook of
Professional Practice. 13th ed.
New York: John Wiley & Sons,
2001.
• Chapter 11 - Contracts
and Agreements
The American Institute of
Architects, The Architecture
Student’s Handbook of
Professional Practice. 14th ed.
Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons,
2009.
• Part 4 - Contracts and
Agreements
Introduction
By completing the activities in this chapter, you will gain an understanding
oftheeldactivitiesinvolvedinbiddingandcontractnegotiation.
The following information is taken from the NCARB IDP Guidelines:
Bidding and Contract Negotiation
Minimum Bidding and Contract Negotiation Experience: 120 Hours
Denition:Involvestheestablishmentandadministrationofthebidding
process, issuance of addenda, evaluation of proposed substitutions, review
ofbidderqualications,analysisofbids,andselectionofthecontractor(s).
Tasks
At the completion of your internship, you should be able to:
• Conduct or participate in bidding/negotiating phase
• Evaluate product and material substitutions
• Prepare bid documents including addenda
Knowledge Of/Skill In
• Conictresolution
• Construction procurement (e.g., bidding, negotiating)
• Contracts (e.g., professional services and construction)
• Interpreting construction documents
• Oral and written communications
• Product and material substitutions
• Project delivery methods
notes
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
325
3A
www.epcompanion.org | Emerging Professional’s Companion
Take brief notes while reading the narrative and list key resources you used to complete the activities. Note
discussion outcomes from meetings with your supervisor, mentor, or consultants. When nalizing the activity
documentation (PDF), include your notes and the Emerging Professional’s Companion activity description.
Narrative
The architect’s duties in contractor selection may appear relatively minor in comparison to the architect’s
role in design and construction. However, the architect’s role in contractor selection is pivotal in terms
of establishing sound working relationships, limiting liability to the owner and the architect, and treating
contractors fairly.
An increasingly complex design and construction environment necessitates consideration of modes of
project delivery that differ from the traditional design-bid-build approach. Certainly, the recent advances
in integrated project delivery provide powerful new alternatives to the traditional construction process.
No matter what project delivery approach is used, however, contractor selection criteria and procedures
should be clear, sound, and strictly adhered to, particularly in publicly bid work. In addition, the owner
needs to be informed of the implications of straying from the rules. Attention to detail and the importance of
communication should enable a smooth transition from design to the construction phase, or merging of the
two project increments, and optimize the chances of achieving a successful project.
Bidding and contract negotiation are two distinct steps in traditional contractor selection. While these may
constitute only a small portion of an architect’s overall services, they are a critical bridge between design
and construction. Even the best design and most accurate and complete construction documentation cannot
ensure success. After all, someone needs to turn the ideas represented in the construction documents
into a three-dimensional physical reality. Ultimately, it is the quality of the contractor(s) and the quality of
the working relationships among the owner, contractor, architect, and their subcontractors and consultants
that will determine just how successful a project will be. Thus, the means used to select a contractor is a
critical issue that needs to be addressed as early as possible with the client. The selection process lays
the groundwork for the realization of the project and the relationships among the parties involved in the
construction process.
Traditionally, contractor selection has followed a design-bid-build strategy, which separates design and
construction into distinct increments and limits the choice of a contractor on the basis of lowest cost. Design-
bid-build works well for a wide variety of projects of all sizes and is still widely used in the construction
industry. In this project delivery method, the owner establishes one contract with the architect for design
services and another with a builder (or perhaps several separate contractors each with prime contracts
with the owner) for construction. The architect’s role during construction is limited to administration of the
construction contract between owner and builder. Having developed a set of contract documents that
establish a scope of construction work, the architect releases them to competing contractors who propose a
price for completing the work. In most cases, the job is awarded to the lowest responsible bidder.
The bulk of this chapter details how the bidding process works in the context of traditional design-bid-build.
Special attention is given to procedural issues and limiting liability. The remaining portion of the chapter
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
326
resources
3A
Emerging Professional’s Companion | www.epcompanion.org
The American Institute of
Architects. Demkin, Joseph A.,
ed. The Architect’s Handbook of
Professional Practice. 13th ed.
New York: John Wiley & Sons,
2001.
The American Institute of
Architects. Demkin, Joseph A.,
ed. The Architect’s Handbook of
Professional Practice. 14th ed.
Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons,
2008.
TheConstructionSpecications
Institute. The Project Resource
Manual: CSI Manual of Practice.
New York: McGraw-Hill, 2005.
AIA Contract Documents
are considered the industry
standard. Learn more at
www.aia.org/contractdocs.
In addition, samples of AIA
Contract Documents are
available for interns. View
the list of sample contract
documents and resources for
interns.
provides an overview of contractor selection in alternative approaches
to project delivery, including design-negotiation-build, design-build, and
construction management. In contemporary design and construction, such
approaches are often worth considering for economic, schedule, technical
complexity, and project coordination reasons and thus are increasingly
common. However, such project delivery methods have very different
implications for project coordination and liability, and for the architect’s
roles and responsibilities, than does the design-bid-build approach.
The following discussion of competitively bid contracts outlines many of the
issues generally associated with contractor selection and project delivery,
no matter what delivery method is employed. Following it is a detailed
description of bidding procedures, followed by a review of practical and
legal pitfalls in bidding and contract negotiation.
Preparation
Competitive bidding involves sending complete sets of contract documents
to two or more contractors who bid against each other. Usually, the lowest
bidder is awarded the contract. The initial tasks in a competitive bidding
process include: determining whether the pool of bidders should be open
or selective, qualifying contractors, and preparing and issuing the bid
package.
Choosing Open or Selective Bidding
The architect and the owner decide whether they will get better results
for a project by choosing from a large or a small pool of bidders. Their
decision determines whether the bidding process is open or selective.
When attracting a large number of bidders is considered desirable,
as is often the case in public sector work, open bidding is used. An
“advertisement to bid” is published in trade or government publications
or professional journals, inviting any interested contractors to participate.
When a limited number of bidders are preferred, a selective bidding
process is implemented. An “invitation to bid” is sent to a selected group of
contractors based on reputation, recommendation, prior work, or previous
relationship with the owner or the architect.
Qualifying Bidders
Prospectivebiddersareidentiedbasedontheirabilitytosuccessfully
undertake a project. In some cases, the contractors reputation or
relationshipwiththeownerissufcient,butsometimesitisnecessary
toestablishthequalicationsofcontractorsbeforebiddingdocuments
are issued. This is particularly important in the open bidding process, so
unsuitable bidders are eliminated and the administration effort involved in
competing a high number of bidders is reduced. AIA Document A305™,
ContractorsQualicationStatement,maybeusedinthepre-qualication
stage of the open bidding process to help the architect and the owner
assess a contractors suitability for the project. When completed, the
document provides full details of the contractors business record,
including business history, organization and scope of operations, past
record of construction work (type, range of experience, etc.), trade and
bank references, bonding company, and details of assets and liabilities.
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
327
3A
www.epcompanion.org | Emerging Professional’s Companion
Preparing the Bid Package
Tofacilitatecontractorselection,theownermaylloutAIADocumentG612™,OwnersInstructionstothe
Architect Regarding the Construction Contract. The information in this document is intended to provide
information to the architect that will clarify the owners requirements and preferences. Once bidders have
beenidentied,apackageofinformationconcerningtheproposedprojectisissued.Thepackageincludes
the following:
• Invitation or advertisement to bid
• Drawingsandspecications
• Bid form
• Notice to Bidders
• Instructions to Bidders
• Proposed contract documents
• Bid security details (if required)
Invitation or Advertisement to Bid
The original invitation or advertisement provides a concise summary of the project. The law usually requires
public work to be advertised in generally available publications. Private clients may choose to advertise in
trade publications or other venues, depending on the nature of the project.
Drawings and Specications
These documents should be as complete and unambiguous as possible to make it possible for the
contractor to bid accurately. They are sent free of charge to bidders. To ensure that unsuccessful bidders
return the bidding documents, a deposit is usually required; this is returned upon receipt of outstanding
documents. The number of sets for each bidder varies; two may be appropriate for smaller work, while larger
projects may require three or more. Projects that are more complex or under time constraints may require
extra sets. The architect can require additional payment for the extra work necessary to produce multiple
sets. Similarly, if any of the bidders ask for extra copies, these may be provided at the bidders expense.
Pre-Bid Conference
Depending on the nature of the project and client preferences, a conference for potential bidders may
be useful. Walter Rosenfeld, AIA, CSI, offers the following advice in the 13th edition of The Architect’s
Handbook of Professional Practice:
A pre-bid conference, held two or three weeks before bids are due, may be valuable for several reasons.
It focuses potential bidders on the project, allows the architect to reiterate key points in the documents,
and (if held at the site) gives bidders an opportunity to visit the site. An agenda might include the following
items:
• Project background
• Conrmationofbiddateandprocedures
• Further explanation of alternates
• Identicationofspecialissuesorworkingconditions
• Any update on the post-bid schedule
• Questions and observations about the project
For the owner and architect, such a meeting provides an indication of contractor interest in the project.
Itmaydisclosequestionsorissuesthatrequireclaricationoradditionalinformation,whichresultsinan
addendum to the bid documents. (Many architects report that they do not answer any such questions at
the pre-bid conference, both to provide time for a full answer and to be sure that all bidders receive the
sameanswer.)Onoccasionthepre-bidconferencemayuncoverasignicantgapinthedocumentsor
bidding procedure—a gap that is much easier to address during bidding than after all the proposals have
been received.
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
328
resources
3A
Emerging Professional’s Companion | www.epcompanion.org
Bidders Representations
According to AIA Document
A701™, Instructions to
Bidders, the act of making a bid
represents the following:
• The bidder has read and
understands the bidding
documents.
• The bid complies with the
bidding documents.
• The bidder has visited
the site and observed
the conditions under
which the work will be
performed.
• The bid is based, without
exception, on the
materials, equipment, and
systems called for in the
bidding documents.
In addition to familiarizing
themselves with the site
and requirements of the
project, bidders are to report
to the architect any errors,
inconsistencies, or ambiguities
they discover in the construction
documents.
View the list of sample contract
documents and resources for
interns.
Although contract documents should be complete and unambiguous,
it is not always possible to determine the full scope of a project without
designating certain alternatives to be decided by the owner at a later time.
Thisneedforexibilitycanbeaccommodatedintwoways:
Alternates. An alternate bid may be required or accepted for a
speciedsectionofthework,andthisshouldbeincludedinthe
calculation of the base bid. This procedure can help keep costs
within budget but should be used sparingly. It should not be
employed to give one bidder preference over the others.
Unit prices. Unit prices supply a price per unit for materials and/or
services. They offer the architect and owner a comparable means
of measurement to use in comparing bids. Unit prices also provide
an idea of price calculation for unknown quantities or variable
factors. Use of this approach should be limited if the overall budget
needs to be controlled.
Bid Form
This form is sent to all bidders and contains relevant information
concerning the project. Each bidder returns the document complete with
thepriceofthework,orbasebid,andanyotherguresthatmaybe
appropriate(e.g.,alternatebids,substitutionsforspeciedmaterialsor
services, etc.).
Notice to Bidders
This notice, which may be included in the bidding documents, informs
prospective bidders of their opportunity to bid and of the conditions and
requirements involved.
Instructions to Bidders
AIA Document A701™, Instructions to Bidders, provides relevant
information concerning the detailed requirements of the bidding process.
Included are the following items:
• Denitions
• Bidding documents
• Consideration of bids
• Owner-contractor agreement
• Supplementary instructions
• Bidder’s representations
• Bidding procedures
• Post-bid information
• Performance/labor and material payment bonds (see bid security
below)
Proposed contract documents
All documents intended for use in the proposed project should be sent to
each bidder for examination, including the general conditions (e.g., AIA
Document A201™, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction)
and any other applicable addendums or supplementary conditions. A new
edition of the contract was published in 2007 with changes to contractor
and client responsibilities, which should be checked carefully.
notes
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
329
3A
www.epcompanion.org | Emerging Professional’s Companion
Bid security
Inordertoensureeachbidderscommitmenttotheirbasebidandwillingnesstofullltheirobligationtosign
the contract if they are selected, the owner may require some form of security, which should be submitted
alongwiththereturnedbidform.Thesecuritymighttaketheformofcash,acertiedcheck,orabidbond
(AIA Document A310™, Bid Bond).
The bid security could be expressed either in a lump sum or as a percentage of the base bid. Bidders
usually prefer the former, as it does not reveal their bid before opening. This amount is usually not less than
tenpercentofthebidamount.Asuccessfulbidderthatrefusestoundertaketheworkforthebidspecied
may forfeit all or part of the security. The penalty amount is usually determined as the difference between
the selected bid and the next lowest bidder, although the penalty cannot exceed the amount of the security.
During Bidding
AIA Document A701™, Instructions to Bidders, sets forth some commonly used bidding procedures,
including the provision of information for use by contractors in preparing and submitting their bids. The
summarybelowreectsthesebiddingprocedures,althoughofcourseotherproceduresmaybeusedto
reectaproject’suniquerequirements.Afterthebiddingdocumentshavebeenmailed,itmaybenecessary
for the architect to modify the bidding documents before bids are due. Once bids have been submitted, a bid
openingisheldandthenalselectionofthecontractorismade.
Modication of Bidding Documents
The owner if necessary may request certain adjustments to the documents before the closing date for bid
submission. These are usually in the form of interpretations or substitutions.
Interpretations
If any bidders discover errors or ambiguities in the documentation, they must inform the architect in writing
at least seven days prior to the submission date. The architect issues any changes or addenda that result
from the inquiry to all bidders.
Substitutions
Shouldanyofthebidderswishtosubstitutematerialsorservicesotherwisespeciedinthebidding
documents, the architect must receive a request for approval in writing at least 10 days before the
submissiondate.Ifthearchitectdeterminesthesubstitutionisacceptable,allpartiesarenotiedby
addendum,althoughnoaddendumcanbemadewithinfourdaysofthenalreceiptdateexceptanotice
canceling or postponing the request for bids.
Submission of Bids
Bidsmustbereceivedinwriting,containedinsealed,opaqueenvelopespriortothetimeanddatespecied
intheadvertisement/invitationtobid.Oralbidsarenotacceptable,andanybidsreceivedafterthespecied
time should be returned unopened.
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
330
resources
3A
Emerging Professional’s Companion | www.epcompanion.org
Owner-Architect and Owner-
Contractor Agreements
For more information about
owner-architect and owner-
contractor agreements, consult
the following resources:
The American Institute of
Architects. Demkin, Joseph A.,
ed. The Architect’s Handbook of
Professional Practice. 14th ed.
Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons,
2008.
• Chapter16Typesof
Agreements
The American Institute of
Architects. Demkin, Joseph A.,
ed. The Architect’s Handbook of
Professional Practice. 13th ed.
New York: John Wiley & Sons,
2001.
• Chapter 11 Contracts and
Agreements
The American Institute of
Architects, The Architecture
Student’s Handbook of
Professional Practice. 14th ed.
Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons,
2009.
• Chapter 11 Types of
Agreements
Bid Opening
If the bids are opened in public they are often read aloud. When bids
are opened in private, the bidding information may be sent to all bidders
at the owners discretion. The owner need not accept any of the bids if
they appear too high and may reject any bid not in conformance with the
stated requirements. However, the bidding documents do provide that if a
contractor is chosen, it will be on the basis of the lowest responsible bid. A
decision is usually made within 10 days of the bid opening.
In publicly bid work, the owner is often constrained by law to accept the
lowest responsible bidder and thus may be held liable if the selection does
not conform to that requirement (i.e., the lowest monetary bid, coupled with
the owners satisfaction that the contractor can successfully undertake the
work). In privately bid work, the owners obligation to accept one of the
bidsisnotasclear,particularlywhenanownerhasspecicallyreserved
the right, in its sole discretion, to accept or reject bids. However, even
when there is no legal obligation to accept a certain bid, owners may
feel compelled from a business standpoint to select the lowest bidder to
prevent suspicion of favoritism and avoid ill feeling among contractors with
whom they may want to work in the future.
Contractor Selection
Prior to the bid opening, any bidders may withdraw or modify their bids.
However, once the bids have been opened, bidders cannot make changes
or withdraw from the process for a period stipulated in the bidding
documents (e.g., 30 days). Once selected, the successful bidder must
undertake the work for the agreed price or risk forfeiting the bid bond
(if any). Exceptions to this are sometimes made if a bidder can prove
substantial error in the bid calculation, in which case withdrawal might
be appropriate, with award of the contract to the next lowest bidder.
Alternatively, the contract may be re-bid. Defaulting bidders should be
disqualiedfromanyfurtherbiddingonthesameproject,andnobid
correction should be permitted, except for minor clerical errors and
alterations.
After Bidding
When a contractor has been selected (usually within 10 days of bid
opening), all bidding parties should be informed of the decision.
Unsuccessfulbiddersareoftengivenalistofthebidgures,andthebid
deposits are returned once the contract documents have been returned.
The successful bidder should be informed of the decision in a way that
does not form a legally binding agreement before the contract documents
are signed. Usually, the bids of the next two or three lowest bidders are
retainedforaspeciedperiodasacontingencymeasure.
At this stage, each party to the proposed building contract may provide
further information and/or assurances to the other parties. For example,
theownermay,uponrequest,demonstratetothecontractorthatsufcient
nancialarrangementshavebeenmadetoundertaketheproject.The
contractor, typically within seven days of the contract award, should furnish
names of proposed suppliers of materials and equipment, details of the
amount of work to be undertaken by the contractors forces, and a list of
notes
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
331
3A
www.epcompanion.org | Emerging Professional’s Companion
intendedsubcontractorsforthearchitect’sapproval.Thecontractormayalsobeaskedforaqualication
statement (if appropriate and not required prior to selection), evidence of the responsibility and reliability of
the work force, and bonds in accordance with the owners requirements as expressed in the instructions to
bidders.
When these and any other preliminary matters have been dealt with and the contracts prepared, the owner
and contractor are ready to enter into the contractual agreement.
After the Agreement
As soon as practical after the owner-contractor agreement has been signed, the contractor should submit
a list of proposed subcontractors and suppliers to the architect. Under the single contract system, it is not
unusual for prime contractors to sublet parts of the work to other contractors, either because of the size of a
project or to take advantage of special skills and expertise the subcontractors have to offer. The contractor
may select suitable subcontractors, and the owner typically cannot require a contractor to work with anyone
about whom the contractor raises reasonable objections.
The architect or the owner may lodge reasonable objections to any of the names on the contractors list of
subcontractors, but such objections should be made promptly so the contractor may submit a substitute.
If the substitution is acceptable, the contract sum can be adjusted by change order to accommodate
alterations in cost caused by the substitution. The contractor should not change any subcontractors for a
project without the knowledge and approval of the architect and the owner.
If AIA owner-contractor agreements are being used and subcontracting is expected, it may be advisable
to use a standard form of subcontractor agreement. AIA Document A401™, Contractor-Subcontractor
Agreement Form, can be used in conjunction with other AIA documents.
Subcontractors may, in turn, engage other contractors, termed sub-subcontractors to work on a project. The
relationship between these parties is similar to the relationship between the contractor and subcontractor,
although the prime contractor still has overall responsibility to the owner for the project.
Practical and Legal Safeguards
What practical and legal issues are associated with bidding? On the whole, comparatively few legal cases
provide guidance about an architect’s liability originating from errors in bidding. Despite this relative dearth
of legal authority, architects can take at least some steps to protect themselves from claims by clients,
contractors, or subcontractors and to protect the owners interests during the construction phase.
Quality Documentation
Court cases involving contractors’ claims based on misinterpretation or inadequate documentation highlight
some of the problems an architect may cause or otherwise encounter. Hazy documentation, for example,
may induce bidders to build substantial contingencies into their base bids. This could leave an architect
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
332
resources
3A
Emerging Professional’s Companion | www.epcompanion.org
As you research and look for
more information on topics
presented in the Emerging
Professional’s Companion,
remember that a quick internet
search of keywords can be
incredibly useful to completing
your Activities.
open to claims for inadequately estimating project construction costs.
Some courts have ruled against architects when bids exceeded estimates
byaslittleasfteenpercent,orevenless.Thisisworrisomeconsidering
that professional liability insurance often does not cover errors in cost
estimating.
When there is limited preparation time, or when owner requirements are
uncertain,clarityindocumentationmaybedifculttoachieve.However,
clear and carefully produced construction documentation allows for greater
precision in bidding and thus a more realistic construction cost.
Other aspects of bidding that can affect cost include requests for alternate
design bids and for unit pricing. Architects should exercise special care
whenever these optional bidding devices are under consideration.
Clear Rules
Courts have ruled on a number of occasions that owners do not act in
good faith when they make what may appear to be arbitrary selection
decisions. In one example, an owner decided to award a contract to the
second lowest bidder because it was a local corporation. A court ruled this
decision invalid because locale was not initially listed as a criterion.
To avoid this type of situation, your notice to bidders and instructions to
bidders should be stated very clearly. Be sure to mention every factor
you and the owner will use to select the winning bid. In addition, exactly
thesamedatashouldbesenttoallbidders,includinganyclarication
requested by one of the bidders prior to bid opening.
Strict Adherence to Procedures
Once the bid package has been released with its clear requirements, strict
adherence to selection procedures will also often help the owner and
architect avoid the appearance of unfairness or competitive advantage.
Any action that smacks of collusion between the owner or the architect and
one of the bidders invites suspicion and perhaps a lawsuit, especially in
publicly bid work.
The procedures for bidding laid out in AIA Document A701™ offer a series
of orderly steps and safeguards that protect the owner and, by implication,
thearchitectfromunqualiedcontractors.Atthesametime,theyprovide
bidderswithanevenplayingeld.Publicsectorprocurementprocedures
areoftensimilarlydesigned,andareusuallyquitespecictohelpensure
fair and open competition.
To demonstrate fairness, valid bids can be opened in public and late bids
returned unopened. The question of what constitutes a late bid has been
the focus of a number of court cases brought by disgruntled bidders who
felt a late bid gave a competitor an unfair edge. In one case involving
a federal project, acceptance of a bid 30 seconds after the time of bid
openingwasheldtobeinvalid.Whilesomeexibilitymaybeacceptable
in special circumstances—mail delivery problems, perhaps—the architect
should advise the owner of problems that may result from accepting late
bids.
notes
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
333
3A
www.epcompanion.org | Emerging Professional’s Companion
Cautious Rejection of Bidders
Some suits have been brought against design professionals who counseled against hiring particular
contractors. In one case, an engineers opinion rendered in good faith helped fend off a suit from a bidder
theengineerfeltlackedsufcientexperiencetodothework.However,courtshaveruledagainstanowner
whodecidedthelowestbidderwasinsufcientlyresponsiblebasedsolelyonrumorsofpoorperformance
orwhodidnotsolicitsufcientinformationonahithertounknowncontractor.Thesedecisionswerebased
on the concept that the owner exercised insubstantial reasoning in rejecting the contractor. Owners are
expected to consider a contractors recent performance to verify if earlier problems have been addressed.
An architect who chooses to advise an owner to reject a contractor with the lowest bid should do this
with great care, especially in publicly bid work. Architects’ advice on hiring will be most defensible if it is
basedonlyonobjective,factualconsiderationsandisfreeofanyconictofinterest.Whenanarchitect
recommends rejection, it is best to record in writing the data and reasoning that led to this decision. Avoid
sweeping personal statements and slander. Also make it a point not to record statements that, however
innocently intended, may come back to haunt you.
A similar approach should be adopted when an architect demands substitution of a subcontractor. It
is estimated that very few architects actually take advantage of their contractual ability to object to
subcontractors or suppliers proposed by a contractor. If this power is invoked, however, the rationale for
substitution should be clearly and objectively articulated to limit the possibility of a claim from a disgruntled
rejected subcontractor.
Contractor Selection and Alternate Delivery Methods
Design-bid-build is just one of many project delivery approaches used today. Following are brief descriptions
of the major alternatives:
Design-Negotiation-Build
An owner may choose to select a contractor on the basis of reputation, specialized expertise, or a past
working relationship. In this arrangement, the owner negotiates the terms of the agreement and payment for
the work, forgoing the advantage of having the project competitively bid.
Owners choose this delivery method when project requirements justify it, for example, when quality
rather than economy is a major determinant. In other circumstances, it may be advantageous to skip the
bidding process to get construction underway more quickly. Negotiation can also make it possible to bring
acontractoronboardbeforecontractdocumentsarecomplete,whichmayprovidebenetsintermsof
coordination and communication among the owner, architect, and builder. Usually, a cost plus fee contract,
in which the contractor is reimbursed for the cost of doing the work, with a separate fee for overhead and
prot,isusedforthisprojectdeliverymethod.
Design-Build
The design-build approach, where the owner contracts with a design-builder to provide both the design
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
334
resources
3A
Emerging Professional’s Companion | www.epcompanion.org
Abramowitz, Ava J. Architect’s
Essentials of Contract
Negotiation. New York: John
Wiley & Sons, 2002.
and construction of the project, is becoming more popular. Architects
and contractors may join forces, perhaps through a strategic alliance, to
competeforaspecicproject,ortheymayestablishadesign-buildrm.A
design-build team may be led by the architect or the contractor, although
the latter arrangement is more common. The design-build entity may also
be a design-build company with architects and contractors under one roof.
Depending on how the agreement is written, professional liability exposure
for an architect in design-build delivery may be greater than, the same as,
or less than in traditional design-bid-build delivery. The onus is typically on
the owner to select and manage the design-build team. In design-build, the
design-builder cannot make a claim to the owner for defects in the plans
andspecications,sincethedesign-builderisresponsibleforcreating
them with its own architect. Thus, the architect is not liable to the owner for
errors and omissions in its design, but may be liable to the design-builder.
In design-build, the architect and builder work together from the beginning
of the project, allowing them to work out constructability issues early
and more easily fast-track the project. The advantages of design-build:
time-savings,efciency,andreducedriskofclaimstotheowner,are
not guaranteed; but, if the design-builder and the architect have a good
working relationship, it will be more likely to attain these advantages.
Construction Management
As construction projects have become larger and more intricate, and
the design and construction industry has fragmented into ever-greater
specialization, new roles have emerged simply to cope with all that
complexity. A construction management (CM) approach to project delivery
is designed to address these issues. In it, the architect can serve the
owner in one of three distinct roles:
CM-adviser: Under a separate and distinct contract with the owner
(but not with the architect or contractor), a CM-adviser provides
expertise to owners on issues of project scope, constructability, and
procurement and management of design and construction services,
including contractor selection. The owner gains impartial advice,
but must now manage three distinct contracts instead of one or two.
The addition of a CM-adviser works well with the separate
design and construction increments of the design-bid-build
and design-negotiation-build approaches. On the other hand, it
createspotentialredundanciesandconictswiththeroleofthe
architect in a variety of matters, including contractor selection.
Itiscritical,therefore,tocarefullydenetheCM-advisersroles
and responsibilities in the contract formulation stage. The CM-
adviser may incur liability for input affecting building design and
construction.
CM-agent: A CM-agent provides a single point of contact for the
owner with an entity that is empowered to act on the owners
behalf,includinghavingthescalauthoritytocontractdirectlywith
an architect and builder. An owner who is unusually distant from a
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
335
3A
www.epcompanion.org | Emerging Professional’s Companion
Five Factors to Reduce Risk in Project Delivery
Useful guidance for establishing a sound contractual basis for effective working relationships and overall
risk management can be found in Ava Abramowitz’s book Architect’s Essentials of Contract Negotiation.
Her advice covers working with savvy clients and other experienced parties to the contract and “front-
end alignment” of goals and processes among project participants. Her analysis of a two-year study of
riskmanagementfactorsforA/Erms,carriedoutbyVictorO.Schinnerer&Company,highlightskey
riskfactorsspecicallyassociatedwithprojectdeliveryandcontractorselection.Riskmanagementin
the transition from design to construction requires thinking about more than which mode of contractor
selectionandprojectdeliverytochoose.AccordingtoAbramowitz,ve“claimspreventers”aremore
important than the project delivery method chosen:
1. Experience with the Project Delivery Approach
Experienced people succeed, more often than not, because they can anticipate and address
problems faster and better than those who are new to a situation. This is one reason everyone
should think twice before proposing delivery systems (or contracts) with which few people are
familiar.
2. Architect Involvement in Selection of Contractor or CM
Since construction contract documents are never complete, construction will go more smoothly
if the contractor, or construction manager (CM) if there is to be one, can work effectively with
thearchitecttobringtheconstructiondocumentstolife.Thisiswhysomanyclaims-freerms
volunteer a list of good contractors or CMs from which the owner may invite bids. Some of these
rmschargealowerfeeforconstructioncontractadministrationserviceswhenthecontractor
or CM is selected from their “recommended” list. Alternatively, they may add a surcharge for
construction contract administration when the owner selects a contractor not on their list.
3. Qualications-Based Contractor Selection
Thedatasuggestthatcontractorsselectedonthebasisofqualications,ratherthanbidprice
alone, perform better. The federal government and some states are beginning to recognize the
valueofqualicationsinthecontractorselectionprocess.TheU.S.ArmyCorpsofEngineers,for
example, increasingly uses a “best value” approach to contractor selection. The Corps decides
whichcontractorskillsandqualicationsarenecessary,assignsaweighttoeachofthese,and
make its selection accordingly. Cost is invariably a measure in contractor selection, but it no longer
needs to be the controlling one.
4. Early or No CM Involvement
DatashowthatthepresenceofaCMincreasedthenumberofclaimsforthermsstudiedand,
albeit to a lesser extent, increased the losses from those claims. This is not an anti-CM statement.
Often, having a CM can make all the difference; however, in many projects, CMs are brought in
too late to have their ideas and expertise incorporated into the A/E’s thinking. When that happens,
all the CM can do is “undo” the design that was bid on, under the guise of value analysis. In fact,
according to Schinnerer data, the later in the process value analysis is introduced, the more likely
it will cause a claim. Even when CMs are brought into the process early, they are other parties who
add their own ideas and objectives to the project, adding one more set of risks to be managed.
5. Adequate Schedule
Undue speed can cause problems. There is nothing inherently wrong with fast-tracking a project,
but fast-tracking without the careful detailing of an agreed-upon program and scope of work can be
dangerous.Designsimplementedatonestagemayproveinsufcientlater.Thisisespeciallytrueif
the parties’ understanding of the project objectives or design parameters change over time.
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
336
resources
3A
Emerging Professional’s Companion | www.epcompanion.org
Learn more about integrated
project delivery (IPD) by
downloading Integrated Project
Delivery: A Guide, produced
by the American Institute of
Architects.
project, such as a corporation building in a foreign country, might
use this approach. The approach is used infrequently in the public
sectorbecauseofthegrantingofscalauthority.
In terms of contractor selection, the role and responsibilities of
the CM-agent and those of the project architect need to be clearly
denedtoavoidpotentialconict.InsofarasaCM-agentacts
on behalf of the owners interests, he or she may incur liability in
addition to that for design and construction decisions.
CM-constructor: The construction-manager-as-constructor
delivery method enables the construction manager to assume
all the responsibilities and liabilities of a general contractor. The
approach is similar to traditional project delivery in that it maintains
a contractual relationship between the owner and architect. It also
offerssomeofthebenetsoftheCM-adviserapproachbybringing
advice on cost containment and constructability early on in the
process. The architect works separately with the owner to develop
documentation that delineates the scope, functional requirements,
and aesthetics of a project. These scope-of-work documents can
then be used either to competitively bid or to negotiate the selection
of the CM-constructor, and the CM-constructor architect assists
the owner in this process. The CM-constructor’s and the architect’s
responsibilities for design and construction decisions must be
carefully delineated in the contract documents.
Integrated Project Delivery
In recent years, Integrated Project Delivery (IPD), which is made possible
by sophisticated Building Information Management (BIM) has become the
focus of much discussion. With IPD, the architect, consultants, contractor,
owner, fabricator, and subcontractors joint own a 3-D computer model
of the project. Everyone shares in the liability, and collaboration among
all parties begins from the inception of the project. Each party shares its
expertise as well as the risks and rewards. The IPD approach lends itself
todesign-negotiate-buildanddesign-builddelivery,butasdenedabove,
is less practicable for traditional design-bid-build projects.
Written by Brian K. Schermer, PhD, RA
Brian Schermer is an associate professor of architecture at the Department of Architecture
at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Written by Robert Greenstreet, Int. Assoc. AIA, RIBA
Robert Greenstreet is an architect currently serving as dean of the School of Architecture
and Urban Planning at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
337
3A
www.epcompanion.org | Emerging Professional’s Companion
Take brief notes while reading the narrative and list key resources you used to complete the activities. Note
discussion outcomes from meetings with your supervisor, mentor, or consultants. When nalizing the activity
documentation (PDF), include your notes and the Emerging Professional’s Companion activity description.
notes
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
338
3A
Emerging Professional’s Companion | www.epcompanion.org
Learning from AIA Bidding Documents
Supplemental Experience for eight (8) Core IDP Hours
AIA Contract Documents provide a detailed, generally accepted procedure for contractor selection with
which all entrants should become familiar.
Download sample copies of the following AIA Contract Documents associated with the bidding process and
review them for consistency with the concepts presented in the narrative.
• A305™,Contractor’sQualicationStatement
• A310™, Bid Bond
• G612™,Owner’sInstructionstotheArchitectRegardingtheConstructionContract
• A701™, Instructions to Bidders
Activity - Core
Takealookatlecopiesofasmanyofthesedocumentsasyoucanforaprojectthatyourrmora
mentorsrmhascompletedrecently.Writeasummaryansweringthefollowingquestions:
• Which documents were utilized?
• Werethereanychangesthatyourrmhasmadeinfollowingstandardbiddingandcontract
negotiation procedures as detailed in the documents and described in the narrative?
• What was the purpose behind those changes, and did they positively or negatively affect the
outcomeofthebiddingprocessintermsofminimizingyourrm’sliabilityortheoverallsuccessof
the project?
Write a report summarizing your conclusions. Be sure to note any potential pitfalls, problems or
challenges you feel a project manager should be aware of, based on your analysis of both the documents
andthelecopies.
ShareyourworkwithyourIDPsupervisorormentorandmakesuggestedchanges.Documentthenal
version as a PDF.
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
339
3A
www.epcompanion.org | Emerging Professional’s Companion
Completion of Bid Forms for a Project
Supplemental Experience for eight (8) Core IDP Hours
WiththehelpoftheprojectmanagerinyourrmoranIDPmentor,ndasetofdrawingsthatwereissued
forbid,completedbidforms,andanyaddendathatwereissuedinyourrm’sarchives.Donotreviewthe
addenda or forms just yet.
With the bid drawings you found as the basis, complete your own set of bid forms for the project. Review
the drawings carefully and decide what, if anything you should include in an addendum to be issued to the
bidders.
Compare what you have to what was done for the original project. Make any necessary adjustments to
what you have prepared.
ShareyourworkwithyourIDPsupervisorormentorandmakesuggestedchanges.Documentthenal
version as a PDF.
Activity - Core
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
340
3A
Emerging Professional’s Companion | www.epcompanion.org
Attendance at a Pre-Bid Meeting
Supplemental Experience for eight (8) Core IDP Hours
Priortocontractorselection,potentialbiddersmayattendapre-bidconferencetoaskspecicquestions
about the project. Their perspectives are useful in gauging their concern about the procedures that will
involve them in considering their bids.
Activity - Core
Arrange to attend a pre-bid meeting in your area and take notes on the proceedings.
• What kinds of questions come up?
• How do the participants behave?
• Do they appear to use their questions to posture and jockey for advantage, or do they simply want
togettheirquestionsclaried?
• Does the process appear to follow to the steps, suggestions, and requirements described in the
narrative of this chapter?
• If the process strays from what is described in this chapter, does it put the project and the
participants at risk?
Write a memo to the individual conducting the pre-bid meeting summarizing your observations and
outliningvequestionsaskedbythecontractorswithyourproposedresponses.Includerecommendations
on how to make the next meeting for a similar project better.
ShareyourworkwithyourIDPsupervisorormentorandmakesuggestedchanges.Documentthenal
version as a PDF.
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
341
3A
www.epcompanion.org | Emerging Professional’s Companion
Attendance at a Public Bid Opening
Supplemental Experience for eight (8) Core IDP Hours
After all of the proceedings have been put into place and the bidding contractors have proposed their bids,
the bid opening brings the process to an abrupt, and hopefully productive, conclusion. Obviously, stakes can
be high, so the procedures must be followed carefully.
Attendapublicbidopeninginyourareaandtakenotesontheproceedings.Besuretoarrive30to60
minutesearlysoyouseetheprocessfromstarttonish.
• How many people arrived early? How early did they arrive?
• Were any questions asked?
• How did the bidders behave?
• Was the opening what you expected? How did it differ and why?
After the meeting concludes be sure to observe any side conversations amongst both the high and low
bidders. Prepare a report that summarizes your observations. Include overall comments from the bidders
and any obvious reasons for their comments. Also include aspects of the bid opening that were handled
well and which were not. Make any recommendations for improvement.
ShareyourworkwithyourIDPsupervisorormentorandmakesuggestedchanges.Documentthenal
version as a PDF.
Activity - Core
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
342
3A
Emerging Professional’s Companion | www.epcompanion.org
Project Delivery Approaches
Supplemental Experience for eight (8) Elective IDP Hours
Every project will exhibit its own characteristics and challenges and it is important to become familiar with as
many examples as you can.
For this activity, gather information about completed building projects or projects in progress from several
supervisorsandprojectmanagersatyourrmoryourmentorsrm.Chooseatleastthreeprojects
(preferably using three different project delivery methods, if possible).
Record information on how contractors were selected for each project using the following suggestions as
a basis for your research:
• Identify the strategies used to select contractors for each project.
• Characteristics of the projects associated with each project delivery method, including project type,
size, complexity, and client experience.
• Findoutwhatyoucanaboutthebiddingandnegotiationprocesses.Forexample,ndouthow
many bidders there were, what they bid, and which contractor was selected.
• How did the bids compare to the original estimates?
• Try to determine how the selection process set the stage for the successful completion of the
projectorforsubsequentdifculties.
• Would the project outcome have been dramatically different if another mode of delivery had been
used?
• Did any ethical dilemmas arise? Any issues of legal liability?
• Whatdidyourrmdowellintheprocess?Didthermdoanythingquestionableorworth
rethinking?
Write a report summarizing your review of the three case studies. Create a chart or matrix for quick
reference for later use.
ShareyourworkwithyourIDPsupervisorormentorandmakesuggestedchanges.Documentthenal
version as a PDF.
Activity - Elective
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
343
3A
www.epcompanion.org | Emerging Professional’s Companion
Design Without Compromise & the Bid Package
Supplemental Experience for eight (8) Elective IDP Hours
Inthisscenario,youareworkingwithaprivatefoundationtodesignofcesforitsnationalheadquarters.The
board of directors agrees in principle with your vision of an environmentally sustainable building, although
board members voice some concern about additional up-front costs related to certain features. You believe it
is better to send the project out for bid with the sustainability design concepts fully intact and to deal with the
inevitable compromises and value engineering later. The bids arrive and they are, to your client’s dismay,
much higher than anticipated. In a letter, the board expresses profound disappointment in your leadership
and professional advice. The letter contains the veiled threat of a lawsuit. You learned in school that a
project needs a strong design concept to withstand the inevitable erosion that is part of getting a building
built. In this case, though, your strategy for getting the project past the bidding stage without compromise
seemstohavebackred.
In a letter to your client, communicate what you can do to salvage the project and your relationship with
the client. Does AIA Document B101™, Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect, offer
any guidance? Download a sample copy of AIA Document B101™.
Consider questions such as these:
• Should you revise the drawings at your own expense?
• How might you have structured the contractor selection and/or bid package to deal with what you
now realize is a very unpredictable bidding environment?
ShareyourworkwithyourIDPsupervisorormentorandmakesuggestedchanges.Documentthenal
version as a PDF.
Activity - Elective
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
344
3A
Emerging Professional’s Companion | www.epcompanion.org
Rebar Construction Revokes its Bid
Supplemental Experience for eight (8) Elective IDP Hours
In this scenario, three weeks after the public bid opening for a public parking garage project, Rebar
Constructioninformsyouandyourclientthatitsbidcontainsanerrorsignicantenoughtoraisetheprice
above that of the next lowest bidder. Based on your previous experience with the contractor, you suspect
that Rebar has obtained another, more lucrative contract, and that it is concocting the error to get out of the
parking garage job. Rebar insists that it made an honest mistake and cannot be held to the bid.
Download a sample copy of AIA Document A701™, Instructions to Bidders. Prepare a memorandum to
the client addressing the following questions, and explain the reasoning behind your answers:
• Should Rebar be held to its original bid?
• Does Rebar need to prove that they made an honest error?
• Should the contractor be allowed to adjust the bid?
• Should Rebar be liable for the cost of the difference between its original bid and the next lowest?
• How would you frame the options for the client, and what are the potential consequences of each
course of action?
ShareyourworkwithyourIDPsupervisorormentorandmakesuggestedchanges.Documentthenal
version as a PDF.
Activity - Elective
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
345
3A
www.epcompanion.org | Emerging Professional’s Companion
Bids for an Elementary School
Supplemental Experience for eight (8) Elective IDP Hours
In this scenario, your practice was retained to design a new elementary school for the local school board. A
budget of $7,000,000 was set at the outset of the project, and you followed through with a comprehensive
costcontrolprogramduringdesign.Youarecondentabidorbidswillbereceivedbelowbudget.
Twodaysago,youattendedthebidopeningattheschoolboard’sofces.Youanalyzethebidresultsin
Exhibit 3A-1 and prepare a report for your client.
In the meantime, however, you have received a letter from the chairman of the school board (see Exhibit
3A-2).
All you have to work with is the bid tabulation summary as the detailed analysis has not yet arrived from
the client. You are under pressure to respond immediately. Write a response to this letter containing the
following:
• Your explanation of the gap between the low bidder and the remaining bidders
• A recommendation of whether to accept or reject the low bid
• If the low bidder is accepted, special precautions the owner should take
• If that low bidder is not accepted, address how you would deal with a likely protest from the low
bidder
• Additionalstepsyouwouldrecommendandthetimenecessarytomakeanalrecommendationto
the owner.
ShareyourworkwithyourIDPsupervisorormentorandmakesuggestedchanges.Documentthenal
version as a PDF.
Activity - Elective
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
346
3A
Emerging Professional’s Companion | www.epcompanion.org
Alternates & the Over-Budget Project
Supplemental Experience for eight (8) Elective IDP Hours
In this scenario, your client, Green Valley Center for the Performing Arts, has been planning a new facility
for nearly ten years. The budget has always been tight, and the scope of the building program ambitious. It
includes a theater, recital hall, dance studios, classrooms, and numerous ancillary facilities that will combine
to make this the premier performing arts institution in the region. Unfortunately, about 24 months ago
fundraising began to lag because of a slow regional economy, and you had to place the project on the shelf.
But now Green Valley is back—they have achieved their fundraising goals and are ready to put the project
out to bid. You are impressed by their perseverance, but you have to tell them that the local construction
market is now bustling, and the bidding climate does not look favorable. You expect the bids to come in high,
perhaps as much as 20 percent higher than you would have anticipated two years ago.
Determine how the bidding package could be structured to help the clients realize their dream. Explain in
a memorandum to the client how the bid package might be restructured using alternates to successfully
select a contractor. What are the major strategies you would suggest to your client? What other cost
savings could you recommend to them?
ShareyourworkwithyourIDPsupervisorormentorandmakesuggestedchanges.Documentthenal
version as a PDF.
Activity - Elective
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
347
3A
www.epcompanion.org | Emerging Professional’s Companion
Bidding Procedures – Public vs. Private
Supplemental Experience for eight (8) Elective IDP Hours
During the bidding process there are procedures that must be adhered to strictly. These procedures are
often very clear and somewhat scripted for public works.
Researchthepublicbiddingprocesswithinyourjurisdiction.Interviewaprojectmanagerwithinyourrm
oryourmentorsrmaboutbiddingproceduresforprivatesectorwork.Writeareportcomparingand
contrasting the two types of procedures. Be sure to note what procedures are consistent across both
areas of bidding. Include which process you believe is better and why.
ShareyourworkwithyourIDPsupervisorormentorandmakesuggestedchanges.Documentthenal
version as a PDF.
Activity - Elective
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
348
3A
Emerging Professional’s Companion | www.epcompanion.org
Pulling the Plug on the Electrical Sub
Supplemental Experience for eight (8) Elective IDP Hours
In this scenario, the contractor for a publicly bid state correctional facility project has submitted a list of
subcontractors for the job. You feel compelled to object to one of them, Flicker Electric. In your experience,
Flicker bids low and tries to make up the difference in change orders. The company often complains about
lackofcoordinationamongthearchitecturalandengineeringdrawingsandspecications.Theyhave
delayed more than one job because of their unreliability, and they have a penchant for damaging the work of
other subcontractors and then denying responsibility. The owner, Will Flicker, is unpleasant, and you would
like to avoid working with him. The problem is that eliminating Flicker will almost certainly raise the base bid
above that of the next bidder.
WriteamemorandumtothecontractorthatrejectsFlickerElectric,whileprotectingyourrmfromliability
andpreservingtheintegrityofthepublicbiddingprocess.Bemindfulofspecicpitfallsyoumustavoidin
discussingyourobjection,specically,inaccuracy,subjectivity,andhyperbole.
ShareyourworkwithyourIDPsupervisorormentorandmakesuggestedchanges.Documentthenal
version as a PDF.
Activity - Elective
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
349
3A
www.epcompanion.org | Emerging Professional’s Companion
Bidding Error on the Up and Up?
Supplemental Experience for eight (8) Elective IDP Hours
The following case was adapted from Barry Wasserman, et al., Ethics and the Practice of Architecture (John
Wiley & Sons, 2000).
In this scenario, you are hired by a small city to provide design and construction administration services for
a new elementary school building. Knowing that the $1.2 million budget for the project is tight, you work with
theclienttoprovidemaximumexibilitytoadjustthescopeoftheprojectbyincludingtwoadditivealternates
andvedeductivealternates.Fivecontractorsbidontheproject,andthebidsareannouncedinpublicat
yourofce.Representativesfromallvebiddersarepresent.ThelowestbidderisSoundConstruction.Itis
awarded the contract on the basis of its base bid; even with the additive alternates, Sound Construction is
the lowest bidder.
The next day, Sound Construction calls to inform you that its electrical subcontractor has made a serious
error,omittingthecostoflightxtures.Thetotalerroris$20,000,enoughforSoundConstructiontoseek
to add the amount to its original bid. Without the addition, Sound will have to withdraw its bid entirely. Even
withtheadditional$20,000,SoundConstruction’sbidisstillbethelowest.YourrmhasworkedwithSound
Construction before, and you believe the company is honest. You have never worked with the second lowest
bidder.
Prepare a recommendation letter to the client summarizing the situation and answering the following
questions. Be sure to explain the reasoning behind your answers:
• Should Sound Construction be allowed to adjust its bid? Provide reasons.
• Should you tell Sound Construction that its bid cannot be changed or withdrawn?
• Should you declare the lowest bid invalid and force the owner to accept the second lowest bid
which would obligate the owner to pay more for the project?
• What ethical considerations, if any, are due to the bidders?
• How does the fact that this is a publicly bid project complicate the decision?
ShareyourworkwithyourIDPsupervisorormentorandmakesuggestedchanges.Documentthenal
version as a PDF.
Activity - Elective
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
350
3A
Emerging Professional’s Companion | www.epcompanion.org
The Late Bid
Supplemental Experience for eight (8) Elective IDP Hours
In this scenario, at precisely 12:01pm, the municipality of River City, Iowa commenced with the opening of
bids for the construction of a new library. All bids were due exactly one minute earlier at noon that day. At
12:10pm, one of the local contractors, Harold Hill of Hill Construction, burst into the hearing. Apologizing
forhistardiness,Mr.Hillhandedhissealed,opaqueenvelopetothecityofcialwhowasopeningthebids
and reading them aloud. “There was a rehearsal of the marching band blocking Main Street, just as I was
approachingCityHall,”heexplained.ThecityofcialsandMarian,thelibrarian,looktoyouforguidance.You
sense an impending lawsuit from Hill if you recommend disqualifying his bid, or from the other contractors if
you do not.
WhatisyouradvicetoRiverCity,andwhatspeciclegalandcontractualpointssupportyourposition?
Write your answer in the form of a pre-emptive letter to your attorney.
ShareyourworkwithyourIDPsupervisorormentorandmakesuggestedchanges.Documentthenal
version as a PDF.
Activity - Elective
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
351
3A
www.epcompanion.org | Emerging Professional’s Companion
Exhibit 3A-1
Back to “Bids for an Elementary School”
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
352
3A
Emerging Professional’s Companion | www.epcompanion.org
Exhibit 3A-2
Back to “Bids for an Elementary School”
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
353
3A
www.epcompanion.org | Emerging Professional’s Companion
Take brief notes while reading the narrative and list key resources you used to complete the activities. Note
discussion outcomes from meetings with your supervisor, mentor, or consultants. When nalizing the activity
documentation (PDF), include your notes and the Emerging Professional’s Companion activity description.
notes
Bidding & Contract Negotiation
354
3A
Emerging Professional’s Companion | www.epcompanion.org
This page left blank intentionally.