Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
1
City of London Corporation
Whitefriars Conservation Area
Draft Character Summary and Management Strategy
Supplementary Planning Document
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
2
Sturgeon lamp standard, Victoria Embankment
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
3
This page is intentionally left blank
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
4
Several of the maps in this series on conservation area character are based upon
Ordnance Survey maps © Crown copyright and database rights 2011 Ordnance
Survey 100023243.
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
5
Introduction
7
Character summary
8
1. Location and context
8
Boundary
8
2. Designation history
9
3. Summary of character
10
4. Historical development
11
Early history
11
Seventeenth and eighteenth centuries
12
Nineteenth and twentieth centuries
14
5. Spatial analysis
17
Layout and plan form
17
Building plots
17
Building heights
17
Views and vistas
18
6. Character analysis
20
Victoria Embankment
20
Blackfriars Bridge
21
New Bridge Street & Bridewell Place
22
Tudor Street
24
Temple Avenue
27
Tallis Street
28
Carmelite Street
29
John Carpenter Street
30
7. Land uses and related activity
31
8. Architectural character
31
Architects, styles and influences
31
Building ages
33
9. Local details
34
Architectural sculpture
34
Public statuary
35
Signage and shopfronts
35
10. Building materials
36
11. Open spaces and trees
37
12. Public realm
37
13. Cultural associations
38
Management strategy
39
14. Planning policy
39
National policy
39
London-wide policy
39
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
6
City of London Corporation policy
39
Protected views
40
Sustainability and climate change
41
15. Environmental enhancement
41
16. Transport
41
17. Management of open spaces and trees
43
18. Archaeology
43
19. Enforcement
44
20. Condition of the conservation area
44
Further reading and references
45
Appendix
47
Designated heritage assets
47
Contacts
49
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
7
Introduction
The present urban form and character of the City of London (the ‘City’) has evolved
over many centuries and reflects numerous influences and interventions: the
character and sense of place is hence unique to that area, contributing at the
same time to the wider character of London.
This character summary and management strategy provides an understanding of
the significance of the conservation area by identifying and analysing its principal
characteristics. It does not include specific detail about every building and feature
within the area, and any omission from the text should not be interpreted as an
indication of lesser significance. The character summary and management strategy
has been prepared in line with the Historic England document Understanding Place:
Conservation Area Designation, Appraisal and Management (2011).
The original character summary was adopted in 1996. This document comprises an
updated character summary and added management strategy. It was adopted as
a Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) to the City of London Corporation’s
Local Plan on [DATE TBC]. It should be read in conjunction with the Local Plan and
other guidance, including Conservation Areas in the City of London, A General
Introduction to their Character (1994) which has more information on the history and
character of the City.
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
8
Character summary
1. Location and context
Whitefriars Conservation Area lies between the Temples and New Bridge Street,
fronting the Victoria Embankment. It lies entirely within the Ward of Farringdon
Without and covers an area of 6.4 hectares.
Boundary
Whitefriars’ most conspicuous boundary is the river Thames, drawn along the mid-line
of the river and including the entirety of Blackfriars Bridge. Immediately adjacent to
the bridge (just outside the CA boundary) is a queue of paired piers surviving from
the original railway bridge of 1864, with the second bridge beyond. This ensemble of
infrastructure is an arresting contrast to the more formal urban boundary with the
Temples (see below). The remainder of the eastern boundary is drawn down the
centre of New Bridge Street.
To the north the boundary is less regular, and meets the Fleet Street conservation
area at Bridewell Place. The remainder is drawn around big buildings whose
enlarged modern scale is a dramatic foil to the surviving historic parts of the
streetscape. The western boundary abuts the Inner Temple, within the Temples
conservation area. A leafy, collegiate place, the Temples form a distinct enclave
within the City and the Whitefriars boundary is enhanced by this distinctiveness. It is
an area where proposals for change need to be very carefully considered. There
are no proposals to amend the Conservation Area (CA) boundaries.
Conservation area boundary map
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
9
2. Designation history
10 December 1981 Part of the present Whitefriars Conservation Area
was designated in December 1981. The street
block circumscribed by New Bridge Street,
Bridewell Place and Tudor Street was designated
as an extension to the Fleet Street Conservation
Area in February 1990.
16 May 1991 Both areas, together with 19 New Bridge Street
(Blackfriars House) and 100 Victoria Embankment
(Unilever House), were designated as an extended
Whitefriars Conservation Area in May 1991.
28 November 2000 The Conservation Area was extended to include
Victoria Embankment, Blackfriars Bridge and
approximately half the width of the Thames to the
City of London boundary.
14 June 2007 The boundary was extended behind Northcliffe
House to follow the line of Magpie Alley and
Ashentree Court.
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
10
3. Summary of character
The characteristics which contribute to the special interest of Whitefriars
Conservation Area can be summarised as follows:
An array of consistently high-quality late Victorian and Edwardian
commercial and institutional buildings
A planned street layout uncommon in the City, set against the more
evolutionary pattern of adjacent areas
Highly varied historic land use, including Whitefriars friary precincts, domestic
tenements, industrial glass and gasworks and corporate headquarters
Associations with newspaper production, most palpably with the Harmsworth
empire
A unique sense of place created by the quiet grandeur of the Victoria
Embankment and buildings, openness of the Thames and proximity of the
Temples
The set-piece created by the transport arteries of the Victoria Embankment,
New Bridge Street and Blackfriars Bridge
Foreground to St Paul’s Cathedral and the wider City when viewed from the
South Bank and other key viewing locations
Embankment frontages
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
11
4. Historical development
Early history
In early history, much of what is now the Whitefriars conservation area was in the
Thames, the land between Tallis street and the Victoria Embankment having
gradually been reclaimed from the medieval period onwards. A small number of
prehistoric archaeological finds suggest sporadic human activity in the area before
the foundation of the Roman city.
In the Roman period it lay outside the walled town (founded in the first century AD)
and was bordered to the north by Fleet Street, the route running west towards the
Strand out of the town’s western Ludgate. The area south of the street may have
been a favourable location for later Roman villas; the remains of a building with a
tessellated floor, likely a villa, have been found underneath St Bride’s church.
Otherwise evidence for Roman occupation is comparatively low, apart from
scattered finds of tile and pottery.
Occupation of the Roman town ebbed from the fifth century AD and a new
settlement, Lundenwic, was established to the west on the Strand. Recent
excavations within the Temples immediately west of the conservation area have
revealed evidence of glassmaking, trading and burials during the Saxon period. This
has been interpreted as an important enclave of activity on the eastern fringes of
Lundenwic, suggesting continued activity in the wider area during the Saxon period.
Excavations at St Bride’s church have revealed traces of a sixth-century building,
possibly an early church. Whitefriars’ location between the old and the new
settlements would suggest the area was in use, and it probably had a suburban
character with industrial aspects.
The conservation area’s name is derived from the Carmelite Friary founded in the
1240s, on land just south of Fleet Street donated by Sir Richard de Grey. Originally a
group of lay hermits living on the slopes of Mount Carmel, they were driven to
Cyprus, Sicily and England by the Saracen reconquest of the Holy Land. Initially
located in remote parts of Northumberland and Kent, they ceased to be hermits
after coming to London, becoming more visible in the community and known as
Whitefriars after the colour of the mantle worn over their brown robes. Their initial
precinct was extended by further southerly land acquisition and reclamation from
the Thames in the fourteenth century; a river wall dating from this period was
discovered underneath Tallis Street during archaeological work.
Today, the friary precincts lie under No. 65 Fleet Street to the north of the
conservation area (a fragment of vaulted undercroft can be seen in the basement)
and the two blocks immediately to the west across Bouverie Street. Their stairs down
to the river edge lay approximately where the junction of Tallis Street and Temple
Avenue now lies, the Victoria Embankment having reclaimed further land down to
the Thames. It was a typical group of friary buildings, including church, cloister and
chapter house; their library was said to be particularly notable. After the friary was
dissolved in November 1538, the land was sold to individuals who subdivided their
plots and developed tenements on them. The pattern and layout of these parcels
influenced the subsequent street arrangement, visible on eighteenth century maps.
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
12
Bridewell Palace was built between 1515 and 1520 by Henry VIII, on the western
bank of the Fleet River in what is now the eastern part of the conservation area. It
was linked by a bridge over the Fleet to the Dominican Priory at Blackfriars. A
substantial complex of brick buildings, it was used as a place of reception for visiting
nobles. Holbein’s ‘Ambassadors’ was painted there in 1531. Two years later it was
given to the City by Edward VI for use as a workhouse and prison, a function it would
fulfil until 1855.
Agas map, c.1570
Seventeenth and eighteenth centuries
Later in the 16th century the inhabitants of the Whitefriars area claimed to be
exempt from the City’s jurisdiction, a claim permitted by Queen Elizabeth I in 1580
and confirmed by James I in a charter of 1608. From about this time the area was
known as ‘Alsatia’ (after the disputed continental territory of Alsace), a sanctuary for
debtors whose criminality and squalor was notorious. These unusual privileges were
repealed in 1697, but the notoriety lingered; what is now Hutton Street just north of
the conservation area was known for years as ‘Wilderness Street’.
Whitefriars had considerable associations with the theatre during the seventeenth
century. The Whitefriars theatre, of uncertain foundation date, operated from the
former friary refectory until 1614. Following this, the Salisbury Court theatre was built in
1629 by Richard Gunnell and William Blagove, hosting plays by Prince Charles’s men
and the Queen’s men until the formal suppression of theatre under the
Commonwealth in 1642. Plays continued to be performed illicitly in the theatre and
its interior was destroyed during a raid by soldiers in 1649. After the Restoration the
theatre was restored and reopened, but was destroyed in the Great Fire and
replaced by the Dorset Garden theatre, also known as the Duke’s theatre, in 1671
on the current site of 60 Victoria Embankment. Sir Christopher Wren is said to have
designed the new theatre, though this attribution is uncertain. It hosted
performances by the Duke’s Company, whose patron was James, Duke of York and
further James II. The theatre was demolished in the early eighteenth century.
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
13
The Great Fire completely destroyed the district and, as with much of the City, it was
reconstructed to a similar street and plot configuration. The tenements on the former
friary precincts were rebuilt within a broadly similar arrangement of post-dissolution
land parcels as before. Bridewell was rebuilt to a different plan centred on two
courtyards. Archaeological excavation indicates that the waterfront revetments
were extensively rebuilt after the fire, in some cases with ship timbers.
Horwood’s map, 1799
By the C17 wharves and warehouses had replaced the gardens and orchards that
had previously run down to the waterfront; the Worshipful Company of Carpenters
leased a wharf in Whitefriars in the late 17th century. A notable new enterprise was
the New River Company, established to transport fresh water into London from
Hertfordshire through a conduit, the ‘New River’. The Company began operating
from Whitefriars in 1717, occupying various premises until 1820. The arrival of the New
River coincided with the concealment of the old Fleet, which bordered Whitefriars to
the east. Now known as a ‘ditch’ rather than a river (in reference to its heavily
polluted state), the Fleet was completely covered over in 1764 to form New Bridge
Street, the approach to the new Blackfriars Bridge, designed by Robert Mylne and
opened in 1769. This was a time of general upheaval: further to the east, the old
Ludgate and Roman and medieval city wall were demolished, removing the visible
distinction of Whitefriars as a place outside the original limits of the City. Aside from
this, the remainder of the conservation area retained its seventeenth century street
configuration.
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
14
Trade card for Hopton, Hanson & Stafford Glass c.1759
Museum of London
Nineteenth, twentieth and twenty-first centuries
Between 1802 and 1809 James Lewis renewed the east range of Bridewell, from
which the gatehouse survives on New Bridge Street. The prison was closed in
1855, and the other buildings demolished in the 1860s. The establishment of the
City gasworks near Water Lane in 1814 brought heavier industry to the area. In
1834 James Powell purchased the long-established Whitefriars Glass Company,
which may have been the glazier’s workshop recorded on Temple Street in 1789.
The street was renamed Tudor Street in the 19th century and it was from here that
the Company operated until it moved to Wealdstone in 1923. The gasworks
closed in the 1870s.
Around this time the street layout underwent considerable rationalisation, which
produced a regularity that is very unusual within the City’s otherwise evolutionary
street network. This was made feasible by the construction of the Victoria
Embankment between 1864-70 and the widening and extension of routes such as
Tudor Street, removing the slums for which the area had become notorious. At
the same time Blackfriars Bridge was rebuilt, completed in 1869, to designs by
Joseph Cubitt and Queen Victoria Street joined it to the heart of the City in 1871.
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
15
O/S map c.1880
The City Corporation was the main landowner in the area, and these changes
realised its plans for a salubrious grid of real estate, far removed from ‘Alsatia’;
attracted by the improved, gas-lit streets, businesses and institutions relocated
here. In the early 1880s the City of London Boys School was constructed on the
site of the former gasworks, with the City of London Girls School and the Guildhall
School of Music built to the north in the 1890s. Other institutions, Sion College and
the Metropolitan Asylums Board, occupied sites on the embankment facing the
river. The remainder of the grid was occupied by the buildings of the newspaper
industry, of which a number survive.
Fleet Street was synonymous with the newspaper industry. To the south, the newly
established grid layout of large plots made Whitefriars a good place for the
buildings of newspaper production: large-scale printing works and offices often
combined in one building. Examples of these survive throughout the conservation
area, such as the Argus Printing Company at the junction of Temple Avenue and
Tudor Street, or Northcliffe House where Whitefriars Street meets Tudor Street (on
the site of the former glassworks).
The area has particular associations with the founders of the Daily Mail, the
Harmsworth brothers, Alfred (later Viscount Northcliffe) and Harold (later Viscount
Rothermere), who owned and ran newspapers from several businesses in the
area. One of their first offices was at 24 Tudor Street in 1893; one of their last was
Northcliffe House, built next door in 1925-7. With the birth of the Daily Mail and
Daily Mirror and the maturity of the Harmsworth empire, the area was identified
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
16
as central to the history of the newspaper industry, while many of the buildings
reflect, in architectural terms, its emerging prestige.
Sweeping the corner of the Embankment and New Bridge Street, Unilever House
was built in the thirties as prestige headquarters for that firm, like J.P. Morgan’s
large building on John Carpenter Street of the late eighties. At this time the
newspaper industry was withdrawing from Whitefriars to the Docklands and
elsewhere; their large, inner-city sites were ideally suited for the large floorplates
required by professional firms following the deregulation of the markets in the
eighties. The schools and other institutions had departed from the area by the
end of the twentieth century. Whitefriars today has a quieter character than its
history might suggest.
More recent developments have generally respected the urban form and scale of
the area as it was established by the late 19th century.
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
17
5. Spatial analysis
Layout and plan form
Whitefriars once had the intricate network of medieval streets, lanes and courts found
elsewhere in the City, but a programme of slum clearance, de-industrialisation and
land reclamation significantly changed its topography during the late Victorian period.
These changes created a formally conceived grid of streets uncommon in the context
of the City. A chief characteristic of Whitefriars is the high permeability and level of
visibility between streets created by the grid. Sequences of buildings follow a logical
progression, with the grandest frontages facing the river with more understated but
equally decorative frontages on the subsidiary streets. There are clearly legible routes
into, within and outside the area.
The flat topography created by reclamation from the Thames provides a local contrast
with the incline and curve of Fleet Street and the routes running south from it. The
openness created by the river and the Embankment is a rarity in the City, as are the
long views of City landmarks and riverfront possible from Blackfriars Bridge.
Building plots
Plots are generally large within the conservation area, with buildings such as Temple
Chambers and Telephone House occupying substantial sites. Some of these large
footprints were created by the newspaper headquarters that were built here during
the boom years of the industry. Carmelite House (frontage to Tallis Street) and
Northcliffe House are surviving examples of this sort of building.
The smaller buildings on Tudor Street reflect or occupy original plots, some with
particular associations with the press. The exception is the one substantial new
development in granite occupying part of two street blocks on Tudor Street. The
block bounded by Bridewell Place and New Bridge Street contain plots of a type
similar to those on Fleet Street, and in other districts of the City.
Building heights
The buildings are principally those of the late Victorian/Edwardian newspaper and
associated industry and have a regular scale, matching the regularity in the street
layout. Occasional smaller buildings such as 2-4 Tudor Street vary this with a more
intimate, human scale.
Robust blocks of architecturally varied, richly modelled and detailed Victorian
and Edwardian buildings attain a cohesive four to five storeys in height. Some
buildings have small turrets or other rooftop elements that add variety to the roofline.
This height is generally matched by more recent developments in the area, creating
a valuable consistency in scale.
The distinctive group of five to six storeys, mostly listed, buildings forming the
complete frontage to Victoria Embankment and New Bridge Street creates a
dignified civic river frontage and introduction to the City.
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
18
The townscape effect is one of visual variety and exuberance, achieving both a
pleasing harmony and a strong commercial identity while retaining a human scale.
The conservation area is predominantly within the St Paul’s Heights policy area,
which since the 1930s has regulated the heights of buildings to safeguard views of St
Paul’s Cathedral.
Views and vistas
Whitefriars grid of streets enables linear views north/south/east/west along the
compass points between streets. Of particular note are views across the river and
west to the Temples. The river frontage forms a valuable and distinctive part of
the City skyline in views across the river, and from a significant distance along the
river to east and west. In particular, Blackfriars Bridge offers splendid prospects of
City landmarks, including St Paul’s Cathedral and the City waterfront.
The conservation area lies within the viewing corridors of two London View
Management Framework Protected Views and eight River Prospect Views. The
majority of the area is covered by the St Paul’s Heights policy area, and parts of it fall
within the Monument Views policy area. See the ‘Protected Views’ section of the
Management Strategy for more information.
The following illustrates the range of distant and local views which exist in the
Whitefriars Conservation Area. This list is not comprehensive, and the area provides
further opportunities to capture long, short and kinetic views.
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
19
1. View of St Paul’s Cathedral from Blackfriars Bridge
2. View of the Victoria Embankment from Blackfriars Bridge
3. View towards New Bridge Street from Blackfriars Bridge
4. View of Blackfriars Bridge from the Embankment
5. View of Embankment frontages from opposite Hamilton House
6. View into the Temple gardens from opposite Hamilton House
7. View north up Temple Avenue from the Embankment
8. View north up Carmelite Street from the Embankment
9. View north up John Carpenter Street from the Embankment
10. View of Unilever House from the northern end of Blackfriars Bridge
11. View towards Blackfriars Bridge from No. 13 New Bridge Street
12. View west along Tudor Street from New Bridge Street
13. View north up Bridewell Place from Tudor Street
14. View east along Tudor Street from the boundary with the Temples
15. View south down Temple Avenue towards the Embankment
16. View south down Carmelite Street towards the Embankment
17. View south down John Carpenter Street towards the Embankment
18. View east along Tallis Street from Temple Chambers
19. View west along Tallis Street from John Carpenter Street
Additionally, noteworthy views of the conservation area are possible from
Waterloo Bridge and the South Bank.
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
20
6. Character analysis
Victoria Embankment (W-E)
Hamilton House Former Sion College & City of London School
Victoria Embankment was completed in 1870 to a plan by Sir Joseph Bazalgette,
straightening the previously irregular waterfront with a broad new carriageway. A
few years later the grid of streets was developed immediately to the north. The
broadness of the Embankment is accented by the adjacent Thames, together
creating a valuable sense of openness rare in the City. The narrow, more urban
views north along Temple Avenue, Carmelite Street and John Carpenter Street
offer juxtaposition with this open quality. Trees are planted towards the western
part, providing a welcome green enclave with the nearby Temple gardens.
Along the waterfront there are sculptural features of interest: regularly spaced
iron sturgeon lampstands ornamented with marine motifs and lions head mooring
rings on the river wall.
The ornate, richly detailed, late 19th century buildings facing the Thames give the
Embankment a sense of quiet grandeur. Hamilton House (by Sir William Emerson)
has a stately Portland stone frontage in a Renaissance style with a contrasting
band of sandstone at the upper levels. This is set back from the street behind a
row of decorated stone piers and railings enclosing a small garden. Opposite, the
Baroque Embankment elevation of Telephone House (No. 40, see Temple
Avenue) is similarly recessed behind a garden and railings, and both buildings
have prominent gables at roof level. The shared materials but subtle stylistic
variations give depth to the street scene.
Audit House (No. 58) was formerly the Employment Appeal Tribunal. It has a more
understated red brick elevation with stone dressings and projecting end bays
with classical details. The varying use of Portland stone and red brick as the
dominant building materials are an important hallmark of the conservation area.
At the time of writing, the building is undergoing redevelopment behind the
retained Embankment façade. Carmelite House (No. 50) is a less successful
recent development that would have profited from further depth and modelling
to its elevations. The boldly contemporary approach is too abrupt a statement
within the sequence of generously detailed historic frontages.
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
21
No. 9 Carmelite Street housed the former Thames Conservancy Offices. The red
brick with Gothic details complement the neighbouring former Sion College (No.
56, by Sir Arthur Blomfield), which has an elaborately detailed Gothic revival
frontage. Both buildings provide a welcome contrast with the simplicity of
Carmelite House. Of red brick with stone detailing, No. 56 has a profusion of oriel
windows, buttresses, turrets, pinnacles and window tracery that create a wealth
of visual interest and evoke the building’s former use as an ecclesiastical college.
A later brick screen punctuated with slim traceried openings creates regularity at
street level. The collegiate effect is complemented by the institutional
architecture of the former City of London School (No. 60). Built in 1880-82 to
designs by Davis & Emmanuel, it has an elaborate Portland stone frontage with
pink granite columns, classical detailing and prominent sculpture of famous
figures and disciplines. It has a striking, steeply pitched roof with octagonal
lantern and corner turrets, and completes the run of buildings in an appropriately
ornate manner.
After the Temples, the Victoria Embankment frontages have an important role as
an introduction to the City when approached along the Thames from the west.
This area will be significantly altered by the forthcoming Thames Tideway Tunnel
works, which propose the construction of a new pier and public space alongside
the Embankment. Furthermore, the proposed Cycle Superhighway will have a
visual impact on the Blackfriars Bridge and New Bridge Street (below).
Retained façade of Audit House Blackfriars Bridge lamp standard
Blackfriars Bridge was erected in 1869 to designs by James Cubitt, replacing the
previous bridge by Robert Mylne. It spans the Thames with five shallow, segmental
arches of cast iron springing from granite abutments. These are capped with
squat columns supporting pedestrian niches linked by a decorative iron
balustrade. Along the centre run slender original lamp standards, valuable
survivals of their kind. The bridge’s restrained gothic detailing complements the
adjacent 19th century frontages on the Embankment, with which it forms a set-
piece commemorating the era of Victorian public improvement works. The
bridge is named from the Blackfriars friary that was located on the eastern bank
of the river Fleet.
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
22
Blackfriars Bridge
Moored opposite Hamilton House is HMS President, a former Royal Navy sloop
built in 1917 by Lobnitz & Co Ltd for convoy escort duty. Located at this mooring
on the Victoria Embankment since 1922, she was used as a Royal Navy Reserve
training ship until 1989. She was originally named HMS Saxifrage, a genus of plants
that includes London Pride, underlining her long connection with the city. HMS
President is included on the National Register of Historic Vessels administered by
National Historic Ships UK. Facing the dignified frontages of Hamilton and
Telephone House, the boat further augments the historicity of this part of the
conservation area.
New Bridge Street (S-N) & Bridewell Place
14 &19 New Bridge Street
Laid out in 1764, New Bridge Street was created as an approach to the first
Blackfriars Bridge (designed by Robert Mylne) and covered over the Fleet River,
the line of which it follows. The bridge approach has been intensively developed:
originally a small square named Chatham Place, it was reconstructed after the
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
23
building of the current bridge, altered for the creation of Queen Victoria Street
and again to its present form in 1963 for the Blackfriars Underpass. A statue of
Queen Victoria commemorates the 19th century work, while on the eastern side
of New Bridge Street a K2 telephone kiosk and temperance drinking fountain are
street furniture of further interest. The buildings on the street are generally larger
than those on the Embankment, and are set back from the street behind iron
railings.
Addressing the road, the bridge and the river is Unilever House, built in 1930-2 to
designs by J. Lomax Simpson with Burnet, Tait & Partners. The building is a grand
classical composition in Portland stone whose curve acts as a monumental pivot
between New Bridge Street and the Embankment. A row of giant Ionic columns
gives the façade rhythm and verticality, and the scale of the building is offset by
its modelling and detailing, particularly to the recessed upper storeys. Flanking
equestrian sculpture adds further interest. It has been called the largest of the
‘prestige headquarters’ built for large City firms between the wars. Along with the
Faraday Building nearby, this ‘lofty edifice’ instigated the development of the St
Paul’s Heights policy, designed to control development around the Cathedral to
preserve views of its setting.
No. 19 (formerly Blackfriars House, built 1913-17 and now a hotel) has a similarly
large scale but with a subtler, stripped classical treatment executed in white
glazed faience, an unusual treatment in the City. Well-modelled facades
alleviate its large scale. The building is recessed behind railings and ironwork
arches that add interest to the street scene, complemented by decorative iron
balconies at first floor. No. 16-18 was built in 1903-5 as the headquarters of the
London Missionary Society (commemorated by a plaque). Here, the large scale
of the previous buildings is repeated in a stone Baroque composition, with
detailing echoing that of Telephone House (see above).
No. 15 begins a sequence of more compact buildings along the street whose
lower scale is an effective prelude to the larger buildings previously described.
The group is united by shared motifs and verticality of pilasters. No. 15 has an
understated stone frontage with 18th century detailing and ornamental
balconies at first floor level, its subtlety providing a favourable contrast with the
larger buildings. No. 14 is the former gatehouse of Bridewell Hospital (James Lewis,
1802-8), with a fine stone classical frontage behind iron railings. No. 13 is
constructed in brick with stucco dressings in an eclectic style, with French and
Classical motifs reminiscent of the Victorian commercial architecture of Ludgate
Circus. Its frontage turns onto Bridewell Place, a dog-leg named after the former
palace and hospital on this site. No. 9 has brown brick upper storeys over an
open stone colonnade, traditional materials sympathetic to the context of the
conservation area, though its upper storeys are of an incongruous height. This
elevation to Bridewell Place forms the rear setting of the buildings on New Bridge
Street and could be enhanced.
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
24
Tudor Street
Tudor Street, looking east towards New Bridge Street
Tudor Street was formed by extending King Tudor Street (established by the 17th
century) westwards from New Bridge Street towards the Inner Temple in the 19th
century. It forms the northern edge of the street grid laid out by the City of
London Corporation in the 1880s. There is an important contrast between the
commercial bustle of New Bridge Street at the eastern end and the relative
serenity of the Temples, glimpsed through an archway at its western end.
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
25
North side
No. 2-3 Northcliffe House No. 24
After the flank elevations of No. 16-18 and No. 19 New Bridge Street, No. 2-4 is the
former Institute of Journalists, constructed between 1902-4 in a Queen Anne style.
It has a pleasing modesty that is derived from its low scale, traditional roof form
and simple Classical details. Other surviving newspaper buildings in the
conservation area share the red brick and stone idiom. On a similarly modest
scale, No. 24 is an early 19th century detached house with later shops, the pale
stucco and crisp detailing of which compare well with surrounding buildings of
different styles. It has a domestic character uncommon in the conservation area,
an important survival of the period before the streets were laid out in their current
form.
Northcliffe House (No. 26) is the former combined offices and printing workshops
of Associated Newspapers, a function indicated by large expanses of glazing on
the elevations (to allow the maximum amount of light for typesetting and
compositing). The building occupies the former site of the Whitefriars Glassworks.
Steel framed and clad in stone, it is an important example of the design solutions
achieved in housing the different elements of newspaper production on the
same site (for example, it was the first British newspaper printing office to have
reel fed from beneath the printing presses). It was built in 1925-5 to designs by Ellis
and Clarke, and has an understated Classical/neo-Egyptian character found
elsewhere at the former Daily Telegraph building on Fleet Street. The elevations to
Tudor Street and Whitefriars Street are finely detailed and modelled, while the
octagonal turret adds interest to the roofline.
No. 28 is the former White Swan Tavern, which shares the height and Classical
motifs of Northcliffe House but expresses them differently. The street elevation is of
brick with slender stone pilasters and other ornaments, a mixture echoed at No.
2-4 and characteristic of the conservation area. At the junction of Tudor Street
and Bouverie Street (east side) is a contemporary stone and glass building that
presents a long brick and stone elevation to Bouverie Street. It has recessed
upper storeys that are sympathetic to the scale of the conservation area.
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
26
South side
No. 25 Gateway to the Temples
With its neighbour No. 3-5, No. 15-17 has a large granite elevation with irregular
window openings and classical accents cast in a modern style. The building’s
forceful bulk clashes with its surroundings to some extent, but its bold post-
modernity has historic value. No. 21 is a modern development that gives a
contemporary treatment to traditional materials. Circular stone columns divide
the bays, which contain projecting rectangular windows clad in orange tiles and
linked by thin metal bars. The façade has a similar rhythm to that of Northcliffe
House opposite but is less forceful, with a weightless quality imparted by its
materials. The block bounded by Tudor Street, Temple Avenue, Tallis Street and
Carmelite Street is part of this development, which skilfully incorporated the
frontages of many historic buildings.
No. 25 is the former premises of the Argus Printing Company. Of stone and red
brick with Ruabon terracotta dressings, it is a muscular building enhanced by the
wealth of detail on both facades. The ground floor has keystones featuring
grotesque heads, while the corner holds a carving of the company’s insignia.
Higher up, bands of delicate terracotta detail are woven underneath stone
mullion and transom windows. This assemblage of materials, motifs and upper
level detailing creates a highly individual character. Loading bays at the end of
the Temple Avenue elevation give an indication of the original design as printing
works. It forms a group with Northcliffe House and the former White Horse Tavern
enhancing the conservation area.
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
27
Temple Avenue
Temple Chambers (detail) Telephone House (detail)
Part of the grid of streets laid out by the City Corporation in the 1880s, Temple
Avenue is one of three streets that connect Tudor Street with the Victoria
Embankment (the others are Carmelite Street and John Carpenter Street). Views
south down these streets offer prospects of the river framed by the ornate
architecture of the river frontages, while views north from the river into the urban
realm are an effective foil to the openness of the Embankment and Thames. Both
sets of views are key elements of the character of the conservation area.
East side
Temple House (No. 6) has a red brick and stone façade with Classical detailing
and projecting oriel windows, some of which contain stained glass. These give a
strong sense of rhythm to both frontages (the other on Tallis Street), further
enhanced by the arched openings at ground floor. A small clock tower crowned
with a pediment adds interest at roof level, while at ground level iron railings to
the street create a neatness shared by nearby buildings.
The main frontage of Telephone House (No. 2-4) is a monumental contrast with
the previous building. The stately twenty-one bay elevation is designed in a
Baroque style and executed in stone with rich modelling and ornamentation,
particularly at the upper levels. It was built as the London headquarters of the
National Telephone Company, a wealthy organisation that amalgamated early
provincial telephone networks into a national system. These origins remain
evident in the first floor sculptures of cherubs grasping early telephone handsets.
West side
Practically all of the west side of Temple Avenue is occupied by Temple
Chambers (No. 3-7), a range of purpose-built legal chambers completed in 1887.
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
28
The stone frontage has understated Jacobean and Classical accents and
contains many projecting and recessed sections providing rhythm to the long
frontage. The central bay has a carved stone doorcase with sculpture, detailing
and lettering. The whole elevation is recessed from the street behind an intact run
of decorative iron railings. Their traditional roof forms and chimney stacks survive,
which are instrumental in providing a sympathetic setting to the neighbouring
Inner Temple. With the other buildings on Temple Avenue the overall effect is one
of orderly sophistication.
Tallis Street
Former Guildhall School of Music No. 2 & Carmelite House
Tallis Street is named after the 16th century English composer, Thomas Tallis,
whose name is among those inscribed on the former Guildhall School of Music
(No.1). It forms an intersection between the three north-south streets, and partially
marks the line of the old waterfront before its extension to form the Embankment.
The former Guildhall School of Music was constructed between 1885-7 to a Neo-
classical design by Sir Horace Jones, Surveyor to the City of London, who was
responsible for notable City buildings such as Tower Bridge and Leadenhall
Market. The building has predominantly classical details executed in stone, with
inscriptions located between decorated terracotta panels and a row of elliptical
windows on the upper levels. The return elevations to Carmelite Street and John
Carpenter Street are slightly plainer, except for a northern extension of 1897-8
that is taller and more ornamented with the names of composers inscribed upon
it.
Opposite on Tallis Street, Tallis House (No. 2, by Royce, Hurley and Stewart)
provides a modern interpretation of themes within in the conservation area, with
the red brick, banded stone and projecting oriel windows recalling Temple House
(see above). Though these contextual aspects of the design are praiseworthy,
the building ultimately falls short of the refinement characteristic of other
buildings in the conservation area.
Whitefriars House (No. 6) was formerly the premises of the National Press Agency.
Of red brick detailed with café-au-lait terracotta, it has a well-proportioned
mixture of bow windows, understated classical elements and applied arcading.
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
29
The corner bay successfully addresses the junction of Tallis Street and Carmelite
Street with a terracotta doorcase, oriel window and archway.
Continuing the newspaper derivation, Carmelite House (Tallis Street and
Carmelite Street elevations) was designed by H.O. Ellis for Lord Northcliffe’s
Associated Newspapers in a monumental neo-Tudor style. Built between 1897-9, it
is the oldest survivor of the combined newspaper factories and offices that once
proliferated in the area. Surviving iron cranes and the large expanses of glazing
attest to this former function (and make an instructive comparison with Northcliffe
House on Tudor Street). The rich modelling and alternating bands of stonework
and brickwork echo themes elsewhere in the conservation area. As an expression
of corporate power, the building complements Telephone House (see above),
which it adjoins.
Carmelite Street
North-east side Former Whitefriars Fire Station
The elevations on Carmelite Street are predominantly the flanks of other buildings
described on Tudor Street, Tallis Street and the Victoria Embankment. They are a
blend of stonework, brick and stone/terracotta dressings typical of the
conservation area. The street is named from the Carmelite Friary (Whitefriars) that
existed immediately to the north of the conservation area.
On the west side, the façade of the former Wheatsheaf House (formerly No. 4)
survives incorporated into a later development. A former warehouse, it has red
brick piers with stone detailing carried on an arcade of six columns with yellow
brick detailing. A small Italianate turret adds interest at roof level.
No. 7 was the Whitefriars Fire Station, formerly the main fire station of the City
division. Constructed between 1896-7 to designs by the L.C.C Architects
Department, it has simple neo-Tudor detailing and a prominent gable that sits
well alongside the former Sion College (see above). Three openings capped by
Tudor arches at ground level, now blocked, indicate the exit and entry points for
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
30
horse-drawn fire engines. It has a lacklustre modern elevation to John Carpenter
Street.
John Carpenter Street
John Carpenter was a Town Clerk of the City of London who in the 15th century
left a bequest enabling the foundation of the City of London School, which
occupied a site on the Embankment at the end of the street. Most of the street
contains the flank elevations of buildings described above. The southern end of
the street is pedestrianised, an attractive space framed by planting, benches,
sculpture and the flank elevations of the former City of London School and
former Sion College.
John Carpenter Street from the Embankment
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
31
7. Land uses and related activity
The p r ese n t uses a r e principally office, with dispersed secondary
catering,
hotel
and retail uses. The diversity of activity and
associated
vitality has been
diluted by the relocation of the
schools
and the recent dispersal of the press,
printing
and
publishing
industries. There are some buildings in residential use, but
these account for a low proportion overall.
8. Architectural character
Architects, styles and influences
Whitefriars’ comprehensive redevelopment in the latter decades of the 19th century
created an overall harmony in architectural character, marked by subtle gradations
in style, scale and materials. As intended, it attracted relatively prestigious businesses
and institutions with the resources for opulent buildings, transforming this riverfront
area from a place of industry to one of architectural expression. The City
Corporation had some stylistic influence: the former Thames Conservancy Offices
(No. 9 Carmelite Street with an Embankment frontage) are said to have been
constructed in a Gothic style to match neighbouring Sion College at the
Corporation’s behest.
Former Thames Conservancy Offices (later) & former Sion College (earlier)
Generally, the calibre of architects working in Whitefriars was high. Sir Horace Jones
was responsible for many City buildings that are now acclaimed landmarks (such as
Tower Bridge), and the Guildhall School of Music was one of his last works. Sir Arthur
Blomfield (Sion College) was an important and prolific exponent of the Gothic
revival, while Sir William Emerson (Hamilton House) designed a number of high-profile
buildings in India, then part of the British Empire. Sir Joseph Bazalgette, the engineer
responsible for the Victoria Embankment, is well known for designing London’s sewer
system.
Other architects were locally prolific: James Lewis (No. 14 New Bridge Street) was
surveyor to Christ’s and Bethlem Hospitals in addition to Bridewell, while Ellis and
Clarke (Northcliffe House) worked with Sir Owen Williams on the Daily Express building
in Fleet Street. John Whichcord Junior (Temple Chambers) built numerous offices in
the City, including the former National Safe Deposit at No. 1 Queen Victoria Street
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
32
(now the City of London Magistrates’ Court). Thomas Tait designed Unilever House
with James Lomax-Simpson, and was partly responsible for the Daily Telegraph
building on Fleet Street.
Blackfriars Bridge was designed by Joseph Cubitt and the original neighbouring
railway bridge of 1862-4 (of which only the piers remain) was also his design. Beyond,
the second Blackfriars Railway Bridge of 1886 (originally St Paul’s Railway Bridge) was
designed by John Wolfe-Barry and Henry Marc Brunel.
Whitefriars exhibits the eclectic variety and bombast typical of late
Victorian/Edwardian commercial architecture. Corporate exuberance can be seen
at Telephone House (Baroque), Unilever House (Classical), Northcliffe House
(Classical/neo-Egyptian) and Carmelite House (Tallis Street elevation, neo-Tudor).
While these buildings are largely of one style, others are more eclectic, mingling
Classical, Tudor, Queen Anne or Jacobean devices, such as at No. 25 Tudor Street,
neighbouring No. 6 Temple Avenue or No. 13 Bridewell Place. The former City of
London School combines varying motifs within an overarching Northern Renaissance
style.
Temple Chambers, Temple Avenue
A more understated architecture is offered by Temple Chambers, an effective
segue into the Temples across the border of the conservation area. Further variety is
found in the Georgian domesticity of No. 24 Tudor Street and the 20th century
faience cladding of No. 19 New Bridge Street. Blackfriars Bridge is an example of
engineering functionality enlivened with Gothic detailing that complements that at
Sion College.
While the range of styles and motifs listed above appears broad, the buildings’ close
date range, small material palette and quality of execution results in an overall
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
33
consistency of scale and appearance that is key to the conservation area’s
character.
Building ages
The buildings in Whitefriars all date from the 19th, 20th and 21st centuries. Earliest
among them are the former Bridewell Gatehouse (No. 14 New Bridge Street) and
No. 24 Tudor Street, both dating from the early 19th century. One of the catalysts for
Whitefriars’ redevelopment was the completion of the Victoria Embankment in 1870,
following which the grid of streets and buildings were laid out, commencing with the
City of London School in 1880-82. Buildings on the southern end of New Bridge Street
are either early 20th century or interwar. There are some postwar and early 21st
century buildings, but these account for a low proportion overall. More recent
developments have regularly incorporated the retained facades of earlier buildings.
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
34
9. Local details
Architectural sculpture
Cherubs with telephone handsets, Telephone House
Architectural sculpture is regularly to be found in Whitefriars. Predominantly
executed in carved stone, it was a suitable method of enrichment that reflected the
prominence of institutions and businesses relocating to the area.
In many cases architectural sculpture provides an indication of the building’s original
use or occupant. Telephone House displays a number of stone cherubs holding old-
fashioned telephone receivers, while No. 25 Tudor Street bears the crest of the Argus
Printing Company, who commissioned the building. The former City of London
School has statues of John Milton, Isaac Newton, Shakespeare, Sir Thomas More and
Francis Bacon at high level, flanked by personifications of disciplines such as Classics,
Geometry, and Mechanics.
Sculptures at Unilever House were executed by two high-profile contemporary
sculptors: Sir William Reid Dick and Gilbert Ledward. The former was responsible for
two sculptures of colossal shire horses restrained by female figures that flank the
building. The latter contributed reliefs of mermaid and merman on the keystones
above the doors.
Shire horses, Unilever House
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
35
The piers of Blackfriars Bridge are enriched with sculptures of water birds by John
Birnie Philip. On the seaward side, the carvings depict marine life and seabirds, while
on the landward or western side the piers have freshwater birds, reflecting the tidal
watershed at this location on the river.
The iron lampstands on the Embankment were designed by George Vuillamy and
decorated with entwined pairs of dolphins. The Metropolitan Board of Works took
the unusual (for the time) step of publicly consulting on a number of designs before
selecting this final model. The lions head mooring rings were designed by Timothy
Butler.
Public statuary
A statue of Queen Victoria (1896 by CB Birch) marks the northern approach to
Blackfriars Bridge and serves to commemorate the Embankment, Blackfriars Bridge
and Holborn Viaduct, all of which were completed under her reign.
Nearby on New Bridge Street is a Temperance drinking fountain, originally located at
Bank Junction outside the Royal Exchange, where it was erected in 1861. It carries
bronze sculptures of dolphins at the base and a figure of Temperance above.
At the end of John Carpenter Street is a bronze statue of a businessman hailing a
taxi, cast in 1983 by J. Seward Johnson Jr.
Signage and shopfronts
Whitefriars contains few instances of shopfronts and signage because the character
of the area is not predominantly retail-led. No. 13 New Bridge Street has an oversized
modern box fascia that clashes with the understated architectural detailing above.
No. 24 Tudor Street has unsympathetic modern shopfronts, while No. 28 has more
low-key signage.
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
36
10. Building materials
Temple House, Carmelite House and Telephone House (details)
Buildings are constructed in a range of traditional materials - principally Portland and
Bath stones, brick and terracotta - used individually, but more frequently in
combination. Much of Whitefriars’ character is down to the interplay of red
brickwork and pale stonework, and the subtle variations in the way these materials
are combined.
Some buildings (Temple Chambers, Guildhall School of Music) have wholly stone
frontages; others (Sion College, Former Argus Printing Company) depend chiefly on
the use of brick. In between are a number of buildings that freely mingle these
materials, often in bands, using them either for detailing or for the main body of a
façade.
Terracotta (either café-au-lait or bright red) is used to good effect, while long
expanses of iron railings, painted black, often with varying finials, give many of the
streets a quiet dignity.
Traditional timber windows survive on many buildings in the conservation area. They
preserve and enhance the character of the conservation area and should be
retained or incorporated into new buildings wherever possible.
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
37
11. Open spaces and trees
Whitefriars southern parts offer an alternative to the intricately composed urban
grain found throughout much of the City. The right-angle of Blackfriars Bridge and
the Embankment is a place for pedestrians to enjoy open land, river and sky in a
manner rare elsewhere.
This is enhanced by a regular building line set back from these areas, leaving the
bridge approach particularly clear. The planted space here is important in
maintaining the open quality of this part of the conservation area and softening the
impact of the road network.
Trees, ornate frontages and the hubbub of New Bridge Street girdle this openness.
The relationship between these areas and the nearby Temple Gardens is also
significant, the combination of the two forming a unique ensemble of open spaces.
A more recent open space can be found at the newly pedestrianised end of John
Carpenter Street. Silver birch trees, planting, benches and sculpture moderate the
urbanity of the environment.
12. Public realm
The footways of the conservation area are predominantly laid in York stone edged
with granite kerbs. The carriageways are laid in asphalt. City Corporation bollards
are present on numerous streets. There is a small amount of historic granite setts at
the southern tip of John Carpenter Street.
Completed and planned public realm environmental enhancement projects are
identified in the Management Strategy below.
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
38
13. Cultural associations
Whitefriars’ 17th century identity as ‘Alsatia’, a debtors’ sanctuary sunk in criminality
and squalor, was celebrated in contemporary works such as Thomas Shadwell’s
Squire of Alsatia (1688) and in a later range of folk songs and ballads.
Simultaneously, the area was closely associated with Elizabethan and Stuart theatre,
with three theatres operating for over a century.
Perhaps the area’s strongest association is with newspapers, specifically their
production. There were many combined printing presses and warehouses built in the
area towards the end of the 19th century. The Harmsworth brothers, founders of
Associated Newspapers, had a particularly strong link to the area with several offices
in various locations (e.g. 24 Tudor Street, Northcliffe House, Carmelite House).
Another significant activity in the area was glassworking, notably at the Whitefriars
Glassworks, established by the early 18th century on the corner of the present Tudor
Street and Whitefriars Street. The works was bought by James Powell in 1834 as an
occupation for his three sons; under the Powells, the company rose in stature to
become an important English glassmaker. It was noted for the quality of its products
and the breadth of its work, which ranged from the manufacture of tableware to
the production of highly specialised lenses, thermometers and other equipment
serving other professions in London. The company transferred its operations to
Wealdstone in 1923.
The legal profession may be sensed in Whitefriars, an association derived from its
proximity to the Inner and Middle Temples.
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
39
Management strategy
The management strategy sets out the position regarding the wider policies and
guidance concerning the conservation and enhancement of Whitefriars
Conservation Area. Future development schemes and enhancement projects will
need to take account of these policies in relation to the special architectural and
historic interest of the conservation area, as detailed in the above character
summary.
Documents produced by the Corporation are available on the website
www.cityoflondon.gov.uk .
14. Planning policy
National policy
The Civic Amenities Act 1967 gave local authorities the power to designate
conservation areas, and these powers are now contained in the Planning (Listed
Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990. The Act (section 69 (1) (a)) defines a
conservation area as ‘…an area of special architectural or historic interest, the
character and appearance of which it is desirable to preserve or enhance. Section
71 (1) of the Act requires the local planning authority to "formulate and publish
proposals for the preservation and enhancement of any parts of their area which
are Conservation Areas." See www.legislation.gov.uk.
The Government’s planning policies are contained within the National Planning
Policy Framework (NPPF), which came into force on 27 March 2012. Historic
environment policies are detailed in chapter 12 which sets out the requirements for
local authorities and applicants in relation to the conservation of heritage assets,
including conservation areas. See www.communities.gov.uk. The Department for
Communities and Local Government have published web-based Planning Practice
Guidance for the NPPF, of which the section ‘Conserving and enhancing the historic
environment’ is particularly relevant. See
http://planningguidance.planningportal.gov.uk/.
NPPF historic environment policies are supported by Historic Environment Good
Practice Advice notes 1-3, produced by Historic England. See
https://www.historicengland.org.uk/.
London-wide policy
The London Plan (2015) forms part of the statutory development plan for the City of
London and needs to be taken into account when considering development within
the Conservation Area. Key policies to consider are: policies 7.8 Heritage assets and
archaeology and 7.9 Heritage-led regeneration. See
www.london.gov.uk/thelondonplan.
City of London Corporation policy
Planning policy for the City of London is contained within the Local Plan, which was
adopted in January 2015. The Local Plan includes policies for Development
Management, which will be taken into account when deciding applications for
planning permission. See www.cityoflondon.gov.uk. Development proposals within
the Whitefriars Conservation Area have to be considered in the context of the
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
40
policies of the Local Plan. Within this framework, particular account will need to be
taken of Core Strategic Policies CS10 ‘Design’; CS12 ‘Historic Environment’; CS13
‘Protected Views’; CS 18 Flood Risk; CS19 ‘Open Spaces and Recreation’; CS20
‘Retailing’; and CS21 ‘Housing’.
Other key policies in the Local Plan are: DM12.1 ‘Managing change affecting all
heritage assets and spaces’; DM12.2 ‘Development in conservation areas’, DM12.3
‘Listed Buildings’, DM12.4 ‘Ancient monuments and archaeology’ and DM10.5
‘Shopfronts’.
Protected views
The London Plan and the City’s Local Plan seek to protect strategic views which are
defined within the London Plan’s SPG the London View Management Framework
(LVMF). In Whitefriars Conservation Area, the following Protected Vistas need to be
considered:
8A.1 - Westminster Pier to St Paul’s Cathedral (covering the Northern end of
Blackfriars Bridge and its approach). The viewing corridor development
threshold plane rises from 37.1m AOD to 42.7m AOD from SW to NE across the
south east section of the Conservation Area.
9A.1 - King Henry VIII’s Mound, Richmond, to St Paul’s Cathedral (The viewing
corridor covers Blackfriars Bridge approach, Unilever House and the former
City of London School; the viewing corridor and wider setting consultation
area includes Blackfriars Bridge, the Embankment frontages and the southern
half of New Bridge Street). The viewing corridor and consultation threshold
plane rises from 51.6m AOD to 51.8m AOD from SW to NE across the
Conservation Area.
Views from Blackfriars Bridge offers important prospects of London in either
direction. The view west towards Westminster is identified as a ‘river prospect’
(14A) within the London View Management Framework. Additionally, the
bridge and Embankment frontages form part of river prospects 11A, 12A, 13A,
13B, 15B, 16B and 17B.
Development proposals in Wider Setting Consultation Areas must be designed or
sited so that they preserve or enhance the viewer’s ability to recognise and
appreciate the Strategically Important Landmark, in this case St. Paul’s Cathedral.
Further detail can be found in the LVMF SPG - see www.london.gov.uk.
This character summary identifies a number of distant and local views that
contribute to the character of the conservation area (see section 5. Spatial analysis:
views and vistas). Proposals will be assessed for their potential effect on these and
other views of significant individual buildings, townscapes or skylines.
Whitefriars is included within the St Paul’s Heights Policy Area (entire CA except for
26-28 Tudor Street, NW corner of 25 Tudor Street and N tip of Temple Chambers). The
Victoria Embankment, associated frontages and Blackfriars Bridge are included in
the Monument Views Policy area (Monument View Four). More information on these
policy areas can be found in the City’s Protected Views SPD.
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
41
Sustainability and climate change
The Corporation is committed to being at the forefront of action in response to
climate change and other sustainability challenges that face high density urban
environments. In particular, areas will need to be resilient to warmer wetter winters,
hotter drier summers and more frequent extreme weather events.
In adapting to meet these challenges, it is important that sustainable development is
sensitive to the historic environment.
Issues specifically relevant to Whitefriars Conservation Area include:
The mature trees on the Victoria Embankment and area of planting at Blackfriars
Bridge approach contribute to the biodiversity of the conservation area (see
management of Open Spaces and Trees)
The junction between the Embankment, New Bridge Street, Blackfriars Bridge and
Queen Victoria Street suffers from traffic related air pollution including high levels
of nitrogen dioxide and fine particulates (PM 10). The City of London Air Quality
Strategy 2015-2020 (2015) sets out the current position and the measures required
to ensure predicted improvements in the City’s air quality.
The Whitefriars Conservation Area falls within the City Flood Risk Area (Policy
CS18) and is at particular risk from surface water/sewer flooding. Flood resistance
and resilience measures will be important in safeguarding the historic assets in this
area.
In order to minimise the risks of flooding, new development schemes will be
expected to make use of appropriate rainwater attenuation measures such as
the Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) and green roofs.
The Local Plan policy CS15 provides guidance on sustainable development and
climate change and policy CS18 on flood risk and SuDS. The City has also produced
a Climate Change Adaption Strategy (revised and updated January 2010).
15. Environmental enhancement
The draft City Streets & Spaces SPD (2015) sets out the policies to manage the public
realm, and will update and replace the City Street Scene Manual. This is being
prepared to promote high quality design and set the highest standards for every
element that contributes to our experience of the City’s streets. There are ten
overarching aims that support all interventions in the City’s public realm:
An increasingly higher standard of design quality;
Understanding context and character;
Simpler and less cluttered streets and spaces;
Better coordination and more consistency;
Protecting heritage and ensuring continuity;
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
42
More sustainable streets and spaces;
Supporting and encouraging good health, well-being and healthy lifestyles;
Making an exception for exceptional streets and spaces;
Better connected and more accessible streets and spaces;
Releasing the potential of streets and spaces to support commerce, culture
and art.
These principles, along with detailed guidance, and history and evolution of streets
and spaces in the City are set out in detail in the SPD.
A rolling programme of area strategies covers all parts of the City. The strategies set
out the overarching direction for the enhancement of the public realm, seeking to
create a more pleasant and sustainable street environment that encourages
walking and cycling, and enhances the historic character and local distinctiveness.
At present there is no adopted strategy for the Temple & Whitefriars area. The
Riverside Walk Enhancement Strategy, adopted January 2015, identifies completed
enhancement works to the area beneath Blackfriars Bridge and Paul’s Walk. Some
works were undertaken to the area as part of the Thameslink project.
The Thames Strategy SPD was adopted in June 2015 and contains further guidance
on the City’s intentions for the Thames riverside including the Whitefriars conservation
area.
16. Transport
Much work has already been done on reducing motor vehicle traffic in the City,
including in and around Whitefriars:
The Mayor's congestion charging zone scheme has significantly reduced
motor vehicle traffic in Central London;
The Mayor's low emission zone scheme has further reduced numbers of the
most-polluting heavy vehicles across London;
In adopting its Local Plan the City Corporation has refined its highway
hierarchy to further reduce the adverse impacts of motor vehicle traffic,
including on the valued character of the City's conservation areas, and will
continue to reduce the impact of traffic management infrastructure.
Further details about transport proposals, including the City of London Cycle Plan,
and Rail Strategy are available on the website. See www.cityoflondon.gov.uk
In addition, the Mayor’s North-South cycle superhighway will pass along Blackfriars
Bridge and New Bridge Street. The East-West cycle superhighway will pass along
Victoria Embankment. See www.tfl.org.uk.
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
43
17. Management of open spaces and trees
The City of London Corporation’s Open Space Strategy SPD (2015) details the
existing open spaces of the City, what spaces are to be provided in future, and how
these could be delivered. The City of London Biodiversity Action Plan 2010-2015
(2010) outlines the importance of the City’s urban green spaces, which includes
small public gardens, squares and churchyards; and built structures, which include
trees and manmade structures such as green walls and roofs. In addition, the City
has published a Habitat Action Plan for Urban Green spaces, Churchyards and
Cemeteries, and for Built Structures.
The City of London Corporation's Tree Strategy sets out how trees will be protected
and maintained and how further tree planting will be encouraged. Part 1 of the
Tree Strategy contains policy and guidance on the planting, preservation and
management of trees in the City and was adopted as a SPD in May 2012. Part 2
provides additional detailed guidance and information on the implementation of
part 1. See www.cityoflondon.gov.uk.
Subject to some exemptions, all trees in conservation areas are protected under
section 211 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended). Anyone
proposing to carry out works to a tree in a conservation area must give six weeks
notice of their intention to do so before works begin. There are no Tree Preservation
Orders in Whitefriars Conservation Area at present.
A new public open space will be created within the river to the west of Blackfriars
Bridge as part of the Thames Tideway Tunnel project.
18. Archaeology
The City is the historic centre of London and has a rich history, with monuments and
archaeological remains surviving from all periods. Its historic landscape has shaped
and influenced the modern townscape. There has been almost continuous
occupation of the City from the initial Roman settlement and there is also evidence
of earlier occupation. Physical evidence of the development of the City is
contained in the visible and buried monuments and archaeological remains. The
history of settlement has led to the build-up and development of a very complex,
and in some areas, deep archaeological sequence. Later building development
and basement construction has eroded the archaeological evidence, and in some
areas remains have been lost with no record or an incomplete record on only part
of a site.
Due to the complex layering of remains above and below ground, the entire City is
considered to have archaeological potential unless it can be demonstrated that
archaeological remains have been lost, due to basement construction or other
ground works.
Where developments are proposed which involve new groundworks, a historic
environment assessment, including an assessment of the archaeological potential
and impact of the proposals, will be required as part of the planning application.
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
44
Where significant remains survive, consideration will be given to amendments to the
proposals to ensure that disturbance to archaeological remains is minimised or
reduced. The Corporation will indicate the potential of a site, its relative importance
and the likely impact to a developer at an early stage, so that appropriate
assessment and design development can be undertaken. Developers should refer to
Planning Advice Note 3: Archaeology in the City of London, and Conservation Areas
in the City of London: A General Introduction to their Character, for further
information. See www.cityoflondon.gov.uk.
There is high archaeological potential in the Whitefriars Conservation Area,
including:
Environmental evidence of former Thames foreshore, river wall and
confluence with the river Fleet
Evidence of subsequent medieval and Victorian land reclamation
Medieval remains of Whitefriars’ friary buildings and precincts
Medieval and post medieval remains of Bridewell Palace
19. Enforcement
Breaches of planning control are investigated in accordance with the City of
London Development Management Service Standards. This sets out the manner and
timescales in which breaches will be investigated, and is available on the City of
London Corporation’s website. See www.cityoflondon.gov.uk
20. Condition of the conservation area
The buildings, open spaces and public realm of Whitefriars Conservation Area are
generally in good condition and maintained to a high standard. The adaption,
upgrading, repair, conservation, or redevelopment of buildings is managed to have
a minimum effect on neighbouring buildings, the highway and the amenity of the
area.
Potential pressures in the Conservation Area have been identified as new
development and utilities replacement works, although these do not threaten its
character. The condition of the Conservation Area is judged to have improved in
recent years, and is expected to further improve in coming years.
Planning applications will be judged against the local, regional and national policies
and guidance identified above, and the loss of buildings and features that
contribute to the character of the area will be resisted accordingly.
There are currently no buildings or structures within the Conservation Area that are
categorised as being at risk, due to deterioration of fabric, lack of occupancy, or
both. Such buildings or structures may be considered appropriate for entry in the
Heritage at Risk Register maintained by Historic England.
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
45
Further Reading and references
Barson, Susie, and Saint, Andrew, A Farewell To Fleet Street (1988)
Bradley, Simon, and Pevsner, Nikolaus, The Buildings of England London 1: The City of
London (1997).
http://www.buildingconservation.com. Information resources for conservation,
restoration and repairs, including specialist services and products, skills training and
links to the industry’s key organisations.
Dyson, Tony, The Medieval London Waterfront: Annual Archaeology Lecture,
Museum of London (1989).
Several of the documents listed below were published by English Heritage, an
organisation that has now changed its name to Historic England. Otherwise the
reference is as below.
English Heritage provides a wide range of advice and guidance on heritage
matters: http://www.english-heritage.org.uk. Some of the guidance is listed below.
English Heritage, Conservation Principles, Policies and Guidance for the Sustainable
Management of the Historic Environment (2008).
English Heritage, Understanding Place: Conservation Area Designation, Appraisal
and Management (2011).
English Heritage, Seeing the History in the View (2011).
English Heritage, The Setting of heritage assets (2011).
English Heritage guidance for property owners - http://www.english-
heritage.org.uk/your property. This section offers advice on maintenance, energy
efficiency and permissions and consents needed to make changes.
English Heritage climate change guidance and resources -
http://www.climatechangeandyourhome.org.uk/live.
English Heritage, The National Heritage List for England - http://www.english-
heritage.org.uk/professional/protection/process/national-heritage-list-for-england.
Freeman, Jennifer (editor) Save the City: a Conservation Study of the City of London
(1979).
Heritage Gateway provides access to extensive information on England’s historic
sites and buildings, including images of listed buildings. It allows cross-searching
almost 60 resources. http://www.heritagegateway.org.uk/gateway.
Historic England Traditional Windows: their care, repair and upgrading (2014)
https://content.historicengland.org.uk/images-books/publications/traditional-
windows-care-repair-upgrading/heag039-traditional-windows.pdf/
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
46
Institute of Historic Building Conservation (IHBC) in association with the Society for the
Protection of Ancient Buildings: A Stitch in Time: Maintaining Your Property Makes
Good Sense and Saves Money. Advice on maintaining buildings. A pdf can be
downloaded free of charge. http://www.ihbc.org.uk/publications
London Archaeological Archive and Research Centre (LAARC), administered by the
Museum of London.
Museum of London, Post-war Archaeology in the City of London, 1946-68: A Guide to
Records of Excavations by Prof W F Grimes held by the Museum of London
(Archaeological Gazetteer).
Schofield, John, with Maloney, Cath (eds) Archaeology in the City of London: A
Guide to Records of Excavations by the Museum of London and its Predecessors,
Museum of London (1998).
Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings (SPAB). SPAB offers a wide range of
training courses on period buildings for the conservation professional and non-
professional - http://www.spab.org.uk/education-training. SPAB aims to help owners
of old buildings by providing training, technical advice and publications
http://www.spab.org.uk/homeowners. For free building conservation advice,
telephone the SPAB technical advice line on 0207 456 0916 (Monday to Friday, 9.30
am to 12.30 pm). Books, technical pamphlets and information sheets are available
to purchase online.
Stephens Curl, James, Encyclopaedia of Architectural Terms (1992).
Strype, John, A Survey of the Cities of London and Westminster (1720).
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
47
Appendix
Designated heritage assets
Information correct as of October 2015 [adoption date TBC.] Please consult the City
of London Corporation’s website for up to date information. See
www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/plans.
Listed Buildings
Street
Number/name
Grade
of listing
Carmelite Street
8/1-5 Tallis Street (Carmelite House)
II
9
II
John Carpenter Street
Former Guildhall School of Music
II
New Bridge
Street/Bridewell Place
13 New Bridge Street/12 Bridewell Place
II
New Bridge Street
14
II*
15
II
Blackfriars House, 19
II
K2 Telephone Kiosk
II
Temperance Drinking Fountain
II
Temple Avenue
Hamilton House, 1
II
Telephone House, 2-4
II
Tudor Street
24
II
Northcliffe House, 26
II
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
48
Victoria Embankment
Sion College
II
Former City of London School for Boys, 60
II
Unilever House, 100
II
Embankment wall and lamp standards (the
entirety of the structure within the City is
covered by this listing)
II
Blackfriars Bridge
Blackfriars Bridge
II
Statue of Queen Victoria at approach
II
Whitefriars CA draft Character Summary & Management Strategy SPD
49
Contacts
Department of the Built Environment
City of London
P.O. Box 270
Guildhall
London EC2P 2EJ
Tel: 020 7332 1710
Email: plans@cityoflondon.gov.uk
Website: www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/plans
London Metropolitan Archives
40 Northampton Road
Clerkenwell
London EC1R 0HB
Tel: 020 7332 3820
Email: ask.lma@cityoflondon.gov.uk
Website: www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/lma
Whitefriars Conservation Area SPD draft no. IV: August 2015 prepared by Tom Nancollas
50
The City of London Corporation is the local planning authority for the financial and
commercial heart of Britain, the City of London. It is committed to maintaining and
enhancing the status of the business city as one of the world’s three leading
financial centres, through the policies it pursues and the high standard of services it
provides. Its responsibilities extend far beyond the City boundaries and it provides a
host of additional facilities for the benefit of the nation. These range from the
Central Criminal Court, the Old Bailey, to the famous Barbican Arts Centre and open
spaces such as Epping Forest and Hampstead Heath.
Among local authorities the City of London Corporation is unique. Not only is it the
oldest in the country, combining its ancient traditions and ceremonial functions with
the role of a modern and efficient authority, but it operates on a non-party political
basis through its Lord Mayor, Aldermen and Members of the Court of Common
Council.
The City of London Corporation: a unique authority for a unique city.