EXERCISE
REFLEXES
DISCUSSION
In
this
study,
using
muscle
groups
of
quite
different
total
mass
and
strength,
we
have
confirmed
the
finding
of
Lind
&
McNicol
(1967)
that
the
pressor
and
heart
rate
responses
to
isometric
contractions
are
related
to
the
proportion
of
maximal
tension
achieved
rather
than
to
the
bulk
of
the
contracting
muscle
group.
The
muscular
reflex
component
of
the
stimulus
to
the
pressor
response,
however,
does
not
conform
to
this
relation:
our
experiments
in
animals
and
in
humans
indicate
that
the
muscular
reflex
drive
is
proportional
to
the
bulk
of
contracting
muscle.
The
animal
experiments
reported
here
simply
illustrated
the
inter-
actions
of
pressor
reflexes
elicited
during
muscular
contractions.
While
there
was
considerable
variability
in
the
extent
of
interaction,
all
but
two
of
our
fifteen
experiments
showed
some
additive
drive
when
the
bulk
of
contracting
muscle
was
increased,
and
this
was
so
whether
the
added
muscle
was
contracting
maximally
or
submaximally.
The
human
experi-
ments
were
a
less
direct
approach
to
the
question,
examining
the
reflex
drives
only
after
the
isometric
efforts
were
completed.
When
circulatory
occlusion
is
applied
at
the
end
of
a
period
of
contraction
induced
by
ventral
root
stimulation
in
animals,
the
pressor
response
which
is
maintained
is
not
the
full
response
which
was
achieved
during
the
contraction
(McCloskey
&
Mitchell,
1972).
This
may
mean
that
intramuscular
mechanoreceptors
contribute
part
of
the
reflex
drive
during
induced
contractions.
Such
mechanoreceptors
would
not
be
the
muscle
spindles
or
tendon
organs,
however,
as
these
have
been
shown
not
to
contribute
to
the
cardio-
respiratory
drives
in
exercise
(McCloskey
&
Mitchell,
1972;
McCloskey,
Matthews
&
Mitchell,
1972).
It
must
be
conceded
that
the
reflex
stimuli
we
investigated
in
man
were
probably
only
part
of
the
total
reflex
drive
present
during
contractions
and
that
the
value
of
the
human
experiments
is
the
confirmation
they
provide
of
the
observations
made
in
the
animal
experiments
of
this
study.
The
arguments
above
refer
only
to
the
pressor
responses
to
isometric
contractions.
In
none
of
our
experiments,
whether
in
animals
or
in
humans,
were
we
able
to
relate
the
reflex
increases
in
heart
rate
to
the
bulk
of
the
muscle
group
exercising.
This
might
lead
to
the
simple
conclusion
that
primary
muscular
reflex
effects
upon
heart
rate
are
not
related
to
the
mass
of
contracting
muscle.
While
this
conclusion
may
be
quite
correct,
it
should
be
recognized
that
other
factors
also
operate
upon
heart
rate.
In
particular,
the
baroreceptor-cardiodepressor
reflex
may
be
of
importance
here.
In
studies
in
man,
Cunningham,
Petersen,
Peto,
Pickering
&
Sleight
(1972)
showed
that
the
baroreflex
is
reset
and
its
sensitivity
reduced
during
isometric
handgrips,
but
that
the
sensitivity
is
substantially
439