So how did our shift in re-thinking our dissemination efforts translate? Well, we went
from our traditional form of reporting (see image on left side of slide) to now re-
inventing our work in a manner that was reader-friendly and much more engaging (see
images on right side). For example, we prepared a “field note” which was a short fact
sheet that described the CHW program that we were evaluating. This gave us an
opportunity to not only focus on the evaluation findings, but to also highlight the
program that we were evaluating. And we can’t say that we got away from lengthy
documents entirely, because we also created an implementation guide. However, when
we designed this guide, we wanted it to serve as a tool that public health practitioners
could use and adapt to their setting.
I also want to take a moment to note that these products were not created in the
absence of a full-length comprehensive report, but rather inspired by such a report. It
was especially beneficial to be able to link these products back to the lengthier report,
which contains the detail that in many cases people appreciate or even expect from a
rigorous evaluation.
15