Microsoft PowerPoint - Sample Dissemination Plan

Abstract

The goal of the project is …… The project is developing

computer-based instructional modules for statics and

mechanics of materials. The project uses 3D rendering

and animation software, in which the user manipulates

virtual 3D objects in much the same manner as they would

physical objects. Tools being developed enable instructors

to realistically include external forces and internal

reactions on 3D objects as topics are being explained

during lectures. Exercises are being developed for

students to be able to communicate with peers and

instructors through real-time voice and text interactions.

The material is being beta tested at multiple institutions

including community colleges. The project is being

evaluated by … The project is being disseminated through

…

Sample Dissemination Plan

This project will serve as a pilot for other courses

at the University of ____ and at other colleges and

universities throughout the country. The results

of our evaluation will be disseminated on the

University's web site, which will contain a special

page devoted to this NSF-sponsored project.

Additional dissemination will occur through

presentations at conferences, such as teacher

education and science education conferences,

regionally and nationally, and through articles

published in peer-reviewed journals.

Sample Evaluation Plan

Assessment of the Student Response Technology (SRT)

will be both quantitative and qualitative. First, students

will be surveyed at the end of the semester on the

content, level of difficulty, and their perceived level of

mastery of the concepts of Statics. Second, faculty

members teaching the course using SRT will be asked to

judge its effectiveness in monitoring student

achievement throughout the semester. In addition,

faculty members who have been teaching Statics courses

for several years will be asked to compare students'

abilities after using SRT with those in previous years who

have not used SRT. Finally, the final grades of students

using SRT will be compared with those from previous

years who have not used the technology in the

classroom.

Excerpts from the Project Description

“The project will involve the collaboration of six institutions, two of which are

community colleges. The PIs will work with an advisory board made up of materials

engineers from different industry sectors. The industry board will contribute ideas for

examples, demonstrations, design problems, and laboratory projects. A community

college partnership with the lead university and community colleges in the area will be

used to solicit input on the modules from the community colleges.”

“The modular format of the curriculum will allow the material to be easily adapted to

other institutions and even other courses. Curriculum will be developed at one institution

and beta tested at another institution. The testing allows verification of the utility and

adaptability of the curriculum to multiple universities. The institutions involved in the

development and beta testing represent a diverse set of engineering schools, including

primarily teaching universities, research universities, and community colleges. They also

represent diverse student populations and different campus cultures. For example, the

lead university has very large minority and transfer student populations. One of the

collaborating institutions has a large population of non-traditional freshman (average age

5-6 years older than the traditional freshmen).”

“Each of the two sets of modules will involve demonstrations that show how materials

science and engineering relates to modern technologies. These demonstrations would be

ideal for use in recruiting at the high school level. The goal of all of these outreach

activities is to excite students about engineering and increase the number and diversity of

students entering the field. The modules developed for the Introduction to Materials class

have the potential to address this problem. For each module, the PIs will develop a small

packet that includes handouts on the relevant materials science and engineering concepts

and instructions for a classroom demonstration. These will be distributed to local high

schools with a letter encouraging teachers to distribute them to interested students.”

“Surveys of freshmen and sophomores who left engineering found that the most

important reason cited for women and second most important for men was that the reason

for choosing the major was found inappropriate. In other words, a significant number of

students were not retained because they no longer felt engineering offered interesting

work or many job opportunities. Thus, retention of engineering students may be

improved by placing the freshman and sophomore curriculum more in the context of true

engineering where they can see these opportunities. Efforts across the nation to enhance

the experience in freshmen engineering courses by adding design and/or project-based

components are a reflection of this effort.”

“Relevant conferences and journals where this work will be presented include American

Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in

Education Annual Conference, Materials Research Society Education Symposium,

Journal of Engineering Education, and the Journal of Materials Education. The full

content of the modules will be placed on CD-ROM. A major engineering publisher will

publish the modules.”

A. REVIEW CRITERIA

All NSF proposals are evaluated through use of two National Science Board approved merit review

criteria. In some instances, however, NSF will employ additional criteria as required to highlight the

specific objectives of certain programs and activities. For example, proposals for large facility

projects also might be subject to special review criteria outlined in the program solicitation.

The two merit review criteria are listed below. The criteria include considerations that help define

them. These considerations are suggestions, and not all will apply to any given proposal. While

proposers must address both merit review criteria, reviewers will be asked to address only those

considerations that are relevant to the proposal being considered and for which the reviewer is

qualified to make judgments.

What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity?

How important is the proposed activity to advancing knowledge and understanding within its own

field or across different fields? How well qualified is the proposer (individual or team) to conduct the

project? (If appropriate, the reviewer will comment on the quality of prior work.) To what extent

does the proposed activity suggest and explore creative and original concepts? How well

conceived and organized is the proposed activity? Is there sufficient access to resources?

What are the broader impacts of the proposed activity?

How well does the activity advance discovery and understanding while promoting teaching,

training, and learning? How well does the proposed activity broaden the participation of

underrepresented groups (e.g., gender, ethnicity, disability, geographic, etc.)? To what extent will it

enhance the infrastructure for research and education, such as facilities, instrumentation, networks,

and partnerships? Will the results be disseminated broadly to enhance scientific and technological

understanding? What may be the benefits of the proposed activity to society?

NSF staff will give careful consideration to the following in making funding decisions:

Integration of Research and Education

One of the principal strategies in support of NSF's goals is to foster integration of research and

education through the programs, projects and activities it supports at academic and research

institutions. These institutions provide abundant opportunities where individuals may concurrently

assume responsibilities as researchers, educators, and students, and where all can engage in joint

efforts that infuse education with the excitement of discovery and enrich research through the

diversity of learning perspectives.

Integrating Diversity into NSF Programs, Projects, and Activities

Broadening opportunities and enabling the participation of all citizens, women and men,

underrepresented minorities, and persons with disabilities, are essential to the health and vitality of

science and engineering. NSF is committed to this principle of diversity and deems it central to the

programs, projects, and activities it considers and supports.

From Grant Proposal Guide NSF 04-23