Rev Bras Med Esporte – 2023; Vol. 29 – e2023_0061
of 4
Page
3
to the table tennis talent training plan of the physical education teachers.
This is a closed school, so the work and rest and diet problems among
the members are basically eliminated, so that the experimental results
are more rigorous.
Before and after the experiment, collect relevant data for testing, sort
out and analyze the data, as shown in the following section.
RESULTS
Effect of lower limb flexibility exercise on table tennis players
Table 2 selects three indicators of 1RM squat, CMJ jump and 1min
squat as the change judgment of table tennis players’ lower limb strength
to explore the impact of lower limb flexibility training on table tennis
players’ lower limb strength. In the experimental group, 1RM squat
strength increased to (79.653 ± 9.5901) kg, P<0.05; The jumping height
of CMJ in the experimental group increased to (34.923 ± 4.7450) cm,
P<0.05; The number of squats in the experimental group increased to
(52.880 ± 5.4616) times in 1 min, P<0.01. In the control group, 1RM squat
strength decreased to (77.985 ± 9.3268) kg, P>0.05; The jumping height
of CMJ in the experimental group increased to (33.961 ± 4.2288) cm,
P>0.05; The number of squats in the experimental group decreased to
(52.411 ± 5.8042) times (P>0.05). (Table 3)
Table 2 selects six indicators, including sitting forward flexion, hip
flexion, hip extension, sitting forward flexion, hip flexion and hip extension,
as the change judgment of table tennis players’ lower limb flexibility to
explore the impact of lower limb flexibility training on table tennis play-
ers’ lower limb flexibility. In the experimental group, the forward bending
distance in the sitting position was increased to (28.450 ± 8.7495) cm,
P<0.05; The hip flexion angle expanded to (113.924 ± 10.7408) °, P<0.05;
The hip extension angle expanded to (12.114 ± 4.1516) °, P<0.05; The knee
flexion angle expanded to (130.031 ± 7.9293) °, P<0.05; The flexion angle
of ankle and toe was enlarged to (41.782 ± 7.1076) °, P<0.05; The ankle
dorsiflexion angle expanded to (20.333 ± 3.2951) °, P<0.01. In the control
group, the forward bending distance in the sitting position was increased
to (25.651 ± 6.6634) cm, P>0.05; The hip flexion angle decreased to (110.134
± 9.4602) °, P>0.05; The hip extension angle expanded to (9.947 ± 3.9098)
°, P>0.05; The knee flexion angle decreased to (128.175 ± 8.3445) °, P>0.05;
The flexion angle of ankle and toe decreased to (40.979 ± 7.4649) °, P>0.05;
The ankle dorsiflexion angle expanded to (16.858 ± 3.4463) °, P>0.05.
Effect of lower limb flexibility exercise on the sensitivity of
table tennis players
Table 4 selects three indicators, namely, 30m run, cross jump and
splay step, as the change judgment of table tennis players’ sensitivity to
explore the impact of lower limb flexibility training on table tennis players’
sensitivity. Cross-quadrant jump is a common evaluation standard used
to test the sensitivity quality of athletes. Under the guidance of visual
signals, athletes operate their bodies to jump into the corresponding
quadrants. This process can also simulate the sensitivity and reaction
on the field. Athletes should first have strong reaction ability, be able to
quickly identify the information seen by their eyes and transmit it to the
sports center. The sports center should operate the body to complete
the correct jump in a short time, which also requires high sensitivity.
Pushing, blocking, side and right are the common training footwork
requirements of athletes in table tennis training. First, the players attack
the ball with backhand, then catch the ball with forehand position,
and then use cross steps to move to the right to complete the action
of receiving the ball. This series of actions requires high inertia and
speed, which requires the athletes to be familiar with the action, have
high reaction ability, and also have strong sensitivity, Therefore, it can
be used as a main evaluation standard. The fixed-point swing speed of
the whole station is a further test of athletes’ ability. In this test, there is
no well-designed action routine. The coach serves the ball at random,
and the players receive the ball on the other side according to their
own experience and reaction. This is completely a simulation of the
game scene, showing the actual combat ability of the players. Table 5
selects three indicators, namely, 3m sideslip, push and block sideslip,
and swing speed of the whole platform at fixed points, as the change
judgment of table tennis players’ competitive performance, and discus-
ses the impact of lower limb flexibility training on table tennis players’
competitive performance.
Table 2. Effect of lower limb flexibility training on lower limb strength of table tennis
players.
Experience group
Option 1RM squat (kg) CMJ jump (cm) 1 min squat (times)
Before experiment 79.255±8.4325 34.553±5.1532 51.919±6.4290
After experiment 79.653±9.5901 34.923±4.7450 52.880±5.4616
P 0.02667 0.01633 0.00493
Control group
Option 1RM squat (kg) CMJ jump (cm) 1 min squat (times)
Before experiment 78.127±9.4853 33.435±4.6638 52.470±5.8848
After experiment 77.985±9.3268 33.961±4.2288 52.411±5.8042
P 0.97561 0.59444 0.74252
Table 3. Effect of lower limb flexibility training on lower limb flexibility of table
tennis players.
Experience group
Option
Forward flexion in
sitting position (cm)
Hip flexion (°) Hip extension (°)
Before experiment 25.786±9.1444 109.575±12.3437 10.147±3.4463
After experiment 28.450±8.7495 113.924±10.7408 12.114±4.1516
P 0.03810 0.04760 0.01886
Option Knee flexion (°) Ankle toe flexion (°)
Ankle
dorsiflexion (°)
Before experiment 129.299±7.6103 41.002±6.8110 16.574±4.9578
After experiment 130.031±7.9293 41.782±7.1076 20.333±3.2951
P 0.03670 0.04076 0.00695
Control group
Option
Forward flexion in
sitting position (cm)
Hip flexion (°) Hip extension (°)
Before experiment 25.277±8.6932 111.197±11.0154 9.866±3.5773
After experiment 25.651±6.6634 110.134±9.4602 9.947±3.9098
P 0.97059 0.68255 0.20350
Option Knee flexion (°) Ankle toe flexion (°)
Ankle
dorsiflexion (°)
Before experiment 128.360±8.4927 41.093±7.5001 16.314±4.7462
After experiment 128.175±8.3445 40.979±7.4649 16.858±3.4463
P 0.58857 0.72103 0.56781
Table 4. The Effect of Lower Limb Flexibility Exercise on the Sensitivity of Table
Tennis Players.
Experience group
Option 30m run (s)
Cross jump
(correct number)
Eight character
stamp (s)
Before experiment 5.403±0.2306 24.547±2.8962 21.257±2.6200
After experiment 5.231±0.1114 27.343±3.0773 19.824±1.6828
P 0.01362 0.00645 0.03330
Control group
Option 30m run (s)
Cross jump
(correct number)
Eight character
stamp (s)
Before experiment 5.413±0.1404 23.953±2.5966 21.628±2.1464
After experiment 5.251±0.2025 25.408±2.0846 20.882±2.2975
P 0.02827 0.03256 0.06190