ensemble projected further winter warming on the order of +1.1 to +3.1EC under different
emissions scenarios by 2064, and more by century’s end. Warming trends would shift the
distribution of daily temperatures upwards, thereby “decreasing the number of days that fall
below cold-temperature thresholds” (Hayoe et al. 2006). Such projections, together with our
demand-side findings about weather effects, suggest steeper challenges ahead for this industry.
DISCUSSION
Nearly three decades ago, as global warming began its not-yet-recognized takeoff, Dunlap and
Catton (1979:243) described the emergence of environmental sociology, which asserted that
“physical environments can influence (and in turn be influenced by) human societies and
behavior.” The development signaled, in principle, a rejection of the idea that researchers can
explain social facts only in terms of other social facts. Perhaps most of us now agree, but in
practice the goal of integrating environmental indicators as variables in social research has not
been simple. Much environmental sociology remains focused within the social domain, making
progress in research on environment-related policies, movements, attitudes or behavior.
Environmental conditions themselves then appear indirectly, as background concerns or objects
of social construction, instead of direct measures that covary as cause or effect with human
activities. More formal integration has been limited by the fact that environmental and social
data tend to be observed across different units, at different scales, and have different dynamics.
The two obvious dimensions for integrating environmental variables are time and space. Spatial
integration occurred classically in cross-sectional research where, for example, nations, states,
counties or cities comprise the units of analysis. Environmental variables available for such units
include measures of resource consumption (e.g., oil, electricity, or proxies based on wealth),
effluent emissions (e.g., CO
2
, solid wastes, hazardous wastes), environmental quality (e.g., air,
water or soil contamination), or mean climate (for examples see Adeola 2001; Brooks and Sethi
1997; Carson, Jeon and McCubbin 1997; Dietz and Rosa 1997; Ehrhardt-Martinez 1998; Hope
et al. 2006; Jorgenson 2004; Rasker 2006; Rudel 1999; York, Rosa and Dietz 2003).
Environmental circumstances such as climate-change vulnerability can be considered among the
background factors affecting individual survey respondents whose locations are known (e.g.,
Zahran et al. 2006). Recent advances in modeling and remote sensing have made technically-
defined spatial units such as grid cells or satellite-image pixels available for integrated research
(e.g., Grove et al. 2006). Spatially-integrated data of most types can be mapped or, where
enough observations exist, analyzed through multiple regression and related methods.
Alternatively, we might employ time as the integrating dimension, using years, months or days
for our units of analysis. Yearly time series of aggregated social data are widely available, as are
yearly series of business and economic statistics, resource-use measures such as fishery landings,
farm harvests, mine output or timber cutting, some ecological monitoring, and weather/climate
summaries at many scales. Yearly time series permit simple integration and, importantly, focus
our attention on change. Such data tend to be limited, however, in the length of available
17