Migration Policy Regimes 35
This indicator examines whether the country’s laws
establish the right for nonnationals to access ed-
ucation. The indicator contains two components:
“migrants with residency permits” and “migrants
without residency permits.”
As with access to the right to healthcare, the main
finding is that most states that have adopted new
immigration laws in the last 20 years explicitly
include the right for migrants without residency
permits (those whose status is irregular) to ac-
cess education and equal treatment for nationals
and nonnationals. Countries can be grouped as
follows:
The first contains countries that have passed im-
migration-related legislation since 2000 that ex-
plicitly include the right to access education (see
table 2), even for those without a residency permit.
This is the case in Argentina (2004), Chile (2021),
Mexico (2011), Peru (2017), Uruguay (2008), and
Venezuela (2004). In Brazil, Bolivia, and Ecuador,
the right is not recognized in recent migration leg-
islation but is contained in other administrative or-
ders adopted in recent years.
The second group is made up of countries whose
legislation does not specify whether there is equal
treatment in access to education or whether this
includes those who are undocumented. This group
includes Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Hon-
duras, Paraguay, and the Dominican Republic.
The third group is made up of Caribbean countries
whose immigration laws were passed decades
ago and do not include the right to education. The
countries in this group are Bahamas, Barbados,
Suriname, and Trinidad and Tobago.
The final group is made up of countries that do
not explicitly grant the right of access to educa-
tion to foreigners or those in an irregular situation.
Colombia grants this right to Venezuelan citizens
regardless of their migration status, but not to oth-
er irregular migrants. In Panama and Nicaragua, a
residency permit is required to enroll in the edu-
cation system. In Belize, the law grants nationals
and permanent residents the right to access edu-
cation, but not others. Finally, the constitutions of
Guyana, Jamaica, and Haiti only enshrine the right
to education for nationals. In other cases, the da-
tabase indicates when irregular migrants do not
have access to education due to there being no
5.c Right to education
specific clause in the legislation granting them this
right. It is possible, however, that individuals may
have access to the right to education based on
a combined reading of the Constitution, national
legislation, and the international treaties to which
the state is a party (particularly the Convention on
the Rights of the Child). This is the case in the Ba-
hamas and Costa Rica, among others.
This indicator examines whether the country’s laws
explicitly establish the right to the reunification of
both the nuclear family (spouse and underage chil-
dren) and the extended family. The indicator thus
covers both of these aspects. The main finding is
that most states allow reunification with both the
nuclear family and other family members.
First, the right to family reunification (which is
sometimes known as family unity or the preserva-
tion of family unity) has been made a right in many
recent immigration acts, including those of Argen-
tina (2004), Uruguay (2008), Bolivia (2013), Brazil
(2017), Chile (2021), Ecuador (2017 law following
the reform of article 1 in 2021), Mexico (2011), or
Peru (2017).
Second, it is worth mentioning that 21 of the 26
IDB borrowing member states use broad defini-
tions of “family” that extend beyond the nuclear
family. The only exceptions are the Bahamas and
Suriname, which only allow for reunification with
the nuclear family, and Haiti, Jamaica, and Vene-
zuela, which have not legislated the issue. The Do-
minican Republic is at a halfway point: it recog-
nizes the reunification of disabled adult children
but only with Dominican nationals or permanent
residents, not with temporary residents. The most
relatives with whom reunification beyond the nu-
clear family is most often recognized include civil
unions (e.g., Guatemala, Peru, and Mexico), older
children with disabilities (e.g., Argentina, Bolivia,
Colombia, and Uruguay), parents (e.g., Chile, Nic-
aragua, and Paraguay), grandchildren and grand-
parents (e.g., Ecuador, Honduras, and Trinidad and
Tobago), siblings (e.g., Costa Rica), or others up
to the second degree of anity (e.g., El Salvador).
Third, in some cases, applicants are required to
have a permanent residency permit (e.g., Bahamas,
Colombia, Ecuador, Honduras, and Paraguay), and
in some countries, there is preferential treatment
for citizens from the region (e.g., Belize, Guyana,
and Jamaica).
5.d Right to family reunification