VARATHAN; A SYMBOLIC EXUBERANCE OF MALE GAZE vOlUme - 8 | issUe - 3 | decembeR - 2018
________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________________
Journal for all Subjects : www.lbp.world
2
male gaze. In this world which has always been dominated by man, there has been a long history of
oppression against women. The history of Indian cinema presents a woeful picture of discrimination and
marginalization of women. Whether it is a film of the 50s or of the 90s there has been little difference in
the image of the celluloid woman. Commercial films are not going to change overnight in their attitude
towards them, an attitude marked by discrimination and exploitation. This image has been so
constantly drilled into the Indian female psyche that women themselves have started believing in this
'self-portrait and no one can disagree with the strong subconscious influence and hypnotic effect that
films have on our minds. The makers of these films (mostly men) emphasize that they are simply
catering to what the audiences are accustomed to seeing. There is a strong resistance to the image of
the woman who is articulate, vocal and independent. The celluloid lady has always been flown as a
secondary, subservient figure. It is a different form of enslavement.
Varathan (Outsider) is a 2018 released Indian Malayalam language movie directed by Amal
Neerad which is an unofficial remake of Straw Dogs (1971) by Sam Peckinpah. The movie tells the story
of Aby and his wife Priya who were lands in Priya’s village “Pathinettam Vayal” and moved to her
ancestral farm house in the hills. Priya who is leading a modern life became targeted by the particularly
unrefined male dominated culture of the village. From the first day of her life in the village she feels
some sort of insecurity amidst the presence of her presumably meek and socialite husband. Of course
she was afraid of the people who leased the land for cultivation. Recurrently the villagers and the
people around them are shown ogling them with distaste. This is most important part in which the
director infused the concept of male gaze as a tool to indicate the constrained social setup of the
village. The whole village is shown as a “masculine infested” place of insecurity and lost hope.
Occasionally the movie fills with dialogues which treat the outsiders as troublemakers of the village. As
in one such instance Benny, the family’s local hand and a politician opined that the outsiders come to
their village for their enjoyment and the villagers have to get along with the after effects of those
troubles made by the ‘varathans’. This is the overall idea of the villagers on the outsiders where they
forget that their ancestors were also outsiders. The idea of insider outsider conflict even reach up to the
level of moral policing which is a frequent social activity today. The people who engage in moral policing
themselves violate the moral codes. They even scan each and every one who pass through their life and
vicinity and try to invade into their private spaces. That is the point where Aby’s family security became
threatened by the people outside their private space. The insiders of the village became outsiders for
the family.
In the movie sexual objectification created with male gaze have far reaching effects. As it is one
of the major part in the patriarchal order in which women are not equal to men. The spectator in this
culture is a man based on the patriarchal order, and this is what makes the spectacle a woman. She is
presented as an embodiment of eroticism which marks her as an object to fulfill the immature fantasies
of the spectator who is a male. The film aestheticises the message portrayed by making the women as
the victim of gaze. The gaze that is presented in the movie viewed the character of Priya as a vehicle of
fetishistic fantasies, disregarding her identity and personality. In one such scene a character named
Jithin who was erstwhile classmate of Priya, who is somewhat an anti social element, stole her
undergarments from the washing place and held it tight with encircling emotions with violent
inhalation.
In the essay Objectification theory: Toward Understanding Women’s lived Experiences and
Mental Health Risks, Barbara Fredrickson and Tomi-Ann Roberts asserts that as a result of the sexual
objectification women have a self image they are constantly being monitored by others which causes
stress and mental disorders, which is applicable to the predicament of Priya. Along with the traumatic
mental state caused by an abortion and the fear of being watched by the outsiders had affected her
psyche. Two scenes in the movie underline the same. One in which the character of Priya in bed being