staffed.
Among the reasons cited in the IG report for understaffing are the same reasons cited by
PASS over the years. These include increasing workload, hiring challenges, extended hiring and
training periods, and increasing oversight responsibility (including for the evolving unmanned
aerial system segment).
The agency itself has recognized the need to maintain a robust inspector workforce. According to
the FAA, “To meet the safety needs of the NAS, AVS will need to recruit, hire, maintain, and
retain a workforce with outstanding technical expertise, capabilities, and adaptability. Our efforts
must ensure we can hire and retain the right people with the right skills and mindset, engaged at
the right time, with systematic coordination between certification and operational suitability.”
PASS agrees with the FAA and we are eager to assist in the endeavor.
PASS also agrees with the FAA administrator’s June 13, 2024, testimony before the Senate
Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation where he encouraged stakeholders to
provide mentoring to newer employees. “There has been a significant loss of experienced
workers and a lack of that natural transfer of knowledge,” Administrator Mike Whitaker
testified. “What we are encouraging operators in the system to do is recognize that as a risk and
build programs around that to mitigate that risk, which means more training, more mentoring and
more time to complete tasks.”
However, with inspector staffing at inadequate levels within the
agency, this is a challenge with the current workforce.
As stated earlier, PASS is currently in contract negotiations with AVS for a new collective
bargaining agreement. This should serve as a perfect vehicle to develop processes and incentives
aimed at promoting recruiting and retention. One of the issues focused on is telework, which has
become a major recruiting and retention tool. Aviation employees in the private sector, including
those representing airlines, general aviation and pilot certification, value the flexibilities of
telework offered by the industry. While the private sector is oftentimes the recruiting grounds for
new FAA employees, these incentives must remain available to remain competitive with the
private sector.
Aviation Safety Inspector Staffing Model
The “staffing model” currently being used by the agency is insufficient to determine the number
of aviation safety inspectors needed. As noted by the IG in 2021, due to the model not including
relevant inspector staffing data, it “will be limited in its ability to determine whether the model
provides reliable information on projected inspector staffing levels.” The same report noted that
managers are reluctant to use the model.
PASS is asking that the FAA be directed to revise its inspector staffing model in collaboration
with the union. In light of recent events, it is more important than ever that the agency knows
U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Inspector General, FAA Can Increase Its Inspector Staffing Model’s
Effectiveness by Implementing System Improvements and Maximizing Its Capabilities, August 11, 2021, p. 5.
Federal Aviation Administration, Aviation Safety Workforce Plan 2021-2030, p. i.
“FAA Oversight of Aviation Manufacturing,” Hearing before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and
Transportation, June 13, 2024.